13.07.2015 Views

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

jih <strong>in</strong>tenzivnejšega <strong>prostor</strong>skega razvojaodkriva tudi razkroj tradicionalnega kraj<strong>in</strong>skegavzorca.V postopku tipološke klasifikacije so biliopredeljeni številni kraj<strong>in</strong>ski tipi (njivske kraj<strong>in</strong>ena ravn<strong>in</strong>i, njivske kraj<strong>in</strong>e na gričevju, preplettrav<strong>in</strong>ja <strong>in</strong> gozda, kraj<strong>in</strong>e travnatega sveta,kraj<strong>in</strong>e v<strong>in</strong>ogradov <strong>in</strong> sadovnjakov ipd.), ki senačeloma pojavljajo v vseh kraj<strong>in</strong>skih regijah <strong>in</strong>jih označujejo različni kraj<strong>in</strong>ski vzorci.1. 3. Vrednotenje kraj<strong>in</strong>Vrednotenje kraj<strong>in</strong> je bilo opravljeno zvrednotenjem kraj<strong>in</strong>skih enot na najnižji ravni,na ravni kraj<strong>in</strong>skih podenot, <strong>za</strong>radi potrebe, dase <strong>za</strong> <strong>prostor</strong>ski plan Slovenije pripravijovrednostne oznake posameznih delov Slovenije,<strong>in</strong> posledično tudi <strong>za</strong> oblikovanje usmeritev <strong>za</strong>razvoj ali varovanje kraj<strong>in</strong>e. Predmet vrednotenjaje bila kraj<strong>in</strong>ska enota.Merila <strong>za</strong> vrednotenje kraj<strong>in</strong>Namen vrednotenja je bil opredeliti vitalnost(naravno <strong>in</strong> ekonomsko), doživljajsko prijetnost(lepoto) <strong>in</strong> stabilnost (zdravost) kraj<strong>in</strong>e naocenjevalni lestvici, na kateri so bila opredeljenareferenčna stanja, od najbolj <strong>za</strong>želenih stanj dotistih, ki pomenijo razvrednotenje nekega<strong>prostor</strong>a <strong>in</strong> zmanjševanje njegovih potencialov.Izbrana so bila štiri osnovna merila: naravnaohranjenost, pestrost, <strong>prostor</strong>ski red <strong>in</strong>harmoničnost.a) Naravna ohranjenost: upoštevane so bileohranjene naravne prv<strong>in</strong>e oziroma prv<strong>in</strong>skostobmočij, hkrati pa tudi območja, ki jih imamo <strong>za</strong>naravna (prepuščena naravi), čeprav so lahkonastala sekundarno.b) Pestrost: upoštevali smo pestrost pojavov,pestrost oblik <strong>in</strong> pestrost prv<strong>in</strong>. Pri doživljanjupestrosti gozda sta npr. visoka vegetacija(vertikalna struktura) <strong>in</strong> masa (volumen) zelopomembni. Gozd se lahko pojavlja v različnih,zelo pestrih oblikah (večji ali manjši gozdiči,gozdni jeziki v grapah, ravn<strong>in</strong>ski gozdovi, boršti)Večja je pestrost tudi v pove<strong>za</strong>vi z reliefom, naprimer gozd z reliefom ali vode z reliefom.c) Prostorski red: upoštevani so bili le vzorcireda, pri čemer je bila kompleksnost kot najvišjastopnja reda, ki vsebuje že merilo skladnosti,– relief - together with waters it forms thebasic morphologic foundation for a landscapestructure;– land use or surface cover - a synthesis ofclimate and relief, and <strong>in</strong> the areas of themost <strong>in</strong>tensive spatial development it alsoreflects the dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of the traditionallandscape pattern.In the procedure of typological classification severallandscape types (field landscapes on pla<strong>in</strong>s,agricultural mosaic pattern <strong>in</strong>terchang<strong>in</strong>g withforest and contiguous villages, landscape of extensiveagriculture based on grassland, landscapesof v<strong>in</strong>eyards and orchards a. s.) were def<strong>in</strong>edthat appear, as a rule, <strong>in</strong> all landscape regionsand are characterized by different landscapepatterns.1. 3. Evaluation of landscapeThe evaluation of landscape was carried out <strong>in</strong>the process of evaluation of landscape units atthe lowest level. It was made because of theneed to prepare value def<strong>in</strong>itions of <strong>in</strong>dividualparts of Slovenia for the spatial plan, and consequentlyalso for the formation of the landscapedevelopment or protection guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The subjectof evaluation was a landscape unit.Criteria for evaluationThe purpose of evaluation was to rank the vitality(natural and economic), experienced pleasure(»amenity«), and stability (»health«/health<strong>in</strong>ess)of the landscape on the evaluation scale def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe reference landscape conditions from themost desired ones to those denot<strong>in</strong>g degradationand reduction of the area’s potentials. Fourbasic criteria were selected: natural conservation,diversity, spatial order and harmony.a) Natural preservation – naturalness: It denotespreserved natural elements or the elementar<strong>in</strong>essof areas, as well as the areas perceivedas natural (left to nature) although they may beof secondary orig<strong>in</strong>.b) Diversity: We took <strong>in</strong>to consideration the diversityof phenomena, the variation of shape andthe diversity of elements. Very important factorsof experienc<strong>in</strong>g diversity are forests because oftheir high growth (vertical structure) and volume.The forest appears <strong>in</strong> many different and variedforms (large or small patches of forest, tonguesof forest <strong>in</strong> rav<strong>in</strong>es, forest <strong>in</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>s). Diversity also57Delavnica 1 / Workshop 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!