13.07.2015 Views

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44Delavnica 1 / Workshop 1ter posameznikovim videnjem <strong>in</strong> vrednotenjemtega istega <strong>prostor</strong>a ali teh istih kraj<strong>in</strong>.V kraj<strong>in</strong>skem načrtovanju se vedno znovasrečujemo s potrebo po opredelitvi kraj<strong>in</strong>skeidentitete na vseh ravneh načrtovanja, odlokalne do regionalne ali celo državne. Vvsakdanjem ravnanju je ta največkrat zmotnopojmovana kot stanje, kot nespremenljiva fizičnapojavnost, medtem ko gre prav<strong>za</strong>prav <strong>za</strong> vednoznova nastajajoči odnos med neko fizičnopojavnostjo kraj<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> pogledom nanjo. Kraj<strong>in</strong>enastajajo z v<strong>za</strong>jemnim delovanjem med<strong>prostor</strong>om ter posamezniki <strong>in</strong> družbo, ki ga ssvojim delovanjem sprem<strong>in</strong>jajo. Prostor resdalahko opišemo s fizičnimi prv<strong>in</strong>ami, ki gasestavljajo, vendar v tem primeru razberemosamo kraj<strong>in</strong>sko podobo v trenutnem časovnempreseku, ne da bi razumeli, v kakšen kontekstuse pojavlja v družbeni predstavi.Zato se pojavlja vprašanje, kaj sploh je kraj<strong>in</strong>skaidentiteta. To vprašanje je aktualno na regionalni<strong>in</strong>, kot bomo videli, kljub težnji po odmiranjunacionalne države, tudi na nacionalni ravni. Tovprašanje bo najbrž znotraj Evropske skupnostivedno bolj <strong>za</strong>nimivo, saj se prvič posamezni deliEU ponovno sprašujejo o svoji identiteti <strong>in</strong>drugič, vzporedno nastaja tudi nova <strong>evropska</strong><strong>prostor</strong>ska identiteta. Lahko soobstajajo?Če predpostavimo, da gre ob izmerljivem <strong>in</strong>stvarnem, čemur bi lahko rekli identiteta kraj<strong>in</strong>e,pri iskanju kraj<strong>in</strong>ske identitete bolj <strong>za</strong> odnos dokraj<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>za</strong> identifikacijo s kraj<strong>in</strong>o, je njihovsoobstoj možen. Kot posamezniki <strong>in</strong> družba selahko identificiramo z več stvarmi, v tem primeruz več ravnmi kraj<strong>in</strong>e hkrati. Pri nacionalniidentifikaciji gre seveda <strong>za</strong> to, da se jenavezovala na tiste kraj<strong>in</strong>e, v katere je bilspontano (ali namenoma) <strong>in</strong>vestiran smisel, sajse prav <strong>za</strong>radi pripisovanja pomenov identitetane navezuje na <strong>prostor</strong> sam po sebi, temveč na<strong>in</strong>gs. The frame is shaped by culture, conventionand cognition 3 . Therefore it is important to presumethat differences can be found betweenphysical descriptions of landscapes (such as typologicalclassification for example) and <strong>in</strong>dividualor social perception and evaluation ofthese very same landscapes.In landscape plann<strong>in</strong>g we constantly encounterthe problem of how to def<strong>in</strong>e the identity of thelandscape. This happens on all levels of plann<strong>in</strong>g,from local to regional, even on the statelevel. What immediately comes to light <strong>in</strong> thiscontext is the problem of the erroneous perceptionof spatial identity as unchangeable; it isdealt with as a physical phenomenon, while <strong>in</strong>reality it <strong>in</strong>volves ever new relationships s<strong>in</strong>celandscape are created through the reciprocal<strong>in</strong>teraction between the spatial reality and theperception of this spatial reality.They are created by the <strong>in</strong>teraction between thespace and <strong>in</strong>dividuals and society who changethe space and <strong>in</strong>scribe their history on it throughtheir actions. A certa<strong>in</strong> space can be describedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to the physical components of whichit is composed, but <strong>in</strong> this case we grasp only itsimage <strong>in</strong> a particular moment <strong>in</strong> time, withoutany understand<strong>in</strong>g of values that are expressedthrough the social identification with that space.What landscape identity is <strong>in</strong> general and howit comes <strong>in</strong>to be<strong>in</strong>g? This is a current question onregional and, despite the wither<strong>in</strong>g away of theconcept of the national state, on national level aswell. This is why we can assume that this questionmight as well be quite <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> theEuropean Union, firstly, because <strong>in</strong>dividual partsof the European Union start re-engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> thequest for their regional (or national) identitywith<strong>in</strong> this new political context and, secondly,a new, European spatial identity gets formedalong the way. Can they coexist?1. a, b, cV Sloveniji prevladuje podoba idiličnega podeželja, polnega naravnih lepot, obdanih z vencem gora. Največkrat se s to podobo tudi predstavljamonavzven; je podoba, ki jo pr<strong>in</strong>ašamo na svetovni trg.In Slovenia the conception prevails of an idyllic countryside full of natural beauties and surrounded by a wreath of mounta<strong>in</strong>s. In most cases we alsopresent ourselves abroad with such a picture; it is a picture we br<strong>in</strong>g to the world market.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!