13.07.2015 Views

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Po starostnih skup<strong>in</strong>ah <strong>in</strong> izbiri tehnike so biliizdelki razvrščeni:LIKOVNI FOTO. MAKETEA 4-6 let 343 37 7B 7-10 let 258 15 5C 11-15 let 196 158 9Skupaj(1029) 797 210 22Izbor motiva:Motivi na izdelkih so bili predvsem– naravna ali kulturna kraj<strong>in</strong>a,– mesto ali mestna kraj<strong>in</strong>a,– vzorci v <strong>kraj<strong>in</strong>i</strong> - predstavljeni tudi abstraktno,– otroška igrišča, šolska igrišča, domači vrtovi,– posamezni elementi kraj<strong>in</strong>e (drevesa, cvetlice,hiše, kozolci, ml<strong>in</strong>i – kot elementi, kisestavljajo kraj<strong>in</strong>o, <strong>in</strong> tudi človek <strong>in</strong> živali kotsestavni del kraj<strong>in</strong>e).Strokovna komisija <strong>za</strong> izbor najboljših izdelkov jebila 10-članska, sestavljena iz predstavnikovUniverze v Ljubljani, Biotehniške fakultete,Oddelka <strong>za</strong> kraj<strong>in</strong>sko arhitekturo <strong>in</strong> kraj<strong>in</strong>skiharhitektov članov Društva kraj<strong>in</strong>skih arhitektovSlovenije.Merila <strong>za</strong> izbor nagrajenih izdelkov so bilanaslednja:– ustvarjalnost,– <strong>in</strong>ovativnost,– berljivost izdelka,– sporočilnost,– kompozicija (proporci, hierarhija, ritem, kontrast,poudarki, členjenje strukturnih elementov).Strokovna komisija se je odločila, da glede naveliko udeležbo <strong>in</strong> število izdelkov ter s tem tudiveliko število dobrih izdelkov podeli večje številonagrad, kot je bilo prvotno mišljeno. Vseh skupajje bilo podeljenih 95 nagrad: posamezniki 63nagrad, skup<strong>in</strong>e 19 nagrad, posebna priznanja<strong>za</strong> skup<strong>in</strong>e 13 nagrad. Posebna priznanja <strong>za</strong>skup<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> mentorje so bila podeljena <strong>za</strong>radiizjemnih ustvarjalnih dosežkov, enotnostiizdelkov skup<strong>in</strong>e, posebne metode dela terponekod tudi celovite predstavitve metode delaskup<strong>in</strong>e kot projekta.Nagrade so nam omogočili sponzorji s področjadržavne <strong>in</strong> lokalne uprave, muzejev, <strong>za</strong>ložb,knjigarn, vrtnarstva, podjetja s področjakraj<strong>in</strong>skega načrtovanja.photography. Children were asked to capture<strong>in</strong>dividual situations <strong>in</strong> the landscape, or <strong>in</strong>dividualcharacteristic landscape elements.The children were divided <strong>in</strong>to the follow<strong>in</strong>g agegroups:Group A: ages 4 to 6,Group B: ages 7 to 10, andGroup C: ages 11 to 15.5. Closure of the competition, selection of thebest works and awards (May 2005)The competition was attended by 90 primaryschools and 43 k<strong>in</strong>dergartens. Submitted were1029 art and photographic works <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 797draw<strong>in</strong>gs and pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, 22 models and 210photographs.The works were divided <strong>in</strong>to the follow<strong>in</strong>g categoriesby age group and technique:ARTS PHOTO. MODELSA age 4-6 343 37 7B age 7-10 258 15 5C age 11-15 196 158 9Total (1029) 797 210 22The motifs were ma<strong>in</strong>ly natural and cultural landscapes,city and urban landscapes, landscapepatterns that were presented also <strong>in</strong> an abstractmanner, children and school playgrounds, privategardens, <strong>in</strong>dividual landscape elements(trees, flowers, houses, hayracks, mills), and ofcourse, people and animals as landscape components.The panel of experts was composed of 10 persons,represent<strong>in</strong>g the Department for Landscapeof the University of Ljubljana, and landscapearchitects, members of SALA. The selectioncriteria were creativity, <strong>in</strong>novativeness, readability,the message conveyed, composition (proportions,hierarchy, rhythm, contrast, accents,articulation of structural elements).Awarded were 95 children, namely 63 for <strong>in</strong>dividualworks, 19 for the group works and 13 specialawards for groups. The latter were given togroups and mentor teachers for the outstand<strong>in</strong>gworks, unity of the group works, <strong>in</strong>novative workmethods, and sometimes for the comprehensivepresentation of the method by the group as aproject.311Delavnica 4 / Workshop 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!