evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

248Delavnica 3 / Workshop 3Politika, ki je prilagodljiva pri svojem preprojektiranju,ki se izogiba urbanim modelom, kiznova predlagajo standardne prostore v bližinicest, nekaj, kar je resnična priložnost, da se izraziizjemno banalnim in za bivanje neprimernimobmočjem.V italijanskih krajinah je čedalje več dokazov oprizadevanjih za izboljšanje krajine z majhnimi,vendar splošno razširjenimi projekti. Takšniprojekti morajo ostati decentralizirani, vendar jihmora spremljati, tudi s finančnega vidika,ponoven pregled (revizija) lokalnega financiranjacest, različnih delov mesta, kakor tudi vsehurbanih struktur, temelječ na logiki, ki ni avtoreferenčna,nagrajujoč ne nujno najboljšiprojekt, pač pa tiste, ki so najbolj zanimivi alisposobni izzvati posnemanje, da bi sprožili tokmojstrstva.Če se spomnimo starih priročnikov Ina-case alizakonodaje v zvezi s prispevki za izboljšanje, alicelo najbolj omejevalnih navedb za ‘urbanestandarde’, se dobro zavedamo, kako lokalna aliskupna prizadevanja dosežejo več, če jihpodpira stimulativna nacionalna politika. Izziv vtem primeru je izogniti se banalnemu‘opremljanju’ urbanih območij in vrsti prevečdrznih tehničnih rešitev. Zaželjeno je, da bi senaložbe zagotavljale na lokalni ravni in bileusmerjene v doseganje visoke ravni primernostiza življenje z izgradnjo bolj gostoljubnih odprtihin kolektivnih prostorov, in seveda, z varstvom tekompleksne in neprecenljivo dragocene javnedobrine, ki se imenuje krajina.In order to improve the Italian landscape wemust imagine a great plan that it is implementedthrough an ordinary public long term policy ofstrategic valences involving improvement ofroads, redefinition of roads, efficient water flow,creation of pavements and bicycle lanes, andmore generally, different systems of life styleregulated by different transport systems, largeparking areas, tree-lined avenues which, besidesbeing ecological take the third dimension backto the urban organisation which we still read onmaps.A policy that is flexible in its redesign, avoidingtraditional urban models which re-proposestandard spaces close to streets, something thatis a real opportunity to give expression to extraordinarilybanal and uninhabitable areas.In the Italian landscapes there is more and moreevidence of attempts at improving the landscapethrough small but widespread projects. Suchprojects must remain decentralised but must beaccompanied, also from a financial point of view,by a review of local funding for roads, variousparts of the town as well as entire urban structures,based on non auto-referential logic, awardingnot necessarily the best project but thosethat are the most interesting or able of to createan imitation in order to activate circuits of virtuosity.If we think back to the old handbooks of lna-casaor the legislation regarding contributions forimprovement, or even the most curtailing of indicationsfor ‘urban standards’ we are wellaware of how local or joint actions can achievemore when supported by a stimulating nationalpolicy. The challenge in this case is to avoid abanal ‘furnishing’ of urban areas and a series ofpresumptuous technical solutions. Preferably investmentsshould be provided at local level andoriented towards achieving a high level of liveabilityin the territory through the constructionof more hospitable open and collective spaces,and, of course, the protection of that complexand inestimably valuable public asset which isthe landscape.