evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

med regijami in mesti, ki bi se morale prilagoditiveliko različnim krajinskim prostorom in občasnospremembam, izvedenim na mah. To je boljvprašanje preoblikovanja (reforme) različnihdelov Italije, različnih suburbaniziranih območij,znotraj katerih bi morali nastati izvirni razvojnimodeli, da bi lahko ustvarili drugačno vlogo zainfrastrukturne objekte.Kot drugo bi morala obstajati destrukcijarekonstrukcijarazličnih krajin, kar pa ne sme bitiobravnavano le kot ublažitev vpliva, pravilenodnos do že obstoječih struktur ali varstvozadevnih krajin. Ti vidiki so osrednjega pomenasamo za nekatere primere, bolj pogosto paobstaja tveganje, da so zavajajoči pri prizadevanjihza ponoven razvoj in reinvencijo italijanskekrajine v nadaljnjem koraku ponovnegaoblikovanja infrastruktur italijanskega ozemlja.Projektiranje infrastrukturnih objektov zato nanašem ozemlju dobiva nekoliko drugačen urbanipomen.Na področjih obsežne in vsesplošne urbanizacijebi lahko preprojektiranje infrastrukturnihmrež, združeno s preprojektiranjem velikihodprtih prostorov znotraj urbanizacije, kakor tudiz obnovo starih centrov, ki delujejo na področjujavne blaginje in gospodarstva, prispevalo krojstvu novega tipa urbane krajine, ki temelji namodelu razširjenega, prepustnega mesta.Zlasti bi skupno delovanje na teh štirihdimenzijah predstavljalo priložnost za prenovo inponovno pretehtanje politike blaginje. Ta selahko, ne samo spopada z revščino, ki obstajacelo v teh razvitih okoljih, pač pa lahko prav takozagotovi udobno življenje za vse prebivalce, kimorajo živeti v sožitju z državo visoko razvitihgospodarskih sistemov, ki podpira področjalokalnih proizvodov, kar pogosto ovirajo zastojiin obotavljiva podjetja; vrh tega je treba razmislitio preoblikovanju nastajajočih urbanih območij,da bi povečali njihovo dostopnost.O cestnih infratrukturnih objektih bi moralirazmisliti v mnogih alpskih in predalpskihdolinah, v mestih Lombardije in Veneta, ki seneorganizirano širijo navzven vzdolž smeriEmilijanske ceste. Ne toliko o oblikovanju hitrihkoridorjev novih posamičnih infrastrukturnihobjektov, pač pa bolj dolgoročno, o novihavtocestah, cestah in železnicah, ki bi lahkopostale pomembni segmenti reorganizacijeof built up areas (but also of farming areas) andan increase in the variety of life styles, it representsboth a possible reference frame for thecreation of variegated landscapes in relation tobuilding areas, by providing consistency, and atool for linking micro-landscapes which may otherwiseremain cut off.These potentialities may only be expressed if twoconditions are met. First the infrastructureproject must be thought out within a differentimage of our country from that which implicitlyconstitutes a scheme of corridor links betweenregions and towns that would have to adapt toa diversity of territory-landscapes, and at timesto changes carried out in a clean sweep. Ratherit is a question of reforming different parts ofItaly, different suburbanised areas within whichoriginal development models should emerge tocreate a different role for the infrastructures.Secondly, there should be a destruction-reconstructionof different landscapes which is notmerely to be considered a mitigation of impact,a correct relationship with the pre-existing structures,or the protection of the landscapes involved.These aspects are central only to somecases, more often they risk being misleading inan attempt at redevelopment and reinvention ofthe Italian landscape carried out in a further actof remaking the infrastructures of the Italian territory.The design of (new) infrastructures thereforeassumes somewhat different urban significanceof our territory.In areas of extensive and widespread urbanizationthe redesigning of infrastructural networkscoupled with that of large open spaces insidethe urbanisation, as well as of renewal of oldcentres working in the field of public welfare andeconomy, could contribute to the birth of a newtype of urban landscape based on the model ofan extended, permeable city.In particular a joint action on these four dimensionsmay constitute an occasion for renewingand rethinking a welfare policy which can dealnot only with the poverty that exists even inthese developed environment, but can also providethe comfortable life for all the inhabitantsthat should co-exist with a state of highly developedeconomic systems assisting sectors of localproducts, often impeded by congestion and243Delavnica 3 / Workshop 3