evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

104Delavnica 1 / Workshop 1urbani krajini, prav tako pa ne smemo prezretivprašanja hitre rasti novih naselij.Zelo so mi bila všeč njegova razmišljanja okonceptu premoženjske vrednosti zgodovinskekrajine in njene občutljivosti.V svojih zaključnih besedah je opozoril, da bimorali ponovno obiskati problematične krajineiz preteklosti in se tako soočiti z enim največjihizzivov, obenem pa tudi stopiti v areno, v kateribomo lahko dokazali pravo vrednostdinamičnega pristopa k upravljanju krajine.G. Jean-François Seguin, predstavnik Francije zaEvropsko konvencijo o krajini, je prav takopoudaril nujnost dobrega razumevanja dinamikekrajine. Izpostavil je dejstvo, da v določenemsmislu nekatera območja sploh nisoobravnavana kot krajine, saj vso svojo pozornostnamenjamo privlačnejšim krajinam. Nato jenekaj besed posvetil ustrezni opredelitvi krajine.Opazil je, da se ta pristop vedno bolj razvija tudiv Franciji, saj se je začela ukvarjati z izzivi, kot jena primer načelo, da se meje krajine neprekrivajo z upravnimi mejami.Obenem je še poudaril pomen preučitve urbanekrajine in pozval k ureditvi prijetnegaživljenjskega prostora za večino populacije.Govoril je tudi o dojemanju in kako se lahko letomočno razlikuje v posameznih segmentihskupnosti.Postavil je težko vprašanje – kako lahko tarazlična dojemanja med seboj uskladimo. Pomembnoje, da ponovno ocenimo inprimerjamo dinamični proces in ga uskladimo zdinamiko krajine.V zaključnem delu nas je ga. Elina Veidemane,visoka uradnica na Oddelku za prostorskonačrtovanje latvijskega Ministrstva za regionalnirazvoj in lokalne oblasti, spomnila na konceptkrajine kot pripovedovalke zgodovine – krajina vsebi skriva veliko zgodb.Krajine izražajo vrednote in porajajo občutekpripadnosti.Čeprav je pomembno, da imamo na voljorazlična orodja, pa moramo krajini priznati tudikulturno vrednost.change to assist in our understanding of this keycharacteristic of the landscape and also identifyingcritical indicators.He noted that the whole issue of the publicrealm in urban landscape is in need of attentionand the question of the rapid growth of new settlementsis an important area for attention.I liked his references to the concept of historiclandscape character asset values and historiclandscape character sensitivity.His final point about the need to revisit the unsatisfactorylandscapes from the past as one ofthe great challenges we face but also one of thearenas where we are most likely to be able toprove the value of a dynamic landscape managementapproach.Mr. Jean-François Seguin Representative ofFrance for the European Landscape Convention,also talked about the need for us to understandthe dynamic of the landscape. He also highlightedthe fact that in a certain sense many areasare not regarded as being landscape at all.Where people tend to focus on the attractivelandscapes and therefore he moved on to theissue of an appropriate definition for landscape.He observed that the approach has been evolvingin France and challenges such as the issueof landscape boarder not coinciding with administrativeboarders are being addressed.He again stressed the need to look at the urbanlandscape and to create a good place to live forthe majority of the population.He talked about the question of perception alsoand how this can vary quite dramatically acrossdifferent sections of the community.He posed the difficult question as to how do wereconcile different perceptions. It is importantfor us to reassess and compare the dynamicprocess to match the dynamic of the landscape.In concluding the session Mrs. Elina VeidemaneMinistry of Regional Development and LocalGovernment, Senior Officer of Spatial PlanningDepartment, Latvia brought us back to the conceptof the landscape as a narrative of our history– the landscape has stories to tell.