13.07.2015 Views

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Brother Gorman stated that he would be unable to attend to this matter and that the <strong>State</strong>Treasurer be appointed in his stead. Brother McArdle stated that owing to the Treasurer beinglocated in Spokane, he was too far away to attend. Brother Smith <strong>of</strong> Everett was thereforeappointed in his stead., A motion was therefore made and carried that a Committee on By-Lawsto consist <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Secretary, <strong>State</strong> Advocate and Brother Smith <strong>of</strong> Everett be instructed todraft suitable by-laws and make a report at the next meeting.Brother Lyons made a motion which was seconded by Brother O'Brien that a committee <strong>of</strong> threebe appointed to draft resolutions levying a per capita tax against members to defray expenses <strong>of</strong>the <strong>State</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Brother Smith amended the motion which was seconded by Brother Noethethat this committee consist <strong>of</strong> six members, one member to be selected from each council. Uponthe motion being put before the <strong>Council</strong>, it was unanimously moved that the <strong>State</strong> Deputy beinstructed to appoint six members on this committee, one member to be selected from each<strong>Council</strong>. Carried. Brother Gorman appointed on this committee McArdle, Walsh, Lyons,Dunphy, Fagan and Noethe and granted the members a recess <strong>of</strong> five minutes in order that theymight make a report. Upon the <strong>Council</strong> being called to order, Brother Dunphy as Chairman <strong>of</strong>this committee reported that there were at present 417 members in the <strong>State</strong> and recommendedthat a per capita tax <strong>of</strong> $1.00 be levied on June 20th, 1904, said assessment to be paid to the<strong>State</strong> Treasurer on July 1st, 1904. He reported that the cost <strong>of</strong> transportation <strong>of</strong> the delegatesattending this convention to amount to $113.40, which sum was made up as follows: Spokane$50.00, Walla Walla $50.00, Bellingham $7.80, Tacoma $3.00, Everett $2.60. Upon motion byBrother Dunphy it was regularly moved and seconded that a per capita tax <strong>of</strong> $1.00 be leviedion June 20th, 1904 against all <strong>of</strong> the members whose names appear on the rosters <strong>of</strong> thevarious councils in the <strong>State</strong>, said tax to be paid to the <strong>State</strong> Treasurer July 1st, 1904. Carried.City for Holding Next Convention: Brother Kent made a motion that the next convention be heldeast <strong>of</strong> the mountains and set forth the nomination <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Spokane, to which Brother Fordseconded same. Brother Walsh put forth the City <strong>of</strong> Tacoma as the city for holding the nextconvention, his contention being that as most <strong>of</strong> the councils were located west <strong>of</strong> the mountainsit would be a less expense on the councils in the way <strong>of</strong> transportation, etc. Brother Smithsuggested that the Secretary call the roll <strong>of</strong> delegates for the purpose <strong>of</strong> voting on the city forholding the next convention to be held in May, 1905. Brother Dunphy raised some objection tothis procedure but the chair ruled that the delegates were at liberty to vote on any city wherein acouncil was located. Brother Lyons suggested that the delegates vote blanks on the nominations<strong>of</strong> Tacoma and Spokane, and upon roll call the balloting resulted in a blank vote. Brother Lyonsthen made a motion that we proceed to the nomination <strong>of</strong> cities for holding <strong>of</strong> the nextconvention. Brother Noethe set forth the City <strong>of</strong> Bellingham, Brother Walsh set forth the City <strong>of</strong>Tacoma, Brother O'Brien set forth the City <strong>of</strong> Spokane, same being seconded by Brother Ford.Brother Kline seconded Walsh's nomination for the City <strong>of</strong> Tacoma, Kent seconded motion onBrother O'Brien's for nomination <strong>of</strong> Spokane, Brother Noethe withdrew nomination <strong>of</strong>Bellingham and seconded motion <strong>of</strong> Brother Walsh that the City <strong>of</strong> Tacoma be selected for place<strong>of</strong> next convention. Brother Gorman declared the nominations closed and asked that theSecretary call the roll <strong>of</strong> delegates for the purpose <strong>of</strong> balloting on the cities nominated. Uponroll call, Dunphy, Kent, McArdle, O'Brien, Ford, Lyons and Gorman cast their votes forSpokane, and Noethe, Kline, Fagan, Smith, Walsh and Manion cast their voters for Tacoma,thirteen votes in all being cast, seven for Spokane and six for Tacoma. Upon notion by BrotherKline, seconded by Walsh, it was regularly moved that the selection <strong>of</strong> Spokane for holding thenext convention be declared unanimous. Carried.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!