13.07.2015 Views

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

WSC History - Knights of Columbus Washington State Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the standpoint <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> members and from the logistics <strong>of</strong> travel from an ever-widening areaencompassed by the Order. The Board <strong>of</strong> Directors changed in that the <strong>State</strong> Deputies were no longermembers. The Directors were to be chosen so as to form a compact group <strong>of</strong> management talent withoutreference to geographic distribution. Also in 1896, John J. Phelan was succeeded as Supreme Knight byMr. James E. Hayes. Mr. Hayes had great managerial skill and the Order had a large increase inmembership during the short time before his death in 1897. Deputy Supreme Knight John J. Cone <strong>of</strong>Jersey City succeeded him.National Organizer Cummings was sent to Chicago and on July 10, 1896 Chicago <strong>Council</strong> 182was instituted. From this base, the Order spread into surrounding territory. He was succeeded asNational Organizer by Mr. James J. Gorman <strong>of</strong> Fall River, Mass. Mr. Gorman did much work in theMiddle West. He brought the Order into Missouri in 1899 making it the twenty-first state jurisdiction tobe established. By 1900 the Order had reached into every section <strong>of</strong> the country except the Far West andthe Deep South. In 1899 Edward L. Hearn or Framingham, Mass. was elected as Supreme <strong>Knights</strong>ucceeding John J. Cone. He was the Supreme Knight for ten years.In 1901 the Board voted to expand to California and National Organizer James J. Gorman wassent there. He followed a pattern which was to be repeated in other states - most notably, our own state<strong>of</strong> <strong>Washington</strong>.He first visited the two largest cities <strong>of</strong> the state - San Francisco and Los Angeles - to meet withlocal Catholic leaders both clergy and laymen. He explained the aims, the Constitution and Laws, thestructure and methods <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Knights</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbus</strong>. It was an open question for some time as to whetherSan Francisco or Los Angeles would receive the first council. San Francisco was selected and, onJanuary 19, 1902, San Francisco <strong>Council</strong> 615 was instituted. It was followed one week later by LosAngeles <strong>Council</strong> 621.Mr. Gorman was obviously kept busy that year <strong>of</strong> 1902. He did much traveling the length <strong>of</strong>California to insure the growth <strong>of</strong> the two councils in San Francisco and Los Angeles and to insure thatthe third council needed for a <strong>State</strong> <strong>Council</strong> would be realized. In that same year he traveled to Portland,Oregon and to Seattle and Spokane in our own state.The first council in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Washington</strong> was Seattle <strong>Council</strong> 676 instituted on June 22, 1902and it was followed just one week later by Spokane <strong>Council</strong> 683 on June 29, 1902.The growth <strong>of</strong> these West Coast councils was steady and satisfactory - although not as rapid ascouncils in the east. This is undoubtedly due both to the smaller population in general and the smallerpercentage <strong>of</strong> Catholics in the population. Added to this consideration is a much greater dispersion <strong>of</strong>that smaller population over the vast areas <strong>of</strong> the Far West.It took fourteen months after the institution <strong>of</strong> San Francisco <strong>Council</strong> 615 to bring in Oxnard<strong>Council</strong> 750 in order to have a sufficient <strong>of</strong> councils and total membership to qualify as a <strong>State</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.In <strong>Washington</strong> <strong>State</strong>, it took until May 3, 1904 - almost two years after Seattle <strong>Council</strong> 676 wasinstituted. In Oregon, it took almost two years to bring in <strong>Council</strong> 849 in Baker, Oregon. The pattern inthe West was basically the same as in the East. It was to begin in the larger cities and then, as othercommunities observed the <strong>Knights</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbus</strong> in these cities, additional councils would be formed,spreading outward.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!