13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

water is present or to intertidal areas below <strong>the</strong> mean high watermark.6.1.5 Controls and variations to protect operators and workers6.1.5.1 ERMA New Zealand proposes that Use Scenarios 1 to 8 are prohibitedon <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unmanageable levels <strong>of</strong> risk posed to <strong>the</strong> environment.6.1.5.2 ERMA New Zealand notes that, while it might potentially be possible tomanage <strong>the</strong> non-negligible risks to operators and workers (e.g. throughuse <strong>of</strong> PPE, maximum application rates, use <strong>of</strong> engineeringtechnology),—<strong>the</strong> proposal arising from <strong>the</strong> environmental assessment means thatfur<strong>the</strong>r consideration is not required; andERMA New Zealand does not have <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation available to itto determine whe<strong>the</strong>r effective risk mitigation measures could beimplemented to protect human health.Use Scenarios 9 – 25: Indoor use (industrial)6.1.6 Controls to protect workers – greenhouse, mushroom house, warehouses6.1.6.1 Specified PPE/RPE:A minimum level <strong>of</strong> PPE is required to ensure <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> risk isnegligible. ERMA New Zealand considers that <strong>the</strong> risks to humanhealth from exposure to dichlorvos are sufficient that <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong>PPE required to ensure negligible risk should be prescribed.6.1.6.2 Remotely activated automated fogging/misting equipment:Use <strong>of</strong> automated equipment can reduce <strong>the</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> operatorsthrough use, by removing pathway <strong>of</strong> risk to operators.The equipment should be capable <strong>of</strong> being activated remotely toensure that no operators are required to be present in <strong>the</strong> treatmentarea to initiate application.6.1.6.3 Operational controls to restrict number <strong>of</strong> cylinder changes:For use <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos-containing gases, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cylinderchanges is a key factor in determining operator exposure;The assessment carried out has indicated that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>cylinder changes should be restricted to 1 cylinder change peroperator per day. ERMA New Zealand notes that a reduction inallowable cylinder changes could result in larger volume cylindersbeing used.Additionally, appropriate levels <strong>of</strong> PPE/RPE are required to ensurethat <strong>the</strong> operator exposure risks are negligible.6.1.6.4 Restriction <strong>of</strong> maximum application rates, mixing quantities and treatedareas:Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 77 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!