13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.4.4.3 Bystanders and children:The risks to bystanders (including children) from Use Scenarios 1to 8 are considered to be low.<strong>Application</strong> into enclosed spaces should only be carried out when<strong>the</strong> structure is clear <strong>of</strong> bystanders and appropriately sealed toprevent leakage. The risks to bystanders (including children) fromUse Scenarios 9 to 25 are, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, considered to be low. Venting<strong>of</strong> treated structures (intentional or inadvertent) would result in apoint-source emissions that ERMA New Zealand considers will beadequately dispersed by air movement so that bystanders are notexposued to hazardous concentrations <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos.Exposure <strong>of</strong> children through contact with treated surfaces arisingfrom domestic use <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos-containing insecticide treatments(Use Scenarios 26 to 29) are estimated to reflect <strong>the</strong> bystanders atgreatest risk, and are considered by ERMA New Zealand to be veryhigh, given that <strong>the</strong> RQ values are > 880. Additionally, ERMANew Zealand has not been able to determine an REI <strong>for</strong> child entryinto treated areas.The exposures that children from contact with treated public areas(Use Scenario 30) are considered by ERMA New Zealand to bevery high, with an RQ <strong>of</strong> 86.ERMA New Zealand semi-quantitatively assessed <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong>exposure to operators arising from <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> dichlorvosimpregnatedinsecticide strips (Use Scenario 31). Bystanders couldbe exposed to dichlorvos if <strong>the</strong>y are close to an open trap, whichcould result from deliberate action or vandalism. ERMA NewZealand notes that <strong>the</strong>se traps are placed on private property at least1.3m above ground, are labelled and <strong>the</strong> property owner is fullyin<strong>for</strong>med, providing some level <strong>of</strong> security against interference,vandalism or access by small children. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> an effectis considered to be minimal to major, depending on <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong>exposure. The likelihood <strong>of</strong> a major adverse health effect to amember <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public is considered to be highly improbable. Thelikelihood <strong>of</strong> a minimal adverse health effect to a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>public is considered to be unlikely at most. ERMA New Zealandconsiders <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> risk to bystanders and children is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>enegligible to low.4.5 Summary <strong>of</strong> exposure risks to <strong>the</strong> environment and humanhealth.4.5.1 A summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> risk to human health and <strong>the</strong> environment posed bydichlorvos-containing substances is detailed in Table 12.Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 54 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!