13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Exposure through contactwithcontaminatedsurfaces(cumulative)(mg/kg b.w./day)acChild‘s hand-to-mou<strong>the</strong>xposure a 0.0333Child‘s object-to-mou<strong>the</strong>xposure a 0.0083Child‘s soil ingestion b 0.0011Child‘s total exposure 1.2428 888UK CRD Bystander Exposure Guidance Document (2008b); b US EPA (2006b);Where: Dermal absorption = 30%; Inhalation absorption = 100%;RQ = Estimated Residential Exposure / AOEL where AOEL = 0.0014 mg/kg b.w./day; RQ > 1indicates <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> an unacceptable risk to those exposed.6.17 The calculated exposures will have been over-estimated in <strong>the</strong>se models, becauseno dissipation <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos has been factored in due to lack <strong>of</strong> relevantin<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos after <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> residentialhouses with furniture, s<strong>of</strong>t furnishings etc. (Scenarios 26 & 27). In <strong>the</strong> outdooruses (Scenarios 28 & 29) <strong>the</strong> treated surfaces could be anything from concrete(reported to cause rapid degradation) to wooden decks which may act as areservoir (Hussey & Hughes, 1963 in APVMA, 2008b).6.18 For public space application, children with <strong>the</strong>ir potential <strong>for</strong> high contact,exploratory nature and low body weight appear to be <strong>the</strong> most at risk, andavailable models will <strong>of</strong>fer worst-case exposure estimates.6.19 The models used previously (§ 6.5-6.8) to estimate children‘s exposure throughcontact with spray drift contaminated surfaces are used, assuming that <strong>the</strong> averagedrift value is 100% (i.e. <strong>the</strong> surface is directly sprayed and <strong>the</strong> spray remainswhere applied) and no dissipation occurs be<strong>for</strong>e and during <strong>the</strong> 2 hours <strong>of</strong> contact.[See Appendix 6 and Table XXII].Scenario (30) Indoor:Table XXII: Dichlorvos – Public Space Uses (1 hectare)Bystander Internal Exposure Estimates and Risk Assessment aExposure through contactwithcontaminatedsurfaces(cumulative)(mg/kg b.w./day)acExposure(mg/kg b.w./day)Child‘s dermalexposure a 0.104Child‘s hand-to-mou<strong>the</strong>xposure a 0.0133Child‘s object-to-mou<strong>the</strong>xposure a 0.0033Child‘s soil ingestion b 0.0001Risk Quotient(RQ) cChild‘s total exposure 0.1207 86UK CRD Bystander Exposure Guidance Document (2008b); b US EPA (2006b);Where: Dermal absorption = 30%; Inhalation absorption = 100%;RQ = Estimated Residential Exposure / AOEL where AOEL = 0.0014 mg/kg b.w./day; RQ > 1Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 339 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!