13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6BYSTANDER & RESIDENT EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENTBystander and resident exposure & risk assessment <strong>for</strong> outdoor usesIntroduction6.1 The main potential sources <strong>of</strong> exposure to <strong>the</strong> general public (bystander orresident) from dichlorvos (o<strong>the</strong>r than via food residues) is via spray drift at <strong>the</strong>time <strong>of</strong> application or from surfaces contaminated ei<strong>the</strong>r by spray drift or directtreatment. Bystander and resident exposures would tend to be intermittent incomparison to exposure <strong>of</strong> workers, who are handling <strong>the</strong> pesticide throughout <strong>the</strong>application. In addition, spray densities, and hence exposure levels drop <strong>of</strong>f withdistance from spraying operations.6.2 TCL notes that any potential bystanders or residents will not be directly handling<strong>the</strong> substance, and <strong>the</strong>y will not be wearing PPE. [Note: amateur, home users arenot considered bystanders or residents while using pesticides.]6.3 UK CRD Bystander Exposure Guidance Document (UK CRD, 2008b) givesmodels <strong>for</strong> estimating bystander exposure in three circumstances:• Exposure from spray drift at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> application;• Exposure from inhalation <strong>of</strong> pesticide which volatilises from <strong>the</strong> crop or soilsurface after <strong>the</strong> application has been made; and• Exposure through contact with spray drift contaminated surfaces.6.4 Of <strong>the</strong>se options, <strong>the</strong> Agency has advised TCL that <strong>the</strong> first two approachesshould not be used due to concerns about <strong>the</strong>se models. The UK CRD model <strong>for</strong>exposure through contact with spray drift contaminated surfaces (UK CRD,2008b) is used with <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US EPA model estimate <strong>of</strong> spray driftcontaminated soil/grass ingestion by young children (US EPA, 2006b).Children’s dermal exposure (UK CRD, 2008b)6.5 Systemic exposures via <strong>the</strong> dermal route were calculated using <strong>the</strong> UK CRD(2008b) default drift fallout values (1% from boom sprayers (Scenarios 1-4); 10%from air-assisted sprayers (Scenarios 5 & 6)) and <strong>the</strong> following equation:SE(d) = AR x DF x TTR x TC x H x DA / BWWhere:SE(d) = systemic exposure via <strong>the</strong> dermal routeAR = field application rate (μg/cm 2 )DF = drift fallout valueTTR = turf transferable residuesTC = transfer coefficientH = exposure duration <strong>for</strong> a typical day (hours) – this has been assumed tobe 2 hours which matches <strong>the</strong> 75th percentile <strong>for</strong> toddlers playing on grassDichlorvos reassessment – application Page 333 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!