13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Re-entry into treated enclosed industrial spaces (Scenarios 17-23)5.67 The APVMA used a study by Sch<strong>of</strong>ield (1993; Original not sighted) <strong>for</strong> data ondichlorvos behaviour after fogging industrial buildings (APVMA, 2008b). Thestudy was carried out in a large industrial building fogged to a targetconcentration <strong>of</strong> 85 mg/m 3 . The airborne dichlorvos levels were measured <strong>for</strong> 6hours, and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> building was ventilated <strong>for</strong> one hour be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce reentered.The half-life <strong>of</strong> airborne dichlorvos over <strong>the</strong> first dissipation phase was1.6 hours. The author‘s regression analysis <strong>of</strong> L n concentration vs time gave <strong>the</strong>Y intercept at 2.996 (or ln [20] mg/m 3 ) and <strong>the</strong> slope [<strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>dichlorvos] was -0.4207/hour. [Sch<strong>of</strong>ield‘s analysis expressed <strong>the</strong> result innatural logarithms.] Sch<strong>of</strong>ield‘s data indicated that <strong>the</strong> dissipation half-life <strong>of</strong>dichlorvos after ventilation slowed to 12.7 hours. [TCL notes <strong>the</strong> finding isunexpected.] The regression analysis <strong>of</strong> L n concentration vs time gave <strong>the</strong> slope[<strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos] as -0.0544/hour. The R 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second phaseanalysis was 0.74 (first phase, 0.98) indicating considerably more variability anduncertainty in <strong>the</strong> latter values, which may explain <strong>the</strong> finding.5.68 The APVMA (2008b) noted that, based on Sch<strong>of</strong>ield‘s data, after an application<strong>of</strong> RTU gas at <strong>the</strong> Australian label rate <strong>of</strong> 33 mg/m 3 into industrial buildings atoxicologically unacceptable level <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos would persist <strong>for</strong> 3 days, but aREI <strong>of</strong> 4 days could be supportable. However, as <strong>the</strong> New Zealand use rate is 50mg/m 3 , even a 4-day REI may not be supported. Risks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Zealandapplication rate are estimated fur<strong>the</strong>r below (see Tables XVIII & XIX).5.69 It should be noted that product labels (Nuvos, P001132; Divap, P006080)recommend that treated enclosed spaces should be kept closed <strong>for</strong> 10-12 hoursbe<strong>for</strong>e ventilation, and ano<strong>the</strong>r 10-12 hours should elapse be<strong>for</strong>e recommencingwork in <strong>the</strong> buildings.REI <strong>for</strong> workers ventilating industrial buildings after treatment at 50 mg/m 3 :5.70 As <strong>the</strong> main New Zealand use rate is 50 mg dichlorvos/m 3 <strong>for</strong> industrial buildings<strong>the</strong> application rate will be approximately 59% <strong>the</strong> rate used in <strong>the</strong> Sch<strong>of</strong>ieldstudy. The regression plot intercept is adjusted downwards to 2.465 (L n [20 x0.588]) while <strong>the</strong> same slope (-0.4207/h) has been assumed. [Sch<strong>of</strong>ield‘s analysisexpressed <strong>the</strong> result in natural logarithms.]5.71 Taking <strong>the</strong> initial decline in dichlorvos levels, <strong>the</strong> airborne concentration <strong>of</strong>dichlorvos at 10 hours will be:e (2.465 + [-0.4207 x 10]) = 0.175 mg/m 35.72 Re-entering <strong>the</strong> treated building to ventilate it would expose <strong>the</strong> worker byinhalation at approximately 0.175 mg/m 3 . If <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> exposure was 30minutes, <strong>the</strong> worst-case upper limit, <strong>the</strong> inhalation exposures with various RPEwould be <strong>the</strong> values set out in Table XVIII:Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 327 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!