13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and peas 20 minutes after application (Casida et al., 1962; Original not sighted;APVMA, 2008b).5.10 Using <strong>the</strong> Casida et al. (1962) data a general DFR t (μg/cm 2 /kg a.i./ha) value canbe derived <strong>for</strong> dichlorvos using <strong>the</strong> equation (US EPA, 1997):DFR t = (AR x F) x (1-D) t x CF2 x CF3where:AR = application rate (kg/ha);F = fraction <strong>of</strong> a.i. retained on foliage (unitless);D = fraction <strong>of</strong> residue that dissipates daily (unitless);t = post-application day on which exposure is being assessed;CF2 = conversion factor to convert <strong>the</strong> kg a.i. in <strong>the</strong> application rate to μg<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> DFR value (1 x 10 9 μg/kg);CF3 = conversion factor to convert <strong>the</strong> surface area units (ha) in <strong>the</strong>application rate to cm 2 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> DFR value (1 x 10 -8 ha/cm 2 if <strong>the</strong> applicationrate is per hectare).Using Casida et al. data: 5% remains on surface at 20 mins, F = 0.05;D is not needed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se scenarios as <strong>the</strong> exposure is assumed to occur on<strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> application after residue has dried;DFR t = (1 x 0.05) x 1E9 x 1E-8 = (1 x 0.05) x 10= 0.5 μg/cm 2 per kg a.i./haTransfer coefficient (TC)5.11 The transfer <strong>of</strong> residues from <strong>the</strong> plant surface to <strong>the</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>s or skin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workercan be regarded as more or less independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> product applied and <strong>the</strong>level <strong>of</strong> exposure will depend on <strong>the</strong> intensity and duration <strong>of</strong> contact with <strong>the</strong>foliage. This is also determined by <strong>the</strong> nature and duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activity duringre-entry. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is possible to group various crop habitats and re-entryactivities. The EUROPOEM Group recommended indicative TC values <strong>for</strong>potential dermal exposure <strong>for</strong> four different harvesting scenarios. For o<strong>the</strong>r reentryscenarios, TC data may be extrapolated where <strong>the</strong> scenarios are consideredto be comparable, i.e. <strong>the</strong> intensity and duration <strong>of</strong> contact with <strong>the</strong> foliage issimilar (UK CRD, 2008a).5.12 Three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TC values in <strong>the</strong> European guidance documents were applicable todichlorvos use on outdoor crops: tasks in vegetable crops, 2500 cm 2 /hr; tasks infruit trees, 4500 cm 2 /hr; and, tasks in berry crops, 3000 cm 2 /hr.Predicted worker dermal exposures (D)5.13 Predicted dermal exposure <strong>for</strong> this scenario based on <strong>the</strong> UK CRD equation(modified by adding a factor <strong>for</strong> dermal absorption and dividing by <strong>the</strong> worker‘sbody weight) gives:Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 310 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!