13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“Comment: These incidents clearly illustrate <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> dichlorvos tocause toxicity via <strong>the</strong> dermal route. Dermal absorption may have beenenhanced by <strong>the</strong> mineral spirits/organic solvents in which <strong>the</strong> dichlorvoswas diluted. Given that dichlorvos is a slight skin irritant and was present atonly 1 or 5%, <strong>the</strong> dermal reactions were probably caused by <strong>the</strong> solvents.‖(Originals not sighted; APVMA, 2008b)The APVMA (2008a) also reported:In ATSDR (1997):―Gold RE & Holcslaw (1984) Dermal and respiratory exposure <strong>of</strong>applicators and residents to dichlorvos-treated residences. In: Dermalexposure related to pesticide use: discussion <strong>of</strong> risk assessment (RCHoneycutt, G Zwerg & N Ragsdoleet eds). American chemical SocietySymposum Series No. 273.―Materials and Methods―Two applicators were monitored <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir exposure to dichlorvos during <strong>the</strong>treatment <strong>of</strong> twenty singlefamily residences with a 0.5% water-emulsionspray prepared from Vaponite 2EC (unspecified source and batch/lot No.;24.7%). The application rate was 0.19 g/m 2 dichlorvos (38.7 mL/m 2 spray)and <strong>the</strong> average residence size was 103±33 m 2 . Temperature and humiditywere 26.1°C and 82%, respectively. The spray was applied along <strong>the</strong>baseboards, doorways, windows, all entrances, <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> sink, stove andrefrigerator, shelves, cabinets and around plumbing and utility installations.Residents were advised not to re-enter <strong>the</strong>ir premise <strong>for</strong> two hours.“Conclusions: This study suggested that toxicologically-significantexposure <strong>of</strong> applicators and residents can occur during and immediatelyfollowing <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> dichlorvos. Although this study had somedeficiencies (such as <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> reporting detail and <strong>the</strong> small sample sizes),it had qualitative value <strong>for</strong> risk assessment purposes.‖ (Originals notsighted; APVMA, 2008a)“In an intermediate-duration 21-day study in which volunteers weregiven dichlorvos orally, no signs <strong>of</strong> neurological toxicity were seen atdoses <strong>of</strong> 0.033 mg/kg [b.w.]/day (Boyer et al. 1977). Twenty-four malevolunteers had <strong>the</strong>ir serum cholinesterase and erythrocyteacetylcholinesterase determined twice a week <strong>for</strong> 3 weeks to establish<strong>the</strong>ir baseline levels. They were <strong>the</strong>n given 0.9 mg dichlorvos 3 times aday <strong>for</strong> 21 days in ei<strong>the</strong>r a pre-meal capsule or a 3-ounce container <strong>of</strong>gelatin. Serum cholinesterase and erythrocyte acetylcholinesterasewere measured twice a week during <strong>the</strong> exposure period. Once a week,each volunteer had his vital signs measured, and was examined <strong>for</strong>tremor, pupillary response to light, and skin moisture. Following.<strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, serum cholinesterase and erythrocyteacetylcholinesterase were measured weekly <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> next seven weeks.No clinical signs <strong>of</strong> neurological toxicity were observed in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Dichlorvos reassessment – application Page 251 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!