13.07.2015 Views

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from Charles River Laboratories (CRL) (1996) revealed that <strong>the</strong> femalefertility indices <strong>of</strong> 55% (F 2a ) and 50% (F 2b ) were below <strong>the</strong> averagehistorical control range <strong>of</strong> 60-100%. In both litters, <strong>the</strong> pregnancy index waslower at 80 ppm than in <strong>the</strong> control, suggesting that female fecundity wasreduced with treatment. The number <strong>of</strong> females with live litters was alsoreduced at 80 ppm (both litters), with an apparent increase in <strong>the</strong> stillbirthindex in <strong>the</strong> F 2b litter. The latter was outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historical control range<strong>of</strong> 0-10.2% (CRL 1996). Marginal reductions in pup survival (day 7) and <strong>the</strong>lactation index were noted in both litters but were not considered treatmentrelated.All o<strong>the</strong>r reproduction and lactation indices were unremarkable.Offspring (F 2a and F 2b )At 80 ppm, F 2a pup weights (males and females) were 5-15% lower than <strong>the</strong>controls during <strong>the</strong> entire lactation period [postnatal days 1 (5%), 4 (15%), 7(14%), 14 (12%) and 21 (9%)]. At 80 ppm, F 2b pup weights were also lowerthan <strong>the</strong> controls during <strong>the</strong> lactation period, with a greater effect seen inmales than females [at postnatal days 4 (11/14% M/F), 7 (18/7% M/F), 14(16/3% M/F) and 21 (14/2% M/F)]. Although none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> findings in F2pups were statistically significant, <strong>the</strong> consistent trend at 80 ppm in bothlitters and with <strong>the</strong> effects seen in F 1 pups means that this effect on pupweight can not be discounted. There were no treatment-related clinical signsobserved in pups during lactation. Macroscopic examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10pups/sex/dose designated <strong>for</strong> necropsy revealed no treatment relatedabnormalities.• Parental NOAEL =• Parental LOAEL =5 ppm <strong>for</strong> males and females (~0.5 mg/kg bw/d);20 ppm <strong>for</strong> male and female rats based on inhibition<strong>of</strong> plasma, RBC and brain ChE activities (~2 mg/kgbw/d).• Reproductive NOAEL = 20 ppm (~2 mg/kg bw/d);• Reproductive LOAEL = 80 ppm based on reduced fertility and pregnancyindices, increased stillbirths in <strong>the</strong> F2 generation, anda reduction in cycling concomitant with an increasein abnormal cycling in F1 maternal rats (~8 mg/kgbw/d).• Offspring NOAEL =• Offspring LOAEL =• GLP: US EPA, 40 CFR Part 160;20 ppm (~2 mg/kg bw/d);80 ppm based on lower pup weights in bothgenerations (~8 mg/kg bw/d).• Test Guideline:US EPA OPPTS 870.3800; OECD;• Reference source: Tyl RW, Myers CB & Marr MC (1992) ―Two-generationreproductive toxicity study <strong>of</strong> DDVP administered in <strong>the</strong>drinking water to CD® (Sprague-Dawley) rats.‖ RTI IDNo. 60C-4629-170. Lab: Reproductive and DevelopmentalToxicology Laboratory, Centre <strong>for</strong> Life Sciences andDichlorvos reassessment – application Page 212 <strong>of</strong> 436

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!