13.07.2015 Views

PCAOB Inspection Report of Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, P.C. (2/9 ...

PCAOB Inspection Report of Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, P.C. (2/9 ...

PCAOB Inspection Report of Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, P.C. (2/9 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1666 K Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 207-9100Facsimile: (202) 862-8430www.pcaobus.org<strong>Inspection</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong> <strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.C.Issued by thePublic Company Accounting Oversight BoardFebruary 9, 2005<strong>PCAOB</strong> RELEASE NO. 104-2005-006


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2005-006Notes Concerning this <strong>Report</strong>1. Portions <strong>of</strong> this report may describe deficiencies or potential deficiencies in thesystems, policies, procedures, practices, or conduct <strong>of</strong> the firm that is the subject<strong>of</strong> this report. The express inclusion <strong>of</strong> certain deficiencies and potentialdeficiencies, however, should not be construed to support any negative inferencethat any other aspect <strong>of</strong> the firm's systems, policies, procedures, practices, orconduct is approved or condoned by the Board or judged by the Board to complywith laws, rules, and pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards.2. Any references in this report to violations or potential violations <strong>of</strong> law, rules, orpr<strong>of</strong>essional standards should be understood in the supervisory context in whichthis report was prepared. Any such references are not a result <strong>of</strong> an adversarialadjudicative process and do not constitute conclusive findings <strong>of</strong> fact or <strong>of</strong>violations for purposes <strong>of</strong> imposing legal liability. Similarly, any descriptionherein <strong>of</strong> a firm's cooperation in addressing issues constructively should not beconstrued, and is not construed by the Board, as an admission, for purposes <strong>of</strong>potential legal liability, <strong>of</strong> any violation.3. Board inspections encompass, among other things, whether the firm has failed toidentify departures from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") inits audits <strong>of</strong> financial statements. This report's descriptions <strong>of</strong> such auditingfailures necessarily involve descriptions <strong>of</strong> the related GAAP departures. TheBoard, however, has no authority to prescribe the form or content <strong>of</strong> an issuer'sfinancial statements. That authority, and the authority to make bindingdeterminations concerning an issuer's compliance with GAAP, rests with theSecurities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission"). Anydescription, in this report, <strong>of</strong> perceived departures from GAAP should not beunderstood as an indication that the Commission has considered or made anydetermination regarding these GAAP issues unless otherwise expressly stated.


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2005-006INSPECTION OF GELFOND HOCHSTADT PANGBURN, P.C.The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("<strong>PCAOB</strong>" or "theBoard") has conducted an inspection <strong>of</strong> the registered public accounting firm<strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong> <strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.C. ("the Firm"). The Board is issuing this report<strong>of</strong> that inspection in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Sarbanes-Oxley Act<strong>of</strong> 2002 ("the Act").The Act restricts the Board from publicly disclosing portions <strong>of</strong> aninspection report that discuss certain types <strong>of</strong> deficiencies or certain othernonpublic information. 1/ Because the inspection did not identify instances <strong>of</strong> suchdeficiencies, and because the report does not otherwise disclose protectedinformation, the Board is making the entire report available to the public.1/The Board has elsewhere described in detail its approach tomaking inspection-related information publicly available consistent with legalrestrictions. See Statement Concerning the Issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>Report</strong>s,<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2004-001 (August 26, 2004).


PART I<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2005-006<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong><strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.C.February 9, 2005Page 2INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND CERTAIN OBSERVATIONSMembers <strong>of</strong> the Board's inspection staff ("the inspection team") conductedfieldwork for the inspection from October 4, 2004 to October 14, 2004. Thefieldwork included procedures tailored to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Firm, certain aspects<strong>of</strong> which are summarized as follows:Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficesOwnership structure1 (Denver, Colorado)Colorado pr<strong>of</strong>essional corporationNumber <strong>of</strong> partners 11Number <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff 2/ 37Number <strong>of</strong> issuer audit clientsat date <strong>of</strong> inspection 21Board inspections are designed to identify and address weaknesses anddeficiencies related to how a firm conducts audits. To achieve that goal, Boardinspections include reviews <strong>of</strong> certain aspects <strong>of</strong> selected audits performed bythe firm and reviews <strong>of</strong> other matters related to the firm's quality control system.In the course <strong>of</strong> reviewing aspects <strong>of</strong> selected audits, an inspection mayidentify ways in which a particular audit is deficient, including failures by the firmto identify, or to address appropriately, respects in which an issuer's financialstatements do not present fairly the financial position, results <strong>of</strong> operations, orcash flows <strong>of</strong> the issuer in conformity with GAAP. It is not the purpose <strong>of</strong> aninspection, however, to review all <strong>of</strong> a firm's audits or to identify every respect in2/"Pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff" means all personnel <strong>of</strong> the Firm, exceptpartners or shareholders and administrative support personnel. The number <strong>of</strong>partners and pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff is provided here as an indication <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> theFirm, and does not necessarily represent the number <strong>of</strong> the Firm's pr<strong>of</strong>essionalswho participate in audits <strong>of</strong> issuers or are "associated persons" (as defined in theAct) <strong>of</strong> the Firm.


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2005-006<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong><strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.C.February 9, 2005Page 3which a reviewed audit is deficient. Accordingly, a Board inspection reportshould not be understood to provide any assurance that the firm's audits, or itsissuer clients' financial statements, are free <strong>of</strong> any deficiencies not specificallydescribed in an inspection report.A. Review <strong>of</strong> Audit EngagementsThe scope <strong>of</strong> the inspection procedures performed included reviews <strong>of</strong>certain aspects <strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> four <strong>of</strong> the Firm's audits <strong>of</strong> the financialstatements <strong>of</strong> issuers. The inspection team did not discover anything that itconsidered to be an audit deficiency that warrants discussion in a Boardinspection report.B. Review <strong>of</strong> Quality Control SystemIn addition to evaluating the quality <strong>of</strong> the audit work performed on specificaudits, the inspection included review <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>of</strong> the Firm's practices, policiesand procedures related to audit quality. This review encompassed practices,policies and procedures concerning training, compliance with independencestandards, client acceptance and retention, and the establishment <strong>of</strong> policies andprocedures. The inspection team did not identify anything that it considered tobe a quality control defect that warrants discussion in a Board inspection report.END OF PART I


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2005-006<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong><strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.C.February 9, 2005Page 4PART IIRESPONSE OF THE FIRM TO DRAFT INSPECTION REPORTPursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7214(f), and <strong>PCAOB</strong>Rule 4007(a), the Board provided the Firm an opportunity to review and commenton a draft <strong>of</strong> this report. The Firm provided a written response.Pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 4007(b), if a firmrequests, and the Board grants, confidential treatment for any <strong>of</strong> the firm'scomments on a draft report, the Board does not include those comments in thefinal report. The Board routinely grants confidential treatment, if requested, forany <strong>of</strong> a firm's comments that identify factually inaccurate statements in the draftthat the Board corrects in the final report.Pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 4007(b), the Firm'sresponse, minus any portion granted confidential treatment, is attached heretoand made part <strong>of</strong> this final inspection report.END OF PART II


ff<strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong> <strong>Pangburn</strong>, P.c.Certifed Public Accountants and ConsultantsDecember 16, 2004Mr. Geroge H. DiacontDirectorDivision <strong>of</strong> Registrations and <strong>Inspection</strong>sPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board1666 K Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20006Re: Response to Draft <strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong>Dear Mr. Diacont:Weare pleased to provide our response to the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard's (<strong>PCAOB</strong>'s) draft report on its 2004 inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gelfond</strong> <strong>Hochstadt</strong> <strong>Pangburn</strong>,P.C.We have no comments on the draft report. We would like to take this opportunity tothank the <strong>PCAOB</strong> and its team <strong>of</strong> inspectors for the pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism demonstrated duringthe inspection <strong>of</strong> our Firm. We remain committed to the highest level <strong>of</strong> audit quality,integrity and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism and look forward to the continuing contribution that we andthe <strong>PCAOB</strong> can make to our pr<strong>of</strong>ession.Sincerely,Gelfo OChstadtØ~P.C.LDonald D. Pangbur, CP AtDirector1670 Broadway. Suite 3000 . Denver, Colorado 80202Ph 303-831-5000 . Fx 303-831-5032 . www.ghpcpa.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!