Literature review of Porirua Harbour and catchmentAppendix 2: Annotated Bibliographyareas of saltmarsh in the process. The ecology of Pauatahanui Inlet is consideredsufficiently fragile that small alterations will require detailed impact analysis.Fuller, S. and M. Wassilieff (1995). Designaiio, I of Inland Route (Transmission Gully)..Assessnieniojecologicalinipucis. Beca S<strong>to</strong>vens, Welling10n.Southern section of proposed route modified since EIA (WRC1989a) requiring newassessment of this section. The majority of the proposed inland route lies within the subcatchmentsof Pauaiahanui Inlet and will impact on the downstream values of thesecatchments and on the inletitself. The new southern route was surveyed and 14 sitesidentified which would be affected (3 bush remnants, 4 streams, 2 regenerating bushsites, 5 estuarine wetlands of which 4 are wildlife reserves). Each site is described andtype of impact discussed. Recommendations givenGardiner, L. and B. Armstrong (2007). Idenijjj, ing sensiiive receiving eiiviroitn?enis at riskf^omroad runoy: Land Transport NZ Research, Report N" 315.GIS-based <strong>to</strong>ol for identifying and ranking sensitive receiving environments at risk fromroad runoff. The potential for contanitnation is estimated from traffic, congestion, cartype etc. POTirua Harbour was used as a pilot study. Identifies which parts of the estuaryare most at risk from road runoff and which parts of the road network contribute <strong>to</strong> thatrisk. End of Onepo<strong>to</strong> Arm identified as a significant 'hotspoi', due <strong>to</strong> cumulative effec<strong>to</strong>f 5 sub-catchments with moderate-high traffic density (starling at Cannons Creek)Harford, B. (ed) (1990). Audit o11he 'Future Sidle Highway One ROMie' environntenialiiiipac!yepori. Volume I. Main Repori. <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong>, Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for theEnvironment. Te Kaniaki Taiao a Te Whare ParemataReview of applicant's Environmental Impact Report, and its adequacy. Includes publicsubmissions. Appendix of submitted questions put <strong>to</strong> <strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> RegionalCouncil and Transit NZ and their responses. Reports from transport planning consultantsand social impact consultants.Maunse11 (2005). Planning balunce sheet assessnieni. WeSIer, I Corridor nunsporiuiioit SIudyMaunsell Ltd. for <strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> Regional Council and Transit New ZealandA Planning Balance Sheet for the SHI options. Includes expert assessments of impac<strong>to</strong>n: air quality, noise, landscape, ecology, built heritage, archaeology, severance,community disruption and active travelPCE (1993). Managenieni o1 Ihe eiiviron, ,Ten!nl atec!s of coinmerciullopsoil reinoval dnd July"farmi, 28 by Ihe Poriruo Cify Council. <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong>, Parliamentary Commissioner for theEnvironment.Summarises <strong>to</strong>psoil removal and turf farming activities, including the development ofinterim guidelines by <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> Regional Council(1990). Comments on POTirua CityCouncil management of environmental effects assessment and moni<strong>to</strong>ring. Concludesthat <strong>to</strong>psoil removal and turf farming both have potential <strong>to</strong> cause significant adverseenvironmental effects, butthatthese can be minimisedStirling, J. J. (1983). Manu Mai'Ina. ' on environiiteiim1 1171paci assessi, Ieni. Wetting<strong>to</strong>n, NewZealand, Beca Carter Honings and Ferner LtdEIA of the proposed Maria Marina, <strong>to</strong> fulfillegal requirements for approval from theMinistry of Transport. Presents development proposal, including engineering diagramsand rational for the development, as there is a need for safe mooring facilities outside ofthe main channel. Details mooring proposals, launching facilities etc MainReportfor Porirua City Council & <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> City CouncilBlaschke and Rutherford Environmental ConsultantsFebruary 201042
*Literature review of Porirua Harbour and catchmentAppendix 2: Annotated Bibliographyconsiderations for EIA are sediment transport and hydrodynamics, the impact on floraand fauna, noise and aesthetic values. Prior <strong>to</strong> Marina, ebb and flood tide currents causesediments <strong>to</strong> be deposited in the locality of the marina, which the Maria Cruising Clubhas dredged since 1963. Brief description of main ebb and flood currents in POTiruaHarbour. A net gain in sediment deposited at the marina site is interpreted as equating <strong>to</strong>the net loss of sediment from Ngati<strong>to</strong>a Domain. The erosion of the beach at Ngati<strong>to</strong>aDomain (at a rate of 1.1m per year)is caused by the railway embankment interrupting thenatural sand circulation pattern by acting as a reflec<strong>to</strong>r, keeping sand in suspension andpreventing accumulation in front of the embankment. EIA states that the marina wouldamenorate this erosion as major dredging would cease and sand would be made moreavailable <strong>to</strong> local beaches. Lists fauna found at the site. All species found elsewhere inPOTirua Harbour are either absent or in few numbers at the marina site, most likely due <strong>to</strong>past dredging activities. Therefore impact on local fauna would be minimalSynergy (1987). Poriruu Sired11/1/00d 1,111igaiion. Eitvii'o11nieiiial I'llpact Assessiiient. Phase Iyepori. Sche, ?Ie opiions assessnieiii. Synergy Applied Research Ltd. for the Welling10n RegionalCouncilSummary of findings on POTirua Stream flooding problems. Focus on feasible means 10mitigate the impact of flooding, including assessment of design options. Proposal fordetention dams and considers cost, maintenance and access for aquatic speciesConcluded that detention darns at Belmont and SIGbbings had the least adverseenvironmental impact.TDG, BECA, Davy-RJ and Rivers-Buchan (1992). Parentala Roodiitg Op!ions. Unpublishedreport, held at GWRC library, prepared by Traffic Design Group Ltd. , Beca Carter Honings andFerner Ltd. , R. IDavy and Associates, Rivers Buchan Associates.Considers options for traffic congestion at Maria and Paremata. Covers communityconsultation, the planning environment, (routes, traffic, network options and designs),social impacts, structural assessment of the Paremata Bridge.RFA (1993). Enviroiti?Ieniul jiltpuci nssessi, Teiji of proposed uggi'egute exii'aciioit. ' KP and LPW/lane, Mumhys Road, POWn!ahuiiui. Unpublished report, Resource Planning AssociatesLand owners seeking a land use consent <strong>to</strong> extract aggregate from a 42ha area of their318ha farm at the <strong>to</strong>p end of Murphys Road. Describes environmental effects of theproposed activityWRC (1989b). Land and cousin! jiltpuci assess, ,lent. <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> Regional Council, Technicalreport N" 7.Supporting technical document <strong>to</strong> Environment Impact Report on future SHI route(WRC, 1989a), as part of the <strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> Area Land Use and Transport StrategicReview (GATS). The report is in five parts, covering seismological hazards, slope andstability and erosion assessment land use and land use opportunities, coastal sedimentaryprocesses, and engineering geological appraisal.WRC (1989d). Technicul I'eporiN"' 8. Water Resource InIPuciAssessmenis, <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> RegionalCouncil.Supporting documentation <strong>to</strong> the formalEIR for future SHIToute (WRC 1989a). Coversfreshwater quality and biology, hydrology and coastal and marine biological evaluation,highlighting the present situation and potential impact. Lists species of fish,macroinvertebrates. MapssubcatchmentsReportfor Porirua City Council & <strong>Welling<strong>to</strong>n</strong> City CouncilBlaschke and Rutherford Environmental ConsultantsFebruary 20.043
- Page 5 and 6: ,,Literature review of Porirua Harb
- Page 7 and 8: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 9 and 10: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 11 and 12: ILiterature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 13 and 14: ,Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 15 and 16: .Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 17 and 18: ,Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 19 and 20: ,Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 21 and 22: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 23 and 24: ,Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 25 and 26: , .iLiterature review of Porirua Ha
- Page 27 and 28: ';Literature review of Porirua Harb
- Page 29 and 30: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 31 and 32: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 33 and 34: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 35 and 36: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 37 and 38: Literature review of Porirua Harbou
- Page 39 and 40: I,-Literature review of Porirua Har
- Page 41: ,Literature review of Porirua Harbo
- Page 45 and 46: ,.Literature review of Porirua Harb
- Page 47 and 48: , ,Literature review of Porirua Har