13.07.2015 Views

DRAFT: US-JAPAN PBEE PAPER BY CORDOVA ... - PEER

DRAFT: US-JAPAN PBEE PAPER BY CORDOVA ... - PEER

DRAFT: US-JAPAN PBEE PAPER BY CORDOVA ... - PEER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

involves reducing element stiffness and strengths as a function of the cumulative damage indicesand incorporating the residual (permanent) building drift into the structural topology. (3)Reanalyze the modified structural model through a second-order inelastic static analysis undergravity loads up its inelastic stability limit. The resulting stability index, λ u in Fig. 5, is definedas the ratio of the vertical load capacity to the applied gravity loads, where the gravity loads areassumed as full dead load plus 25% of the live load.The stability index, λ u , provides a global failure criterion that integrates the effect of localdamage sustained under each earthquake record and intensity. Figure 5 shows the evolution ofthe stability index for the six-story RCS space frame, where there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween stability points in Fig. 5 and the maximum interstory drifts in Fig. 4. The initial valueof λ uo = 5.5 (on the horizontal axis in Fig. 5) is the index for the undamaged structure, implyingthat the undamaged frame has sufficient lateral strength/stiffness to maintain stability under 5.5times the gravity load. This large value reflects the fact that the structure has significant gravityloadoverstrength as a result of the high seismic loads. The point where the curves cross λ u =1.0is point at which the structure can no longer sustain stability under its self-weight due toextensive seismic damage. The stability index at this point is defined as λ f and the associatedmedian value of the seismic hazard value isµˆλ f. This level is defined as the ‘capacity’ – orcollapse limit state – of the structure. Between these limits, λ uo and λ f , a third limit point isidentified at λ u = 0.95λ uo , corresponding to the point at which the lateral stability begins to2.52.01.5α = 0.45T F = 1.65T 1S a (T 1 ,5%)1.51.0S a R S a α1.00.50.5λ u = 1.0λ u = 0.95λ uo0.00 2 4 6 8 10 12 140.00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14IDR MAXIDR MAX(a)(b)Figure 5 – Stability curves versus IM, (a) IM = S a , (b) IM = S a R saα10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!