04.12.2012 Views

Official Statement Airport Commission City and County of San ...

Official Statement Airport Commission City and County of San ...

Official Statement Airport Commission City and County of San ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Voter Approved Changes to the Retirement Plan. The <strong>City</strong>’s retirement benefits are established under the<br />

Charter <strong>and</strong> approved directly by the voters, rather than through the regular collective bargaining process; most<br />

changes to retirement benefits require a voter-approved Charter amendment. On June 3, 2008, the voters <strong>of</strong> <strong>San</strong><br />

Francisco approved Proposition B, which increases the service required for <strong>City</strong> employees hired after January 10,<br />

2009 to qualify for employer-funded retiree health benefits, establishes a separate Retiree Health Care Trust Fund to<br />

fund retiree health costs, <strong>and</strong> increases retirement benefits <strong>and</strong> retirement cost-<strong>of</strong>-living adjustments for<br />

“miscellaneous” employees. The cost <strong>of</strong> Proposition B is incorporated in the actuarial valuation as <strong>of</strong> July 1, 2008.<br />

The voters <strong>of</strong> <strong>San</strong> Francisco have recently approved two other retirement plan amendments:<br />

• The enactment <strong>of</strong> a Deferred Retirement Option Plan available to certain police members effective<br />

July 1, 2008, authorized by the February 2008 election by initiative proposition; <strong>and</strong><br />

• A limited cost transfer <strong>of</strong> 33 <strong>Airport</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficers’ historical service from CalPERS to SFERS<br />

effective July 1, 2009, authorized by the voters <strong>of</strong> the November 2007 election.<br />

Recent Funding Performance. From Fiscal Year 1996-97 through Fiscal Year 2003-04, the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />

contribution to the Retirement System decreased to zero due to lowered funding requirements as determined by the<br />

consulting actuary <strong>of</strong> the Retirement System <strong>and</strong> adopted by the Retirement Board. The zero percent employer<br />

funding requirements for this period were due primarily to higher-than-projected investment earnings <strong>and</strong> lowerthan-projected<br />

wage increases. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2004-05, the Retirement Board reinstated required<br />

employer contributions based on the funding requirements as determined by the consulting actuary in the manner<br />

described above in “–Funding Practices.” In Fiscal Year 2008-09, total employer contributions to the Retirement<br />

System were $119.75 million which was 4.99% <strong>of</strong> that portion <strong>of</strong> a member’s Pensionable Salary.<br />

The table on the next page summarizes Retirement System actual contributions for Fiscal Years 2004-05<br />

through 2008-09. The column “Market Value <strong>of</strong> Assets” reflects the fair market value <strong>of</strong> assets held in trust for<br />

payment <strong>of</strong> pension benefits; the column “Actuarial Value <strong>of</strong> Assets” refers to the value <strong>of</strong> assets held in trust<br />

adjusted according to the Retirement System’s actuarial methods as summarized above; the column “Pension<br />

Benefit Obligation” reflects the accrued actuarial liability <strong>of</strong> the Retirement System; the column “Percent Funded”<br />

column is determined by dividing the actuarial value <strong>of</strong> assets by the Pension Benefit Obligations; <strong>and</strong> the column<br />

“Employer <strong>and</strong> Employee Contributions” reflects the total <strong>of</strong> m<strong>and</strong>ated employee contributions <strong>and</strong> employer<br />

Actuarial Retirement Contributions received by the Retirement System.<br />

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM<br />

Fiscal Years 2004-05 through 2008-09<br />

($ in thous<strong>and</strong>s)<br />

Actuarial Pension Employee <strong>and</strong> Employer<br />

Fiscal Market Value Value Benefit Percent Employer Contribution<br />

Year <strong>of</strong> Assets <strong>of</strong> Assets Obligation Funded Contribution† Rates<br />

___________<br />

†<br />

2004-05 $13,135,263 $12,659,698 $11,765,737 108.0% $248,029 4.48%<br />

2005-06 14,497,022 13,597,646 12,515,463 109.0 289,226 6.58<br />

2006-07 16,952,044 14,929,287 13,541,388 110.0 308,348 6.24<br />

2007-08 15,832,521 15,941,390 15,358,824 103.8 319,183 5.91<br />

2008-09 11,866,729 16,004,730 16,498,649 97.0 312,715 4.99<br />

† Employer Contribution rates for Fiscal Years 2009-10 <strong>and</strong> 2010-11 are 9.49% <strong>and</strong> 13.56%, respectively.<br />

Sources: Retirement System audited financial statements <strong>and</strong> supplemental schedules June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2005 <strong>and</strong> Retirement<br />

System Actuarial Valuation reports as <strong>of</strong> July 1, 2005, July 1, 2006, July 1, 2007, July 1, 2008 <strong>and</strong> July 1, 2009.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!