13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE EXODUS 407The date of <strong>the</strong> Exodus, like most Eg57ptian dates, hi<strong>the</strong>rtoa matter of considerable contention, is now generally agreedas falling between 1300 and 1200 B.C. Petrie ^ fixes on"1220 B.C. or possibly ra<strong>the</strong>r later," Hanbury Brown places<strong>the</strong> Flight ten years earlier, i.e. 1230, for reasons based mainlyon <strong>the</strong> stele of King Menephtah.2So if <strong>the</strong> contention that <strong>the</strong> Israelites could not well knowof <strong>the</strong> Rod because of its invention after <strong>the</strong>ir flight holdswater, any representation of Rod fishing must obviously besubsequent to <strong>the</strong> year 1230 or 1220 B.C. Only two suchrepresentations exist : (A) (in Wilkinson's Plate 370) comes<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> tomb (No. 93) of Kenamum at Thebes, and dates<strong>from</strong> about <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> XVIIIth Dynasty, or some200 years before <strong>the</strong> Exodus, while (B) (in Wilkinson's Plate 371,and in Newberry's Beni Hasan, vol. I. Plate XXIX.) goes backto <strong>the</strong> early Xllth Dynasty or some 750 years before <strong>the</strong>Exodus. 3The Exodus, whatever date be assigned, probably occurredin <strong>the</strong> time of and was occasioned by a dynasty non-Semitic,and unfavourable to Israel. The corvee enforced doubtlessby <strong>the</strong> kourbash was exacted <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> ahens, whose task(Exodus i, 11) included <strong>the</strong> building of two brick fortresses toblock <strong>the</strong> eastern road into Egypt.1 op. cit., p. 53.- The inscription mentions <strong>the</strong> existing conditions of foreign affairs withneighbouring countries as satisfactory. It is in this connection that <strong>the</strong>" people of Israel " come in. Their Exodus, according to Pharaonic fashion,would have been described by <strong>the</strong> King as an expulsion and not as an escapeagainst his will. The author of <strong>the</strong> inscription, who wrote <strong>from</strong> a point ofview which was not that of <strong>the</strong> Biblical account, seems not unsupported byExodus xii. 39, " Because <strong>the</strong>y were thrust out of Egypt and could not tarry."Even stronger is <strong>the</strong> Revised Version marginal rendering in Exodus xi. i," When he shall let you go altoge<strong>the</strong>r, he shall utterly thrust you out hence."Sir Hanbury Brown, Journal of Egyptian ArchcBology (Jan. 1917), p. 19.^ In connection with, perhaps even helping to fix, <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> Exodus,it is in <strong>the</strong> victorious hymn of Menephtah that <strong>the</strong> <strong>earliest</strong> written referenceto Israel appears ": Israel is desolated : her seed is not. Palestine hasbecome a (defenceless) widow of Egypt " (Breasted), or " The Israelites areswept off: his seed is no more " (Naville). Petrie's translation, " The peopleof Israel is spoiled : it has no corn (or seed)," does not for various reasonsseem to find favour. The majority of Egyptologists now identify Aahmes I.with <strong>the</strong> " new king who knew not Joseph," c. (1582), Rameses II. as <strong>the</strong> firstPharaoh of <strong>the</strong> Oppression, and of Exodus ii. 15 (c. 1300), and Menephtah<strong>the</strong> son of Rameses II. with <strong>the</strong> Pharaoh of <strong>the</strong> Plagues and <strong>the</strong> Flight <strong>from</strong>Egypt (c. 1234).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!