13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:4o6ROD NOT EMPLOYED—REASONSof, or <strong>the</strong> " cultural associations " in, a German work often defyprediction <strong>from</strong> its mere headings. Mainzer, in his Fischfang,serves to recall Person's lines, which are <strong>the</strong>mselves but anadaptation of a Greek epigram, i" The Germans in GreekAre sadly to seek.Not five in five scoreBut ninety-five more.All save only Hermann,"And Hermann's a German !Lest my own conclusion—that nei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> Old or NewTestament is <strong>the</strong> imphed use of <strong>the</strong> Rod estabUshed—carrylittle weight, I subjoin <strong>the</strong> conclusions (stated in letters to me)arrived at by two well-known Hebrew scholars.The first comes <strong>from</strong> Professor A. R. S. Kennedy (<strong>the</strong>writer of <strong>the</strong> article on <strong>Fishing</strong> in <strong>the</strong> EncyclopcBdia Bihlica) :" In short you are entirely justified, so far as evidence goes,in saying that <strong>the</strong> Jews did not use <strong>the</strong> Rod."The second comes <strong>from</strong> Dr. St. Clair Tisdall ": We find in<strong>the</strong> Bible no proof of fishing with Rod and Une :on <strong>the</strong> contrary<strong>the</strong> fact that no mention whatever, direct or indirect, of <strong>the</strong>fishing Rod occurs ei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> Bible or (as far as my readinggoes) in <strong>the</strong> Talmud, makes it almost certain that <strong>the</strong> Rodwas not used by <strong>the</strong> Jews, At any rate <strong>the</strong> use of any suchinstrument is not implied in ei<strong>the</strong>r Book."A second reason for <strong>the</strong> absence of <strong>the</strong> Rod may be thatof dates. The Jews, it might be urged, were not and couldnot be aware of Egyptian Angling, because it sprang upsubsequent to <strong>the</strong>ir Exodus <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. The reply Ioffer involves, it is true, that bewildering factor, Egyptianchronology. But even if a thousand years are as nothing in<strong>the</strong> sight of Manetho and many o<strong>the</strong>rs, surely one epochcorrelates with ano<strong>the</strong>r, and <strong>the</strong> shifting of one date automaticallyinvolves <strong>the</strong> shifting of o<strong>the</strong>rs.1 In a letter to A. Dalziel, Sept. 3, 1803, Person states that <strong>the</strong>se lineswere an effort made to English an epigram by an Etonian friend, in imitationof Phocylides's saw (Strabo, X. p. 487)Kal rSSi co/ci/A.i5oi/. Aepioi kukol, oux S /xiv, hs 5' ov,iravres, ir\r]v VlpoKKfuvs' Kal TlpoKKfr]? Aepios.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!