13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—BY KINGS AND PRIESTS—PIANKHI 321prestige—was identical. Where <strong>the</strong> people abstained, <strong>the</strong>yate ; where <strong>the</strong> people ate, <strong>the</strong>y abstained.The Kings as High Priests seem, down to Ptolemaic <strong>times</strong>,to have eschewed fish absolutely. The Stele of Piankhi, at anyrate, indicates <strong>the</strong>ir practice c. 700 B.C. To this Nubianconqueror of Egypt came <strong>the</strong> petty Kings of <strong>the</strong> Delta to offersubmission ; but " <strong>the</strong>y, whose legs <strong>from</strong> fear were as <strong>the</strong>legs of women, entered not into <strong>the</strong> King's house, because <strong>the</strong>ywere unclean and eaters of fish, which is an abomination for<strong>the</strong> Court : but King Namlot, he entered, because he waspure, and ate not fish." 1The reason for this insistence by a Nubian lay perhaps in<strong>the</strong> fact that Piankhi had as monarch of Egypt just beenaffiliated to <strong>the</strong> Sun-god, who not only created righteousness,but lived and fed upon it. A curious prayer or semi-threatby one of <strong>the</strong> dead survives. If he be not allowed to face hisenemy in <strong>the</strong> great council of <strong>the</strong> gods, <strong>the</strong> Sun-god shouldor would come down <strong>from</strong> Heaven and live on fish in <strong>the</strong> Nile,while Hapi, <strong>the</strong> god of <strong>the</strong> river, should or would ascend toHeaven and feed on righteousness. The granting of hisprayer or <strong>the</strong> fulfilment of his threat would reverse <strong>the</strong> wholescheme of creation. 2The word translated by abomination signifies generallysomething dirty. The epi<strong>the</strong>t, if <strong>the</strong> Deltaic kings resembled<strong>the</strong> Deltaic fishermen, is not inappropriate. Many representationsof <strong>the</strong> XVIIIth and XlXth Dynasties render <strong>the</strong> latter,in contradistinction to <strong>the</strong>ir bro<strong>the</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong> river proper,with scrubby beards, uncouth of aspect and scant of dressa characteristic which Diodorus Siculus notes, when describing<strong>the</strong>ir habitations as mere cabins of reeds.But in fairness it must be remembered that since nearlyall history and representations reach us <strong>from</strong> Upper Egypt,<strong>the</strong>se portraits may merely typify <strong>the</strong> contempt or dislikefelt by <strong>the</strong> richer and more civihsed Nilotic for his Deltaic^J. H. Breasted, Records of Ancient Egypt (Chicago, 1906-7), vol. IV.,par. 882.* See Hastings' Ency. of Religion and Ethics, vol. X. pp. 796 and 482, andZeitschrifl fur agyptischc Sprache, vol. 49, p, 51 (Leipzig, 191 1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!