13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 ARISTOTLE THE FIRST SCALE-READERstriking <strong>the</strong> opposite bank. Two of us lying hidden in <strong>the</strong>grass observed <strong>from</strong> different spots.The gun was fired eight feet, four feet, and three feet above<strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> stream, which varied in breadth <strong>from</strong> eightto ten feet, and in depth <strong>from</strong> sixteen to nineteen inches. Itwas fired into <strong>the</strong> air and into <strong>the</strong> opposite bank (struck <strong>from</strong>four to two feet above <strong>the</strong> water) in a direct line above differentfishes, lying ei<strong>the</strong>r singly or in shoals <strong>from</strong> five to nine inches<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom in small pools or runs sixteen to nineteeninches deep. Care was taken to fire up stream, to prevent <strong>the</strong>trout being startled by <strong>the</strong> flash of <strong>the</strong> cartridge.In no case did <strong>the</strong> trout take <strong>the</strong> very least notice, or giveany sign of having heard <strong>the</strong> explosion or felt <strong>the</strong> concussionof <strong>the</strong> shot on <strong>the</strong> opposite bank, composed on three occasionsof alluvial soil and on two of rock. Never once did a fishmove or go down : in fact, in one of <strong>the</strong> experiments over asingle well-grown trout, <strong>the</strong> fish was rising again to <strong>the</strong> naturalfly in less than thirty seconds after <strong>the</strong> discharge of <strong>the</strong> gun.iAristotle almost certainly learnt dissection when young.His fa<strong>the</strong>r belonged to <strong>the</strong> Asclepiads, an order of priestphysicianswho are believed to have practised dissection andtaught it to <strong>the</strong>ir children. The son's extensive knowledge of<strong>the</strong> internal parts of mammals, birds, and fishes probablyresulted <strong>from</strong> dissections. Mr. Lones names forty-nine animalsand fishes which <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> trustworthiness of <strong>the</strong> definiteinformation imparted were (he holds) certainly dissected. Of<strong>the</strong>se some five are fish.To <strong>the</strong> question whe<strong>the</strong>r Aristotle ever dissected <strong>the</strong> humanbody, <strong>the</strong> answer after examining <strong>the</strong> evidence availablemust, I think, be in <strong>the</strong> negative, for three reasons. Firstafter describing <strong>the</strong> external parts of <strong>the</strong> human body hestates that <strong>the</strong> internal parts are less known than those ofanimals, and that we must, in order to describe <strong>the</strong>m, examine<strong>the</strong> corresponding parts of animals which are most nearlyrelated to man.Second : his many mistakes—such as in <strong>the</strong> position of <strong>the</strong>^ The experiments conducted by Alfred Ronalds and recorded in hisfamous Fly-Fisher's Entomology, London, 1862, had similar results.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!