13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a rough self-made microscope of <strong>the</strong> scales of a large tame carp,he counted <strong>the</strong> component scale-layers lying one above <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,"as if glued toge<strong>the</strong>r," and found without exception thata new layer larger than <strong>the</strong> one of <strong>the</strong> preceding year is added.The carp, accidentally killed when forty years old, possessedforty such layers in each scale. He adds pa<strong>the</strong>tically—anticipatingperhaps Lytton's——SCALE-READING 2000 YEARS OLD 109" A Reformer, a creed by posterity learntA century after its author is burnt "that " many people accused me of telling lies on <strong>the</strong> matter !" 1One cannot help being struck with acute astonishmentthat for over <strong>the</strong> 2000 years between Aristotle and Leeuwenhoekwe obtain, with <strong>the</strong> exception 2 of nine words in Pliny (IX.33), Senectutis indicium squamarum duritia, qucB non suntomnibus similes, cribbed and condensed, as was often his wont,<strong>from</strong> Aristotle, Httle, if any, addition to our knowledge ofscale-reading.The ancient authors ei<strong>the</strong>r ignore or are ignorant of it.Nowhere, not even in that close observer Oppian, that omnivorousreader A<strong>the</strong>naeus, that pleasant purloiner ^Elian, dowe read a single Hne on <strong>the</strong> subject. But our astonishment,even if we allow for absence of microscope, grows acuter, whenwe are met in <strong>the</strong> three most important Ichthyologists before<strong>the</strong> eighteenth century, Belon, Salviani, and Rondolet, with<strong>the</strong> same silence.And this fate of silence apparently prevails even afterLeeuwenhoek's book ; his discovery seems to have been lostor remained dormant in his pages till a score of years ago.Had microscopes existed in his day, we may surely surmisethat Aristotle would have perfected <strong>the</strong> system of scalereading,and thus have come down to posterity with his title1 In Epistolce physiologiccB (Delft, 1719), IV. p. 401, he describes how <strong>the</strong>squamulcs or scalelets of a herring (twelve years old) were found regularlysuperimposed, each year's growth on that of <strong>the</strong> preceding year.2 A<strong>the</strong>naeus, referring, however, solely to <strong>the</strong> Murex, " <strong>the</strong>ir growth isshown by <strong>the</strong> rings on <strong>the</strong>ir scales," is simply quoting <strong>from</strong> Aristotle (asDindorf's text makes plain), whose term of six years he adopts :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!