13.07.2015 Views

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

Fishing from the earliest times - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ROD IN HOMER 77glittering hook of bronze, so on <strong>the</strong> bright spear dragged heThestor," etc.*F. Odyssey, IV. 368 f . :" Who " (<strong>the</strong> companions of Menelaus)" were ever roaming round <strong>the</strong> isle, fishing with bent hooks,for hunger was gnawing at <strong>the</strong>ir belly."Odyssey, XII. 330 f. :" They " (<strong>the</strong> companions of Odysseus)" went wandering with barbed hooks in quest of game, as needs<strong>the</strong>y must, fishes and fowls, whatever might come to <strong>the</strong>irhand, for hunger gnawed at <strong>the</strong>ir belly." ^The Rod finds one express mention—in passage C. Is itsuse implied in passages D. and E. ? The answer depends greatlyon whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> adjectives employed are really descriptive of <strong>the</strong>quahties and sizes of <strong>the</strong> fish,or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are merely (asoften <strong>the</strong> case in Homer) ornamental or conventional epi<strong>the</strong>tsmore suited for general than particular use, or are redundant.Our wonder, if <strong>the</strong> adjectives are really descriptive, growsby <strong>the</strong> Rod being only specifically mentioned when " httlefishes " are <strong>the</strong> prey.If <strong>the</strong> contention of modern fishermen<strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> rod as an implement increases in proportionto <strong>the</strong> weight of <strong>the</strong> fish on <strong>the</strong> hook—holds good, why doesHomer cite <strong>the</strong> Rod in connection only with "little" fishes,more especially as <strong>the</strong> prey in <strong>the</strong> simile (<strong>the</strong> companions ofOdysseus) can hardly be classed as " little " ?^ See Eustathius ad loc. The spear with which Telegonos woundedOdysseus was tipped with <strong>the</strong> Kivrpov of a Roach, according to A. G. Pearson,Fragments of Sophocles (Cambridge, 1917), vol. ii. p. 105 ff., d propos of <strong>the</strong> lost'OSuo-o-eus aKaveoir\i]^. Van 'Le.eviwen {Odyssey, 2nd ed., Leyden, 1917), in hisnote on xi. 134-7, makes <strong>the</strong> fish <strong>the</strong> sting-ray {radio raics pastinacce), which<strong>from</strong> its deadly character (cf. Pliny, N. H., ix. 67) is to my mind much moreprobable, despite Liddell and Scott's translation of rpvycov as ' roach,' <strong>the</strong>absolutely harmless Roach ! Cf. Epicharmus, Frag. 66 Kaibel, Tpvy6i'est' oTTia-eSKfi'Tpoi, and Aristotle, N. H., ix. 48. Whatever <strong>the</strong> fish were, it is good toknow that it too came to an untimely death at <strong>the</strong> hands of Phorcys, becauseof its cannibal propensities. See Eustathius, O^., p. 1676, 45, commenting onxi. 133. In The Life of Apollonius of Tyana, vi. 32, Philostratos says Odysseuswas wounded by <strong>the</strong> alxf^v Trjs Tpvy6vos. Van Leeuwen instances among someold armour preserved at Bergum <strong>the</strong> weapon of an Indian pirate, " which ismade of <strong>the</strong> tail of <strong>the</strong> ray."^ It is with something of a shock I find such careful translators as Butcherand Lang translating yvafiirrolcnv ayKicrrpoKni' in Od., IV. 369, as " bent,"and in Od., XII. 332, as " barbed" hooks, without one word of explanation.These weapons differ in appearance, execution, and date of invention. Toevolve <strong>the</strong> barbed <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> bent hook required probably as many generationsof men, and centuries of effort, as <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> bent hook <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>primitive gorge. See Introduction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!