13.07.2015 Views

plastische, reconstructieve en esthetische chirurgie - UZ Leuven

plastische, reconstructieve en esthetische chirurgie - UZ Leuven

plastische, reconstructieve en esthetische chirurgie - UZ Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

„functional extremity“ can be reconstructed at the upperarm level in 22 to 34%, proximal forearm level 30 to 41%and distal forearm level 56 to 80%. All pati<strong>en</strong>ts neededat least 2 secondary operative procedures. 5 of 65pati<strong>en</strong>ts were reamputated because of postoperativecomplications. As the functional results after replantationare at least equal (proximal level) or ev<strong>en</strong> far superior(distal level), some protective s<strong>en</strong>sibility at the hand canbe expected ev<strong>en</strong> at the most proximal levels, and themissing psychological impairm<strong>en</strong>t caused by missingbody integrity, reconstruction should be carried out ifpossible, reasonable with regard to the expectedfunction, estimated of low risk for the pati<strong>en</strong>t anddesired. The higher cost and amount of operationsneeded, as well as the longer postoperative care andlonger time of disability after replantation are justified bya significant increase in life quality.HIERNER R., BETZ A., POHLEMANN T., BERGER A.: Longtermresults after lower leg replantation – does the resultjustify the risks and efforts? Eur. J. Trauma, 2005; 4: 389-398.Although subtotal and total lower leg amputation havebe<strong>en</strong> successfully replanted in the past, nowadays thereis a common opinion that "these replantations do notjustify their efforts, and therefore the pati<strong>en</strong>ts shouldundergo primary amputation". In order to clarify thishypothesis we carried out a retrospective clinical study ofour personal cases operated on betwe<strong>en</strong> 1981 – 1998and an ext<strong>en</strong>sive literature research. The followingcriteria were evaluated 1) survival rate, 2) individualmotor and s<strong>en</strong>sory functions and global lower extremityfunction judged according to the classification of CHEN,3) socioeconomic aspects (operation time, number ofoperations per pati<strong>en</strong>t, time of hospitalization, return tonormal life), 4) number and nature of local and/orsystemic complications and 5) subjective judgm<strong>en</strong>t bythe pati<strong>en</strong>t.All replanted lower legs in our series survived. UsingCHEN`s classification the functional results can be giv<strong>en</strong>as follows: Stage I 64,2%, Stage II 28,5% (thus a"functional extremity" could be reconstructed in 92,7%),stage III 7,1% and stage IV 0%. Social reintegration wasachieved within 8 to 10 months after replantation. 4 to 7secondary operations were carried out in every pati<strong>en</strong>t inorder to improve the result. Total duration of therapy took28 to 48 months. There were no secondary reamputation.Using our personal algorithm, on the one hand there is asignificant decrease in replantation frequ<strong>en</strong>cy (30% of alltransferred cases in our replantation c<strong>en</strong>tre). However,on the other hand those cases replanted show betterfunctional and aesthetic results and a significant lowerreplantation risk. Our results as well as those of otherlarge series show that lower leg replantation is stillworthwhile in a well selected pati<strong>en</strong>t group, contrary towhat is believed by an increasing number of orthopaedic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!