Wavefront Coding

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Increased depth of field:The good and the uglyConventional imageHybrid imaging: cubicphase profileCarles et al, J. Mod. Opt. in press (2010)8
Effect of defocus when usingsymmetric and antisymmetric masksWithoutphase maskCircularly symmetricModerate Extreme MinordefocusAntisymmetric⎡OH o'(x, y) = I −1 W20 opt⎢⎣⎢H W20( ) H dl( res)⎤⎥⎦⎥Withphase mask9
Page 1 and 2: Computational Imaging:More pixels,
Page 3 and 4: Why computational imaging?• Imagi
Page 5 and 6: Hybrid imaging5
Page 7: The additional parameter space with
Page 11 and 12: Optimisation of artefact-free imagi
Page 13 and 14: Through-focus imaging fidelity13
Page 15 and 16: Expected imaging error• errorε 2
Page 17 and 18: Relative performance of cubic, pure
Page 19 and 20: Optimum phase amplitudeα optimum
Page 21 and 22: Artefacts⎡OH o'(x, y) = I −1 W2
Page 23 and 24: Decomposition of OTF• Defocus:•
Page 25 and 26: The origin of image replicationsOTF
Page 27 and 28: Parametric blind-deconvolution:Calc
Page 29 and 30: Accuracy of optical W 20DError in W
Page 31 and 32: Simplification of LWIR F/1 f=75mm G
Page 33 and 34: Pure and Generalised Cubic Solution
Page 35 and 36: IR singlet and phase maskDesignManu
Page 37 and 38: And as a movie37
Page 39 and 40: Single-moving-element zoom lenses:t
Page 41 and 42: No Phase maskGeneralised CubicPure

Wavefront Coding

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?