30 <strong>ART</strong> <strong>PAPERS</strong>and environment. Harvey wrote that the “‘environment’ is whateversurrounds or, to be more precise, whatever exists in the surroundingsof some being that is relevant to the state of that beingat a particular moment.” 13 We customarily assign that “being” ananthropocentric identity, but more generally, “being” refers to anontological study of surroundings. The processes of place andspace, of course, also surround that being. Thus, even as place andspace describe processes of formation, environment describes howthose formations surround and condition the existence of somebeing within. Neshat deploys environment in her works in preciselythis way, as at the center of her portrayals of place and spacethere exists—whether human or otherwise—a living being.Environment as a being surrounded by both place and spacefinds clear expression in Tooba, a two-channel video installationfrom 2002. The work takes its name from the Tooba tree, a treebelieved to grow expansively in heaven in the Muslim traditionand, as Neshat points out, one of the few feminine symbols to figurein the Koran. 14 In a square gallery, two screens oppose eachother. The screens do not alternate, as in Turbulent, but rather showconcurrent narratives. On one screen, a woman with her eyesclosed—her body recessed in the crook of a tree’s trunk—breathesgently. A square brick wall sequesters the tree, demarcating placeand boundary. Surrounding the brick wall is a desolate landscapeundulating outward toward the horizon. Unlike the green tree, thislandscape is barren, dotted with dry grasses and cleared crops.In the opposing sequence, a group of men sits in a circle, chantingagainst a black background. Their tightly packed adjacent bodiescircumscribe the area within and thus define it as a discreteplace, recalling the strict geometry of the tree’s brick enclosure. Thesequence alternates between this ritualistic circle and shots of itsenvironment. In those environmental shots, the men first appear inthe landscape’s distance, but the camera closes in on them as theymarch toward the tree. As the cinematic sequence unfolds, the mencharge and eventually scale the tree’s surrounding walls. Althoughthey surround Tooba, they do not touch it. Tooba lies in a state ofexile: the tree-and-woman <strong>com</strong>plex is trapped in place by the circleof men and the perimeter of the wall. These markers of place, inturn, are surrounded by the endless space of the landscape.Having passed through five rooms of video installations and tworooms of photography, the viewer is eventually guided into thelargest room in the retrospective. In that room are the final videoinstallations of the exhibit, which here employ five screens; two ofthose screens play the looped videos Munis and Zarin. (Theseinstalled, nonlinear versions of Munis (2008) and Zarin (2005) predatethe feature film version; these separate installations aretogether titled Women Without Men, just as the film is.) A final wallshows the triptych video installation Mahdokht (2004) (positionedmuch like an opened altarpiece). Although not represented inNeshat’s feature film version, Mahdokht serves as the fifth protagonistin Parsipur’s story.Seated within an orchard, Mahdokht exists in the liminal tanglebetween place and space (and even life and death). Retrospectivecurator Rebecca R. Hart reports that Mahdokht “suffers from a phobiaabout sexual intimacy, although she longs to care for and clothehundreds of children.” 15 Mahdokht maniacally knits an immeasur-
able length of yellow yarn that carpets the arboreal environment inwhich she sits. Hart notes that, “as her obsession progresses, sheknits more frantically as her fingers multiply.” 16 Mahdokht is visiblyirrational and deeply disturbed by her phobic obsession; she sitsat the unstable juncture between place and space. This unstableenvironment is at the center of the place-space dialectic: Mahdokhtremains entangled in a struggle to “plant” herself, though she islost within an unending grove.It is at this point that an overwhelmed or disoriented gallery visitormight reflect on his or her own transitional state. Havingwalked through eight galleries and as many corridors, having seenhours of video, and having been kept in a state of oscillationbetween fiction and reality, viewers are now carefully triangulatedwithin the place of this final gallery. And yet, they are still caughtin the flowing space and time of the convoluted exhibit. This environmentinitiates in the viewer the ontological crisis thatMahdokht enacts on the screen.Environment, more than the intersection of the processes ofplace and space, is itself the heart of existing between thoseprocesses. The DIA curator and exhibition designers clearly anticipatedthis environmental crisis: not only is the exhibition floorplanitself a labyrinth of enclosed places and open spaces, but iteven builds a “reflection area” in a central chamber, as if to encouragethe viewer to examine the surroundings of his or her ownbeing. Neshat’s work here—as in many works throughout heroeuvre—recasts exile not as an effect of evacuated place or conqueredspace, but as an environmental problem. As Harvey suggests,place, space, and time are three contributing, ever-changingelements that surround and define a state of being. In her multivalentrepresentations of place and space, environment and exile,Neshat asks us to consider the existential meaning of our ownintersection within these <strong>com</strong>plex geographies.John J. Corso is an art critic based in metro Detroit. He is an assistantprofessor of contemporary art history and critical theory at OaklandUniversity in Rochester, Michigan.NOTES1. Shirin Neshat, artist lecture (Detroit Institute of Arts, March 27, 2013, part ofthe lecture series Global Imaginaries/Individual Realities).2. Joy Dietrich and Shirin Neshat, “Asked and Answered: Shirin Neshat,” NewYork Times Style Magazine, May 14, 2010, accessed May 1, 2013,http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.<strong>com</strong>/2010/05/14/asked-and-answeredshirin-neshat3. David Harvey, Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Cambridge,MA: Blackwell, 1996), 7.4. Ibid, 263. Emphasis original.5. See Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1991).6. Harvey, 263.7. Ibid, 262.8. Ibid, 262.9. Ibid, 261.10. Arthur C. Danto and Marina Abramovic, Shirin Neshat (New York: Rizzoli,2010), 45.11. Lefebvre, Production, quoted in Harvey, 273.12. Klaus Ronneberger, “Henri Lefebvre and Urban Everyday Life,” in Space,Difference, Everyday Life, ed. Kanishka Goonewardena et al., (New York:Routledge, 2008), 135. Essential here is Lefebvre’s Critique of Everyday Life(New York: Verso, 1991).13. David Harvey, “The Nature of Environment: Dialectics of Social andEnvironmental Change,” Socialist Register 29 (1993), 2.14. Shirin Neshat, artist lecture (Detroit Institute of Arts, March 27, 2013, part ofthe lecture series Global Imaginaries/Individual Realities).15. Rebecca R. Hart et al., Shirin Neshat, exh. cat. (Detroit, MI: Detroit Institute ofArts, 2013), 120.16. Ibid, 120.Thanks to Rebecca R. Hart and John Cummins Steele for early access to theexhibition. Thanks also to Erin Dziedzic, J. Erin Sweeney, and Sherry WynnPerdue for their editorial assistance.OPPOSITE: Shirin Neshat in her studio, 2012 / ABOVE: Shirin Neshat, Tooba, 2002, two-channel video/audio installation, 12:42 minutes [© Shirin Neshat; courtesy of the artistand Gladstone Gallery, New York and Brussels]<strong>ART</strong><strong>PAPERS</strong>.ORG 31
- Page 1 and 2: ART PAPERSON SPACEMAY/JUNE 2013 US
- Page 3 and 4: tenfifty-eightforty-nine
- Page 5 and 6: On SpaceMay/June 2013The ComplexGeo
- Page 7 and 8: Hunter Museum of American Art10 Blu
- Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE DIRECTORSaskia BenjaminGU
- Page 13 and 14: organization Artangel, 6 and from t
- Page 15 and 16: a discussion on“regionalism”The
- Page 17: SJDIBDMThese days, defining what co
- Page 20 and 21: I.B. T A U R I SP U B L I S H E R S
- Page 24 and 25: 22 ART PAPERSXaviera Simmons, Untit
- Page 26 and 27: 24 ART PAPERSXaviera Simmons, Denve
- Page 28: The Complex Geographiesof Shirin Ne
- Page 31: sequent galleries of the exhibition
- Page 36 and 37: ucts” because they are “highly
- Page 38 and 39: ongoing). The series comprises arch
- Page 40 and 41: Artist ProjectAdam CvijanovicAdam C
- Page 42 and 43: 40 ART PAPERSAdam Cvijanovic, River
- Page 45 and 46: Because the Night:Curating One-Off
- Page 47 and 48: hit, perhaps because the artist’s
- Page 49 and 50: or Marina Abramovic did are things
- Page 51 and 52: The Italian American artist Marino
- Page 55 and 56: OH, CANADAat MASS MoCA, NORTH ADAMS
- Page 57 and 58: etween overwrought re-presentations
- Page 59 and 60: JESSICA RANKINATLANTANeedlework and
- Page 61 and 62: DETOUCHEDDUBLINDetouched isn’t re
- Page 63 and 64: RYAN TRAVIS CHRISTIANRALEIGH, NCRya
- Page 65 and 66: peeling up the layers, and re-placi
- Page 67 and 68: June11-16201366 Galleries from 22 C