CCRS Grant Review Orientation Slides - Grantreviewinfo.net

Recommendations

Info

Panel Discussion Process• Calls are estimated to last 3 hours• Recommended timeframe for each application:• Five (5) minutes for introduction of the proposal• Twenty‐five (25) minutes of discussion• Five (5) minutes reporting back and recording scores34
Panel Chairs:Panel Discussion Process• Provide an overview of the responsibilities and structure of thepanel discussion• Lead the discussion for the application under review• Ensure the discussion addresses sub criteria• Identify discrepancies among <strong>Review</strong>ers’ scores and commentsand guide the panel’s discussion toward consensus• To return individual evaluations to reviewers for updating scores,click “Return Evaluation” in ARM35
Page 2: Presenters• OPRE Priority Area Ma
Page 7 and 8: Individual Roles and Responsibiliti
Page 9 and 10: Reviewer’s Responsibilities• Re
Page 11 and 12: PAM Responsibilities• Possess rel
Page 13 and 14: Overview of the Grant Process13
Page 15 and 16: Tips, Tricks, and Checklistsfor eac
Page 17 and 18: Reviewers:Scoring: Evaluation Crite
Page 19 and 20: Reviewers:Helpful Hints for Scoring
Page 21 and 22: Reviewers:Writing Evaluative Commen
Page 23 and 24: Reviewers:Evaluating Your Comments
Page 25 and 26: Reviewers:Sample Evaluative Comment
Page 27 and 28: Reviewers:Commonalities Across Unac
Page 29: Reviewers:Prioritizing Comments in
Page 32 and 33: Reviewers:Panel Discussion Preparat
Page 36 and 37: Reviewers:Panel Discussion Process
Page 38 and 39: Panel Chairs:Finalizing Scoring and
Page 40 and 41: Reviewers:Finalize Scoring and Comm
Page 42 and 43: Panel Chairs:Grant Review Close‐O
Page 44 and 45: All Panel Members:Returning Grant R
Page 46 and 47: Reviewers’ Timeline46
Page 48 and 49: ARMDemonstration48
Page 50: THANK YOU SO MUCH• For giving you

CCRS Grant Review Orientation Slides - Grantreviewinfo.net

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?