13.07.2015 Views

MARSHAL LOUIS N. DAVOUT AND THE ART OF COMMAND A ...

MARSHAL LOUIS N. DAVOUT AND THE ART OF COMMAND A ...

MARSHAL LOUIS N. DAVOUT AND THE ART OF COMMAND A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

division if they controlled this area. It was bounded on one side by the swollen Danube River and on the other by precipitous cliffs. Also Charles1 forces were much closer to the defile than Davout at Ratisbon. Davout's thinking now shifted from the operational . .and strategic mode to the tactical. First, he conducted a thorough reconnaissance that proved very beneficial. He then identified the problem areas and arranged his forces to control them. His initiative and foresight at this point in the campaign were exceptional. He immediately sent a battalion forward to secure and control the defile. This was something Charles should have done the day before. This road was important because it was the only one that would hold I11 Corps artillery and baggage trains. Had the Austrians secured the defile they could have easily prevented Davout from moving south and overwhelmed his forcesat Ratisbon as planned. Again it was Davout's tactical savvy that prevented this from occurring. Davout left Colonel Coutard and his brigade of 2,000 men at Ratisbon to secure the bridge and prevent the Austrians from crossing. Davout's decision to leave a mere 2,000 men to cover such a key area must be questioned. As stated earlier the bridge at Ratisbon was the most logical crossing point for the two Austrian Corps to the north. Therefore controlling this point was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!