Saltonstall to attack certainly did not believe that <strong>the</strong> circumstances were so dire that no attack was feasible. Saltonstall's ships would have suffered, but<strong>the</strong>y would have won. <strong>The</strong> three British sloops would have been captured or sunk, and <strong>the</strong>n what?That question has never been answered, and it was not in <strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts to answer it. George Buker's book is subtitled CommodoreSaltonstall and <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Conspiracy <strong>of</strong> 1779, and its main argument is that <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts conspired to place all <strong>the</strong>blame on Saltonstall, and in that ambition <strong>the</strong>y were brilliantly successful. <strong>The</strong> expedition was a Massachusetts initiative, undertaken without consultationwith <strong>the</strong> Continental Congress, and almost wholly funded by <strong>the</strong> state. Massachusetts insured all <strong>the</strong> private ships; paid <strong>the</strong> crews; supplied <strong>the</strong> militia;provided weapons, ammunition, and stores; and lost every penny. British money was still in use in Massachusetts in 1779 and <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial inquiry was toldthat <strong>the</strong> loss amounted to PS1,588,668 (and ten pence!) and <strong>the</strong> real figure was probably much closer to two million pounds. Discovering <strong>the</strong> equivalency<strong>of</strong> historic monetary sums to present values is a difficult and uncertain task, but at a most conservative estimate that loss, in 2010 U.S. dollars, amounts toaround $300 million. This enormous sum effectively bankrupted <strong>the</strong> state. However, Massachusetts was lucky. <strong>The</strong> <strong>War</strong>ren had been in Boston Harborwhen <strong>the</strong> news <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British incursion arrived, and it had made sense to use that powerful warship, and <strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>r Continental Navy vessels at Boston,and so permission to deploy <strong>the</strong>m had been sought and received from <strong>the</strong> Continental Navy Board. This meant that a small portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defeated forceshad been federal and if <strong>the</strong> blame could be placed on that federal component <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r states might be made to recompense Massachusetts for <strong>the</strong>loss. That required, in turn, for Saltonstall to be depicted as <strong>the</strong> villain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> piece. Massachusetts argued that it had been Saltonstall's behavior whichhad betrayed <strong>the</strong> whole expedition and, supported by mendacious evidence (especially from Solomon Lovell), that argument prevailed. It took manyyears, but in 1793 <strong>the</strong> federal government <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>of</strong> America largely reimbursed Massachusetts for <strong>the</strong> financial loss. So placing <strong>the</strong> entireblame on Saltonstall was politically motivated and very successful as <strong>the</strong> American taxpayer ended up paying for <strong>the</strong> mistakes <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts.So why did Saltonstall not attack? He left no account, and if his court-martial ever took place <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> records have been lost and so we do not possesshis testimony. It was certainly not cowardice that stayed his hand because he proved his courage elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> war, and <strong>the</strong> suggestion that he was inBritish pay is unsupportable. My own belief is that Saltonstall was unwilling to sacrifice his men and, quite possibly, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few frigates left to <strong>the</strong>Continental Navy in an operation which, though successful, would not have advanced <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition. Yes, he could have taken <strong>the</strong> three sloops,but would Lovell have matched his achievement on land? I suspect Saltonstall believed that <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Militia was inadequate, for which belief hehad much evidence, and that destroying <strong>the</strong> sloops was irrelevant to <strong>the</strong> expedition's purpose, which was <strong>the</strong> capture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> George. If <strong>the</strong> sloops weretaken or sunk, <strong>the</strong> fort would have survived, albeit in a less advantageous situation, whereas <strong>the</strong> capture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fort irrevocably doomed <strong>the</strong> sloops.Saltonstall understood that. This is not to exonerate <strong>the</strong> commodore. He was a difficult, prickly man and he was obdurate in his relations with Lovell, andhe failed miserably to stop or even attempt to slow <strong>the</strong> British pursuit during <strong>the</strong> retreat upriver, but he was not <strong>the</strong> man who ruined <strong>the</strong> expedition. Lovellwas.Solomon Lovell has been forgiven for <strong>the</strong> expedition's failure, yet it was Lovell who did not press <strong>the</strong> attacks on <strong>Fort</strong> George which, on <strong>the</strong> day histroops landed, was scarcely defensible. It does seem true that McLean was fully prepared to surrender ra<strong>the</strong>r than provoke a ghastly hand-to-hand fightover his inadequate ramparts (at that moment McLean still believed, probably based on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> rebel transport ships, that he was outnumbered byat least four to one). But Lovell held back. And went on holding back. He refused Peleg Wadsworth's eminently sensible suggestion that <strong>the</strong> rebels shouldprepare a fortification upriver to which <strong>the</strong>y could withdraw if <strong>the</strong> British should send reinforcements. He made no attempt, ever, to storm <strong>the</strong> fort, butinstead called endless councils <strong>of</strong> war (which made decisions by votes) and insisted, in increasingly petulant tones, that Saltonstall attack <strong>the</strong> sloopsbefore <strong>the</strong> militia moved against <strong>the</strong> fort. It is evident that <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Militia were poor soldiers, yet that too was Lovell's responsibility. <strong>The</strong>yneeded discipline, encouragement, and leadership. <strong>The</strong>y received none <strong>of</strong> those things and so <strong>the</strong>y camped forlornly on <strong>the</strong> heights until <strong>the</strong> order cameto retreat. It is true that once <strong>Fort</strong> George's walls were raised sufficiently high Lovell's chances <strong>of</strong> capturing <strong>the</strong> work were almost nonexistent because hedid not have enough men and his artillery had failed to blast a way through <strong>the</strong> ramparts, but certainly he had every hope <strong>of</strong> a successful storm in <strong>the</strong> firstweek <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> siege. My belief is that Dudley Saltonstall understood perfectly well that his destruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sloops would not lead to <strong>the</strong> fort's capture, andthat <strong>the</strong>refore any attack on <strong>the</strong> British ships would simply result in unneccessary naval casualties. He was finally persuaded to enter <strong>the</strong> harbor on Friday,August 13th, but abandoned that attack because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> Sir George Collier's relief fleet. <strong>The</strong> aborted land-sea attack might well have eliminatedMowat's sloops, but Lovell's forces would surely have been decimated by <strong>the</strong> fort's defenders. It was all too little too late, a fiasco caused by atrociousleadership and lack <strong>of</strong> decision.<strong>The</strong> British, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, were very well led by two pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who trusted each o<strong>the</strong>r and cooperated closely. McLean's tactics, which weresimply to go on streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>Fort</strong> George while constantly irritating his besiegers with Caffrae's Light Company, worked perfectly. Mowat donated gunsand men whenever needed. <strong>The</strong> British, after all, only had to survive until reinforcements arrived, and <strong>the</strong>y were fortunate that Sir George Collier (whoreally did write <strong>the</strong> musical presented at <strong>the</strong> Drury Lane <strong>The</strong>atre) beat Henry Jackson's regiment <strong>of</strong> Continental Army regulars to <strong>the</strong> Penobscot River.Brigadier-General Francis McLean was a very good soldier and, even by <strong>the</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> his enemies, a very good man, and he served his king well atMajabigwaduce. Once <strong>the</strong> whole affair was over McLean went out <strong>of</strong> his way to ensure that <strong>the</strong> wounded rebels, stranded far up <strong>the</strong> river, were suppliedwith medical necessities and had a ship to convey <strong>the</strong>m back to Boston. <strong>The</strong>re are rebel accounts <strong>of</strong> encounters with McLean and in all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m he isdepicted as a humane, generous, and decent man. <strong>The</strong> two regiments he led at Majabigwaduce were every bit as inexperienced as <strong>the</strong> militia <strong>the</strong>y faced,yet his young Scotsmen received leadership, inspiration, and example. Peleg Wadsworth did not meet Francis McLean during <strong>the</strong> siege, so <strong>the</strong>irconversation is entirely fictional, though <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> it, Lieutenant Dennis's injury and capture, was real enough. It was Captain Thomas Thomas, master<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> privateer Vengeance, and Lovell's secretary, John Marston, who approached <strong>the</strong> fort under a flag <strong>of</strong> truce to discover Dennis's sad fate, but Iwanted McLean and Wadsworth to meet and so changed <strong>the</strong> facts.I changed as little as I could. So far as I know, Peleg Wadsworth was not asked to investigate <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> peculation against Revere, an accusationthat faded away into <strong>the</strong> larger mess <strong>of</strong> Penobscot. I telescoped some events <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> siege. Brigadier McLean spent a couple <strong>of</strong> days exploringPenobscot Bay before deciding on Majabigwaduce as <strong>the</strong> site for his fort, a reconnaissance I ignored. <strong>The</strong>re were two attempts to lure <strong>the</strong> British intoambushes at <strong>the</strong> Half Moon Battery, both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m disastrous, but for fictional purposes one seemed sufficient, and I have no evidence that John Moorewas involved in ei<strong>the</strong>r action. <strong>The</strong> final immolation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rebel fleet stretched over three days, which I shrank to two.<strong>The</strong> total casualties incurred at Penobscot are very hard to establish. Lovell, in his journal, reckoned <strong>the</strong> rebels lost only fourteen dead and twentywounded in <strong>the</strong>ir assault on <strong>the</strong> bluff, while Peleg Wadsworth, in his written recollection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same action, estimated <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> rebel killed andwounded at a hundred. <strong>The</strong> militia returns are not helpful. Lovell's men were reinforced by some local volunteers (though Lovell noted a general reluctanceamong <strong>the</strong> militia <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Penobscot valley to take up arms against <strong>the</strong> British) so that, on <strong>the</strong> eve <strong>of</strong> Sir George Collier's arrival, <strong>the</strong> rebel army numbered923 men fit for duty as against 873 three weeks before, and this despite combat losses and <strong>the</strong> regrettably high rate <strong>of</strong> desertion. <strong>The</strong> best evidencesuggests that total British losses were twenty-five killed, between thirty and forty seriously wounded, and twenty-six men taken prisoner. Rebel casualtiesare much harder to estimate, but one contemporary source claims fewer than 150 killed and wounded, though ano<strong>the</strong>r, adding in <strong>the</strong> men who did notsurvive <strong>the</strong> long journey home through thickly forested country, goes as high as 474 total casualties. My own conclusion is that rebel casualties were aboutdouble <strong>the</strong> British figures. That might be a low estimate, but certainly <strong>the</strong> Penobscot Expedition, though a disaster for <strong>the</strong> rebels, was blessedly not abloodbath.Lieutenant George Little's angry confrontation with Saltonstall at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition is attested by contemporary evidence, as is PelegWadsworth's encounter with Paul Revere during <strong>the</strong> retreat upriver. Revere, asked to rescue <strong>the</strong> schooner's crew, refused on <strong>the</strong> personal grounds that hedid not wish to risk his baggage being captured by <strong>the</strong> British and on <strong>the</strong> more general grounds that, <strong>the</strong> siege being over, he was no longer obliged toobey <strong>the</strong> orders <strong>of</strong> his superior <strong>of</strong>ficers. Some sources claim that he landed <strong>the</strong> baggage, <strong>the</strong>n sent <strong>the</strong> barge back for <strong>the</strong> schooner's crew. That may wellbe true, and <strong>the</strong> crew was rescued even though <strong>the</strong> schooner itself probably became a third British prize, but afterwards Revere simply left <strong>the</strong> riverwithout orders and, abandoning most <strong>of</strong> his men, made his way back to Boston. Once home he was suspended from his command <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ArtilleryRegiment, placed under house arrest, and, eventually, court-martialed. Peleg Wadsworth had threatened Revere with arrest, and it was Revere's truculentinsolence on <strong>the</strong> day that Wadsworth ordered him to rescue <strong>the</strong> schooner's crew that was to cause Revere <strong>the</strong> most trouble, but o<strong>the</strong>r major charges wereleveled by Brigade Major William Todd and by Marine Captain Thomas Carnes. Those accusations were investigated by <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> Inquiryestablished by <strong>the</strong> General Court <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, which was convened to discover <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong> expedition's failure.Todd and Revere, as <strong>the</strong> novel suggests, had a long history <strong>of</strong> animosity which certainly colored Todd's accusations. Brigade Major Todd claimed thatRevere was frequently absent from <strong>the</strong> American lines, a charge that is supported by o<strong>the</strong>r witnesses and by Lovell's General Order <strong>of</strong> July 30th, 1779(quoted at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> Chapter Nine), and he cited various times when Revere had disobeyed orders, specifically during <strong>the</strong> retreat. Thomas Carnesechoed some <strong>of</strong> those complaints. I know <strong>of</strong> no reason why Carnes, unlike Todd, should have harbored a personal dislike <strong>of</strong> Revere, though perhaps it issignificant that Carnes had been an <strong>of</strong>ficer in Gridley's Artillery and Richard Gridley, <strong>the</strong> regiment's founder and commanding <strong>of</strong>ficer, had fallen out withRevere over Masonic business. Carnes complained that when <strong>the</strong> Americans landed Revere was supposed to be leading his artillerymen as a reservecorps <strong>of</strong> infantry, but instead went back to <strong>the</strong> Samuel for breakfast. Carnes's basic charges, though, concerned Revere's fitness as a gunner, a subjecton which Carnes was expertly equipped to comment. Revere, Carnes said, was not present to supervise <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> batteries and gave his
on which Carnes was expertly equipped to comment. Revere, Carnes said, was not present to supervise <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> batteries and gave hisgunners no instruction or proper supervision. In cross-examination Carnes, an experienced artilleryman, claimed it was extraordinary that Revere "shouldmake such a bad shot and know no more about artillery." It was Carnes's written deposition that accused Revere <strong>of</strong> behavior "which tends to cowardice."Wadsworth testified that Revere was frequently absent from <strong>the</strong> rebel lines and described Revere's refusal to obey orders during <strong>the</strong> eventual retreat.Wadsworth also noted that Revere, when <strong>of</strong>fered a chance to vote on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not to continue <strong>the</strong> siege, consistently chose against continuance. That isnot evidence <strong>of</strong> cowardice, but <strong>the</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> those councils do reveal that Revere was by far <strong>the</strong> most vehement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men urging abandonment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>siege.<strong>The</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Inquiry published its findings in October 1779. It concluded that Commodore Saltonstall bore <strong>the</strong> entire blame for <strong>the</strong> expedition's failureand specifically exonerated Generals Lovell and Wadsworth, yet, despite all <strong>the</strong> evidence, it gave no judgment on Paul Revere's behavior. George Bukerconvincingly argues that <strong>the</strong> committee did not want to dilute its absurd charge that <strong>the</strong> Continental Navy, in <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> Dudley Saltonstall, was solelyresponsible for <strong>the</strong> disaster.Revere was dissatisfied. He had not been condemned, but nei<strong>the</strong>r had his name been cleared and Boston was rife with rumors <strong>of</strong> his "unsoldierlike"behavior. He demanded to be court-martialed. Revere, it seems to me, was a difficult man. One <strong>of</strong> his most sympa<strong>the</strong>tic biographers admits that it wasRevere's "personality traits" that weakened his chances <strong>of</strong> gaining a Continental Army commission. He was quarrelsome, exceedingly touchy about hisown reputation, and prone to pick fights with anyone who criticized him. He had a separate spat with John Hancock, who, inspecting Castle Island duringRevere's absence at Penobscot, dared to find fault with its defenses. <strong>The</strong> General Court, however, did not grant him a court-martial, but insteadreconvened <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> Enquiry, which was now charged with investigating Revere's behavior, and a crucial piece <strong>of</strong> evidence was <strong>the</strong> "diary"Revere had ostensibly kept at Majabigwaduce and which, unsurprisingly, shows him to be a model <strong>of</strong> military diligence. I have no pro<strong>of</strong> that this "diary"was manufactured for <strong>the</strong> inquiry, but it seems very likely. Revere also produced many witnesses to counter <strong>the</strong> charges against him, and his vigorousdefense was largely successful because, when <strong>the</strong> committee reported in November 1779, it cleared Revere <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> cowardice, though it didmildly condemn him for leaving Penobscot without orders and for "disputing <strong>the</strong> orders <strong>of</strong> Brigadier-General Wadsworth respecting <strong>the</strong> Boat." Revere'sonly defense against <strong>the</strong> latter charge was that he had misunderstood Wadsworth's orders.Yet, though he had been cleared <strong>of</strong> cowardice, Revere was still dissatisfied and once again he petitioned for a court-martial. That court finally convenedin 1782 and Revere at last received what he wanted, exoneration. <strong>The</strong> suspicion is that people were tired <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole affair and that, in February 1782,four months after <strong>the</strong> great rebel triumph at Yorktown, no one wanted to resurrect unhappy memories <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Penobscot Expedition and so, though <strong>the</strong>court-martial weakly chided Revere for his refusal to rescue <strong>the</strong> schooner's crew, <strong>the</strong>y acquitted him "with equal Honor as <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Officers" which, in <strong>the</strong>circumstances, was very faint praise indeed. <strong>The</strong> controversy over Revere's behavior at Majabigwaduce persisted with a bitter exchange <strong>of</strong> letters in <strong>the</strong>Boston press, but it was long forgotten by 1861 when Revere was abruptly elevated to <strong>the</strong> heroic status he enjoys today. O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong>fenses such as Revere'sdelay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fleet's departure, his petty refusal to allow anyone else to use <strong>the</strong> Castle Island barge and his failure to withdraw <strong>the</strong> guns from Cross Islandare all attested by various sources.Dudley Saltonstall was dismissed from <strong>the</strong> navy but was able to invest in a privateer, <strong>the</strong> Minerva, with which, in 1781, he captured one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> richestprizes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>Revolutionary</strong> <strong>War</strong>. After <strong>the</strong> war Saltonstall owned trading ships, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m used for slaving, and he died, aged fifty-eight, in 1796.Paul Revere was also successful after <strong>the</strong> war, opening a foundry and becoming a prominent Boston industrialist. He died in 1818, aged eighty-three.Solomon Lovell's political career was not harmed by <strong>the</strong> Penobscot fiasco. He remained a selectman for Weymouth, Massachusetts, a representative in<strong>the</strong> General Court, and he helped devise <strong>the</strong> state's new constitution. He died aged sixty-nine in 1801. A memorialist wrote that Solomon Lovell was"esteemed and honored . . . respected and trusted in <strong>the</strong> counsels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State . . . his name has been handed down through <strong>the</strong> generations." A betterjudgment was surely made by a young marine at Majabigwaduce who wrote, "Mister Lovell would have done more good, and made a much morerespectable appearance in <strong>the</strong> deacon's seat <strong>of</strong> a country church, than at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> an American army."Captain Henry Mowat remained in <strong>the</strong> Royal Navy, his last command a frigate on which he died, probably <strong>of</strong> a heart attack, <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> coast <strong>of</strong> Virginia in1798. He is buried in St. John's churchyard, Hampton, Virginia. Brigadier-General Francis McLean returned to his command at Halifax, Nova Scotia,where he died, aged sixty-three, just two years after his successful defense <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> George. John Moore far transcended his old commander in fame andis now celebrated as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> greatest, and most humane, generals ever to serve in <strong>the</strong> British army. He died aged forty-eight at Corunna just as <strong>the</strong>had fought at Majabigwaduce, leading from <strong>the</strong> front.In 1780, a year after <strong>the</strong> expedition, Peleg Wadsworth was sent back to eastern Massachusetts as commander <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Penobscot region's militia. <strong>The</strong>British garrison at <strong>Fort</strong> George learned <strong>of</strong> his presence and sent a raiding party which, after a brief fight in which Wadsworth was wounded, captured him.Wadsworth was imprisoned in <strong>Fort</strong> George, where his wife, allowed to visit her husband, was told <strong>of</strong> a plan to move Wadsworth to a prison in Britain.Wadsworth and a second prisoner, Major Burton, <strong>the</strong>n devised and executed a daring escape which was wholly successful and today <strong>the</strong> bay north <strong>of</strong>Castine (as Majabigwaduce is now called) and west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> neck is named Wadsworth Cove after <strong>the</strong> place where <strong>the</strong> two escapees found a boat. PelegWadsworth remained in eastern Massachusetts. After <strong>the</strong> war he opened a hardware store and built a house in Portland that can still be seen (as canPaul Revere's house in Boston), and he served in <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Senate and as a representative for <strong>the</strong> province <strong>of</strong> Maine in <strong>the</strong> U.S. Congress. Hebecame a farmer in Hiram, and was a leader in <strong>the</strong> movement to make Maine a separate state, an ambition realized in 1820. He and his wife, Elizabeth,had ten children, and he died in 1829, aged eighty-one. George Washington held Peleg Wadsworth in <strong>the</strong> highest esteem and one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wadsworthfamily's treasured heirlooms was a lock <strong>of</strong> Washington's hair that was a gift from <strong>the</strong> first president. Peleg Wadsworth was, to my mind, a true hero and agreat man.<strong>The</strong> British stayed at Majabigwaduce, indeed it was <strong>the</strong> very last British post to be evacuated from <strong>the</strong> United States. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Loyalists moved toNova Scotia when <strong>the</strong> British left, some taking <strong>the</strong>ir houses with <strong>the</strong>m, though interestingly a number <strong>of</strong> British soldiers, including Sergeant Lawrence <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Royal Artillery, settled in Majabigwaduce after <strong>the</strong> war and, by all accounts, were warmly welcomed. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sunken cannon from <strong>the</strong> rebel fleetwere retrieved and put into British service, which explains why commemorative gun-barrels bearing <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts state seal are found as far afieldas Australia. <strong>The</strong>n, in <strong>the</strong> <strong>War</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1812, <strong>the</strong> British returned and captured Majabigwaduce again, and again garrisoned <strong>the</strong> fort, where <strong>the</strong>y stayed till <strong>the</strong>war's end. It was during this second occupation that <strong>the</strong> fort's walls were streng<strong>the</strong>ned with masonry and <strong>the</strong> British Canal, which is now a marshy ditch,was dug as a defensive work across <strong>the</strong> neck. <strong>Fort</strong> George still exists, a national monument now. It stands on <strong>the</strong> ridge above <strong>the</strong> Maine MaritimeAcademy in Castine, and is a peaceful, beautiful place. <strong>The</strong> ramparts are mostly overgrown with grass, and legend in Castine says that on still nights <strong>the</strong>ghost <strong>of</strong> a drummer boy can be heard beating his drum in <strong>the</strong> old fort. One version claims <strong>the</strong> ghost is a British boy who was inadvertently locked into amagazine when <strong>the</strong> garrison evacuated in 1784, o<strong>the</strong>rs say it is an American lad killed in <strong>the</strong> fighting <strong>of</strong> 1779. <strong>The</strong> earliest reference I can discover is inWilliam Hutchings's recollections where he avers that <strong>the</strong> boy, a rebel drummer, was killed at <strong>the</strong> Half Moon Battery. <strong>The</strong>re is a footpath which twists upand down <strong>the</strong> bluff by Dice Head (as Dyce's Head is now called), giving <strong>the</strong> visitor a chance to admire <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> those Americans who, on July28th, 1779, assaulted and won that position. <strong>The</strong> large boulder on <strong>the</strong> beach is called Trask's Rock after <strong>the</strong> boy fifer who played <strong>the</strong>re throughout <strong>the</strong>assault. Castine prospered during <strong>the</strong> 19th century, mostly because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> timber trade, and is now a picturesque and tranquil harbor town, and verymindful <strong>of</strong> its fascinating history. During one <strong>of</strong> my visits I was told that Paul Revere had stolen <strong>the</strong> expedition's pay chest, an allegation that is notsupported by any direct evidence, but indicative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scorn that some in this part <strong>of</strong> New England feel for a man revered elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> region.<strong>The</strong> quotations which head each chapter are, as far as possible, reproduced with <strong>the</strong>ir original spelling and capitalization. I took most <strong>of</strong> those quotationsfrom <strong>the</strong> Documentary History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Maine , volumes XVI and XVII, published by <strong>the</strong> Maine Historical Society in 1910 and 1913, respectively.Both those collections <strong>of</strong> contemporary documents were <strong>of</strong> enormous value, as was C. B. Kevitt's book, General Solomon Lovell and <strong>The</strong> PenobscotExpedition, published in 1976, which contains an account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition along with a selection <strong>of</strong> original sources. I also used Solomon Lovell's journal<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition, published by <strong>the</strong> Weymouth Historical Society in 1881 and John E. Cayford's <strong>The</strong> Penobscot Expedition, published privately in 1976. Ihave already mentioned George Buker's invaluable book, <strong>The</strong> Penobscot Expedition, which persuasively argues that <strong>the</strong> inquiries into <strong>the</strong> disaster werepart <strong>of</strong> a successful Massachusetts conspiracy to shift both blame and financial responsibility onto <strong>the</strong> federal government. Without doubt <strong>the</strong> liveliest andmost readable description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole expedition is found in Charles Bracelen Flood's book Rise, and Fight Again, published by Dodd Mead andCompany in 1976, which deals with four instances <strong>of</strong> rebel disaster on <strong>the</strong> road to independence. David Hackett Fischer's fascinating book PaulRevere's Ride (Oxford University Press, 1994) does not touch on <strong>the</strong> expedition <strong>of</strong> 1779 but is a superb guide to <strong>the</strong> events leading to <strong>the</strong> revolution andto Paul Revere's influential role in that period. Readers curious about <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> and reactions to Longfellow's poem (which Fischer describes as"grossly, systematically, and deliberatly inaccurate") will find his essay "Historiography" (printed in <strong>the</strong> book's end matter) invaluable. <strong>The</strong> best biography<strong>of</strong> Revere is A True Republican, <strong>the</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> Paul Revere , by Jayne E. Triber, published by <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Amherst, 1998. <strong>The</strong> famousLife <strong>of</strong> Colonel Paul Revere, by Elbridge Goss, published in 1891, is short on biographical details but contains a long treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PenobscotExpedition. A new biography <strong>of</strong> Sir John Moore is badly needed, but I found a useful source in his bro<strong>the</strong>r's two-volume biography, <strong>The</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> Lieutenant-General Sir John Moore, K.B. by James Carrick Moore, published by John Murray, London, in 1834. I discovered many details about 18th-century
- Page 2 and 3:
THEFORTA Novel of the Revolutionary
- Page 5 and 6:
A voice in the darkness, a knock at
- Page 7 and 8:
A Note on Names and TermsIn 1779 th
- Page 9:
Chapter OneThere was not much wind
- Page 12 and 13:
ecome a base for Britain's Royal Na
- Page 14 and 15:
"I bloody hope so," Moore said with
- Page 16 and 17:
Chapter TwoLieutenant-Colonel Paul
- Page 18 and 19:
magazines that would keep the ammun
- Page 20 and 21:
"So you will take the oath?" McLean
- Page 22 and 23:
Excerpts of a letter from the Selec
- Page 25 and 26:
inflate a company into a battalion
- Page 28 and 29:
"The world would be better without
- Page 30 and 31:
So now one less man would sail east
- Page 32 and 33:
Chapter FourThe fleet sailed eastwa
- Page 34:
"We were maltreated in Boston," Cal
- Page 37 and 38:
Tyrannicide had also confirmed that
- Page 39 and 40:
From the Oath demanded by Brigadier
- Page 41 and 42:
"Plug it!" Little shouted at the ma
- Page 43 and 44:
"You promoted me to general yesterd
- Page 45 and 46:
"Long as it takes."They had to wait
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter SixThe daylight was fading.
- Page 49 and 50:
"He's a patriot!" Lovell said in a
- Page 51 and 52:
"What are you doing?" Revere again
- Page 53 and 54:
A rowboat banged against the Centur
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter SevenThe first shots crashe
- Page 57 and 58:
sir," McClure shouted over the musk
- Page 59 and 60:
Solomon Lovell's heart seemed to mi
- Page 61 and 62: From Brigadier-General Lovell's des
- Page 63 and 64: emembered the tall American in his
- Page 65 and 66: "We thought him indestructible," De
- Page 67 and 68: could conceal men from the guns of
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter Nine"Where the devil is Rev
- Page 71 and 72: "Then they will have something to f
- Page 73 and 74: They would attack the battery.In th
- Page 75 and 76: Hundreds? He wondered. Maybe two hu
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter TenThe sun had not risen wh
- Page 79 and 80: Praise the Lord, Wadsworth thought,
- Page 81 and 82: marsh. The rebels patrolled that gr
- Page 83 and 84: Letter from Brigadier-General Lovel
- Page 85 and 86: on their flank?" Easily, Wadsworth
- Page 87 and 88: Commodore Saltonstall declared he w
- Page 89 and 90: ecome mired in pessimism and it nee
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter TwelveAnd, suddenly, there
- Page 93 and 94: at their sterns. Away to port was C
- Page 95 and 96: need men willing to make that attac
- Page 97 and 98: timber splinter to drive cloth into
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter ThirteenA Royal Marine at t
- Page 101 and 102: The fifty men filed through the aba
- Page 103 and 104: dared to hope that the British woul
- Page 105 and 106: From a letter by General Artemas Wa
- Page 107 and 108: the powder charges were being carri
- Page 109 and 110: fire, of the sparks flying and fall
- Page 111: Historical NoteThe Penobscot Expedi
- Page 115 and 116: About the AuthorBERNARD CORNWELL, "
- Page 117 and 118: CopyrightT HE FORT. Copyright (c) 2