13.07.2015 Views

Surgical management of chronic inguinal pain syndromes - Liespijn

Surgical management of chronic inguinal pain syndromes - Liespijn

Surgical management of chronic inguinal pain syndromes - Liespijn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results <strong>of</strong> our study are in concert with previous reports. In general, approximately threequarters <strong>of</strong> the patients will benefit from a neurectomy. Unfortunately, one fourth continuesto suffer from severe <strong>pain</strong>. If one studies the literature, reasons for treatmentfailure are unclear. Several factors may be important. First <strong>of</strong> all, appropriate patientselection is crucial. Patients with peripheral nerve injury may develop sensitization <strong>of</strong> thecentral nervous system over time. As a rule these patients are refractory to surgicalperipheral nerve interventions but should be treated with <strong>pain</strong> medication. Second, anadequate surgical technique is <strong>of</strong> great importance. The affected nerve needs to beidentified in a scarred operative field and resected as far proximal and distal as possibleburying the nerve ends in healthy muscular tissue. To prevent neuroma formation inunaffected neurectomized nerve ends, we believe that only the affected nerve(s) shouldbe removed, ‘the tailored approach’. A learning curve is present and failures significantlydepended on previously received <strong>pain</strong> treatment.A surgical neurectomy provides good long-term <strong>pain</strong> relief for postherniorrhaphy groinneuralgia in the majority <strong>of</strong> patients. Hernia surgeons should take their responsibilityfor this iatrogenic complication and incorporate selective neurectomy in their surgicalarmamentarium. Future research should focus on identifying additional factors associatedwith unfavourable surgical outcome.As high level evidence based treatment regimes for iatrogenic <strong>inguinal</strong> <strong>pain</strong> <strong>syndromes</strong>are currently lacking, patients usually receive a random combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>pain</strong> medication,local nerve blocks or an occasional surgical neurectomy. A randomized controlled trial('GroinPain Trial') was constructed to identify the optimal treatment modality in thispopulation. In chapter 7 aim and rationale <strong>of</strong> this trial are presented. Adult patientswith <strong>chronic</strong> postherniorrhaphy <strong>inguinal</strong> <strong>pain</strong> (> 3 months) caused by <strong>inguinal</strong> nerveentrapment with a temporary but significant <strong>pain</strong> reduction after a lidocain nerve blockare eligible for randomization. They either receive repetitive nerve blocks with lidocain,corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid, or a 'tailored' surgical neurectomy. Patient enrollmentstarted in February 2006 and is expected to end in June 2011. Initial results will beavailable towards the end <strong>of</strong> 2011. This trial is the first randomized controlled effortcomparing two invasive treatment modalities for peripheral <strong>inguinal</strong> nerve entrapment.As awareness and knowledge on <strong>chronic</strong> neuropathic <strong>pain</strong> after <strong>inguinal</strong> herniorrhaphyin the near future is expected to increase, findings <strong>of</strong> this trial will aid in optimizingcare for this patient population.Pfannenstiel incisions are also incidentally associated with <strong>chronic</strong> lower abdominal<strong>pain</strong> due to nerve entrapment (2-4%) 2 . Treatment options include peripheral nerve blocksor a neurectomy <strong>of</strong> neighbouring nerves. Knowledge on adequate (surgical) <strong>management</strong>is limited. In chapter 8 we assessed long-term <strong>pain</strong> relief after local nerve blocksor neurectomy in patients suffering from <strong>chronic</strong> <strong>pain</strong> due to Pfannenstiel-inducednerve entrapment. Patients treated for iliohypogastric and/ or ilio<strong>inguinal</strong> neuralgiafollowing a Pfannenstiel incision received a questionnaire assessing current <strong>pain</strong> intensity(by 5-point Verbal Rating Scale), complications and overall satisfaction. Twenty-sevenwomen with Pfannenstiel-related neuralgia were identified over a seven-year period.A single diagnostic nerve block provided long-term <strong>pain</strong> relief in 5 patients. This phenomenonmay be explained by resetting the <strong>pain</strong> threshold to normal levels. A similareffect is occasionally observed in postherniorrhaphy groin neuralgia. Satisfaction in theremaining women undergoing neurectomy (n=22) was good to excellent in 73%,moderate in 14%, and poor in 13%. Smaller series show similar success rates 25,26 . Interestingly,successful treatment improved sexual intercourse-related <strong>pain</strong> in most females,a phenomenon that has never been described before in literature. Co-morbidities (endometriosis,lumbosacral radicular syndrome) and earlier <strong>pain</strong> treatment were identifiedas risk factors for surgical failure. Some cases <strong>of</strong> treatment failure may also beexplained from the concept <strong>of</strong> genetic susceptibility for <strong>chronic</strong> <strong>pain</strong> syndrome developmentas described in postherniorrhaphy groin <strong>pain</strong> as well 7 . This study demonstratesthat peripheral nerve blocking provides long-term <strong>pain</strong> reduction in some individualswith post-Pfannenstiel neuralgia. An iliohypogastric or ilio<strong>inguinal</strong> nerve neurectomyis a safe and effective procedure in most remaining patients. Gynaecologists must beprepared to <strong>of</strong>fer a surgical consultation to this group <strong>of</strong> patients.5. Occupational disability after <strong>inguinal</strong> hernia repairResumption <strong>of</strong> daily leisure activities and occupational obligations is considered animportant outcome measure after hernia repair. However, the exact percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>pain</strong>patients confronted with occupational disability is unknown. In chapter 9 the effect <strong>of</strong>operative and non-operative treatment on resolving occupational disability due to postherniorrhaphy<strong>inguinal</strong> neuralgia is evaluated.All relevant studies on treatment for postherniorrhaphy <strong>inguinal</strong> neuralgia were reviewedwith respect to effect on occupational disability. A recently published registry <strong>of</strong>patients with postherniorrhaphy neuralgia treated by neurectomy was analyzed foroccupational disability. Patients were contacted by telephone and given a set <strong>of</strong> predeterminedquestions concerning pre- and postoperative disability. Finally, a cost-benefitanalysis was made.Only 4 out <strong>of</strong> 23 studies on neurectomy for <strong>inguinal</strong> neuralgia reported on occupationaldisability as an outcome measure. These few studies demonstrated that some 56 to 100%<strong>of</strong> the patients could resume their occupational obligations after <strong>pain</strong> treatment. Studieson non-operative <strong>pain</strong> treatment and occupational disability appeared unavailable.Forty-eight patients previously treated by neurectomy were analyzed for occupationaldisability. Severe <strong>pain</strong> disabled 13 patients and a neurectomy resulted in total recoveryin 7 (7/13, 54%). An estimating cost-benefit analysis showed that effective <strong>pain</strong> treatmentsuch as a tailored neurectomy can save a minimum <strong>of</strong> € 1.8 million <strong>of</strong> workers’ com-142 Chapter 10143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!