Brennan Report - Department of Health and Children
Brennan Report - Department of Health and Children Brennan Report - Department of Health and Children
Report of the Commission on Financial Management and Control Systems in the Health Service1. IntroductionIn a modern, democratic society every citizen should have access to a quality public health system.Thepeople who work at all levels of our health service are entitled to expect the system to be organisedin a way which best allows them to use their skills and energy to provide quality care within theresources available.We approached our task with the belief that the primary responsibility of the health system mustbe to meet the needs of the patient or other person using the service. All the analysis andrecommendations that follow are made with the objective of providing a better, more costeffective,more accountable system where the patient/service user is the number one priority.2. Health Service SpendingThe Irish health service employs almost 100,000 people and spends almost ¤ 9 billion annually. It hasgrown substantially in the last five years. Between 1997 and 2002 spending has gone up by 125% andemployment has risen by over 25,000.Demographic changes will increase the demands on the health system. To continue to increase theresources at the rates achieved in recent years is unsustainable; hence much greater effectiveness andefficiency will be required.3. Evidence on Adequacy of ResourcesDespite the substantial increase in health spending, we heard evidence that:● 3,000 additional acute hospital beds and 1,000 additional medical Consultants are needed tosatisfy current demand.● Some of the most expensive acute hospital beds in the health service are usedinappropriately.● Some of the time of Consultants is wasted because they have to cancel admissions,surgery or treatments when their beds are reassigned to patients admitted through Accidentand Emergency departments.● The underutilisation or underprovision of walk-in (ambulatory) day surgery was seriouslycompromising the throughput of patients and productivity.These conflicting perspectives between the need for more money on the one hand and theopportunities for eliminating waste and increasing productivity in the use of existing resources on theother, highlight the complexity of the management challenge in running the Irish health service and theneed to evaluate whether existing resources could satisfy demand by radically restructuring how thoseresources are organised and managed.4. Our ViewIn our view many of the problems are fundamentally structural. They relate to how the system isorganised and managed. We believe that just improving the systems of financial management andcontrol will do little to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health expenditure unless there isfundamental reform in how the system is organised and managed. For this reason we haverecommended very substantial changes to the way the system is structured and managed.6
Executive SummaryWe do not underestimate the challenges involved in introducing change on the scale we recommend.However, those who work in the health service and whose commitment we acknowledge deserve noless than the opportunity to work in a system which is much better managed and controlled and sowill support them in doing what they wish to do; offer the highest quality service to the public.5. The IssuesThe main problems we have identified in the areas of financial management and control are:●●●●●●●●Management and control of services and resources is too fragmented; there is no one personor agency with managerial accountability for how the overall system performs on a day-to-daybasis.Those who make decisions (mainly Consultants and other medical practitioners) which commitresources are not accountable for that expenditure and the outputs to be delivered.Systems of governance, financial control, risk management and performance management needto be developed further.The capacity of existing systems to provide relevant, timely and reliable information for linkingresources to outputs/outcomes is severely limited.There is insufficient evaluation of existing expenditure and too much focus on obtainingfunding for new developments.The capacity of existing systems to develop cost consciousness and provide incentives tomanage costs is severely constrained by the under-development of systems such as activitybased costing.The usefulness of data for resource management and for strategic planning purposes is limitedbecause the data is not being interpreted by the clinicians treating the patients (Consultants andGPs).Patient cost information is not available. Such data is essential to any review of the system ofallocating funds or in deciding where the most cost effective treatment can be obtained forvarious conditions.6. Proposals For ChangeWe recommend that:The ExecutiveA new Executive should be established outside the Department of Health and Children to assumemanagement responsibility for the delivery of health care in Ireland and for planning and managing theapplication of the resources used by the health service in a comprehensive integrated way.●●●●●●The new Executive should operate under a board, whose Chairman should report to theMinister for Health and Children.A substantial number of existing executive agencies should be subsumed by the new Executive.Staff recruitment should be by open competition.The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Executive should be accountable to the board of theExecutive.The CEO of the Executive should be accountable for the performance of the CEOs of theregional health boards.The CEOs of regional health boards should retain their role as accounting officers.7
- Page 1 and 2: Commission onFinancial Managementan
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Page 5 and 6: 6.4 COMMUNITY DRUG SCHEMES 80Medica
- Page 7: Executive SummaryEXECUTIVE SUMMARYT
- Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary"demand-led" schem
- Page 13 and 14: Terms of ReferenceTERMS OF REFERENC
- Page 15 and 16: GlossaryEstimates for Public Servic
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Introduction and Backgrou
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 Introduction and Backgrou
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2 Overview and Issues2.2 OR
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesAppend
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesFigure
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2 Overview and Issuesother
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesTable
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesFigure
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 Overview and Issues●●
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesIn 200
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesThe an
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesTable
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 2 Overview and IssuesProble
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3 Managing the Health Servi
<strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Commission on Financial Management <strong>and</strong> Control Systems in the <strong>Health</strong> Service1. IntroductionIn a modern, democratic society every citizen should have access to a quality public health system.Thepeople who work at all levels <strong>of</strong> our health service are entitled to expect the system to be organisedin a way which best allows them to use their skills <strong>and</strong> energy to provide quality care within theresources available.We approached our task with the belief that the primary responsibility <strong>of</strong> the health system mustbe to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the patient or other person using the service. All the analysis <strong>and</strong>recommendations that follow are made with the objective <strong>of</strong> providing a better, more costeffective,more accountable system where the patient/service user is the number one priority.2. <strong>Health</strong> Service SpendingThe Irish health service employs almost 100,000 people <strong>and</strong> spends almost ¤ 9 billion annually. It hasgrown substantially in the last five years. Between 1997 <strong>and</strong> 2002 spending has gone up by 125% <strong>and</strong>employment has risen by over 25,000.Demographic changes will increase the dem<strong>and</strong>s on the health system. To continue to increase theresources at the rates achieved in recent years is unsustainable; hence much greater effectiveness <strong>and</strong>efficiency will be required.3. Evidence on Adequacy <strong>of</strong> ResourcesDespite the substantial increase in health spending, we heard evidence that:● 3,000 additional acute hospital beds <strong>and</strong> 1,000 additional medical Consultants are needed tosatisfy current dem<strong>and</strong>.● Some <strong>of</strong> the most expensive acute hospital beds in the health service are usedinappropriately.● Some <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> Consultants is wasted because they have to cancel admissions,surgery or treatments when their beds are reassigned to patients admitted through Accident<strong>and</strong> Emergency departments.● The underutilisation or underprovision <strong>of</strong> walk-in (ambulatory) day surgery was seriouslycompromising the throughput <strong>of</strong> patients <strong>and</strong> productivity.These conflicting perspectives between the need for more money on the one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> theopportunities for eliminating waste <strong>and</strong> increasing productivity in the use <strong>of</strong> existing resources on theother, highlight the complexity <strong>of</strong> the management challenge in running the Irish health service <strong>and</strong> theneed to evaluate whether existing resources could satisfy dem<strong>and</strong> by radically restructuring how thoseresources are organised <strong>and</strong> managed.4. Our ViewIn our view many <strong>of</strong> the problems are fundamentally structural. They relate to how the system isorganised <strong>and</strong> managed. We believe that just improving the systems <strong>of</strong> financial management <strong>and</strong>control will do little to improve the efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> health expenditure unless there isfundamental reform in how the system is organised <strong>and</strong> managed. For this reason we haverecommended very substantial changes to the way the system is structured <strong>and</strong> managed.6