A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...
A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ... A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...
Board of Directors Part 114 June 2013Medicine for the Elderly on Ward 22 recorded all patients as saying they hadwaited 10-30 minutes for the bell to be answered. It may be that some patientshere were unable to estimate time accurately. This is a concern for this wardbut is not representative of the hospital overall.The patients who did not have call bells said they were unhappy or feltinsecure about it. These patients were in escalation beds. Some patients feltthat the fact they had not needed to use their bell reflected well on the level ofcare they were receiving.5.2.6 Have you been able to sleep well whilst in hospital?41% of patients reported that they had slept well whilst on the wards, with onepatient stating that he had slept better here than at home! Ward 24 didespecially well here, having had a focus on helping patients to have a goodnight's sleep. However, 59% had not slept well (some said they did not sleepwell at home either) and gave a range of reasons with the most common atthe top:Other patients being noisy – e.g. coughing and shouting – andwandering aboutNoise from staff – talking and laughing loudly, moving beds, newadmissionsNoisy equipment – bleeps and buzzers, nebulizers etc.Lights not being dimmed early enough or being too brightGeneral hospital and strange noisesPatient’s own medical symptoms or pain – doctors slow to tend to themEnvironment – cold ward, bad smells, uncomfortable bed clothingBeing away from home and generally unsettled and anxiousNot being tired5The Hospital at NightQuality/Performance
Board of Directors Part 114 June 20135.2.7 Overall, on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being bad and 5 being excellent),how good is the care at night on this ward?SCALE 1 2 3 4 5Ward 1 0 0 2 5 4Ward 2 0 0 1 5 4Ward 9 0 0 1 3 6Ward 14 0 0 1 7 2Ward 15 0 0 1 8 1Ward 22 0 0 3 7 0Ward 24 0 0 1 2 7AMU 0 0 0 1 9Stroke 1 0 3 5 1Total 1 0 13 43 3437% felt their care was excellent, with AMU performing exceptionally well andWard 24 also doing very well. 47% felt their care was very good, with Wards14,15 and 22 doing well here. Only 14% gave the middle ranking to their wardfor night-time care, with responses spread across most wards and one personthought their care deserved the lowest score of 1. Six of the wards scoredentirely 4 or 5. On this scale, 99% of our patients thought their care wasfair/good or better.5.2.8 Additional comments from patients:Comments relating to the standard of care receivedI received excellent care for an asthma attack during the night.Amazing, excellent, kind, considerate staff.Willing to do anything for patients.Very attentive at night. Couldn’t have had better treatment.Excellent care from night staff. Good all round. Care at night generallyvery good.Nurses are very caring, treat all patients with care and respect.Night care better than day care teams.Not all staff as committed to patient care as others.“We’re very lucky to have such a good hospital here in Bournemouth”.Enjoyed being here, superb people. Very friendly. Absolutely fantastic.Sensitive to my needs, high level of personal consideration.6The Hospital at NightQuality/Performance
- Page 1 and 2: A meeting of the Board of Directors
- Page 3 and 4: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
- Page 5 and 6: In response to a question from KT a
- Page 7 and 8: how this was being rolled out throu
- Page 9 and 10: still challenged at times;• that
- Page 11 and 12: (c)Stroke Performance (Presentation
- Page 13 and 14: • nurse staffing was already bein
- Page 15 and 16: (b) Informatics Strategy (Appendix
- Page 17 and 18: (b)Monitor’s Guidance for NHS Pro
- Page 19 and 20: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
- Page 21 and 22: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
- Page 23 and 24: Quality Impact Assessments 2013/14T
- Page 26 and 27: Example of completed QIATransformat
- Page 28 and 29: Board of Directors Part 114th June
- Page 30 and 31: Board of Directors Part 114th June
- Page 32 and 33: Area Indicator Measure Target Monit
- Page 34 and 35: Trust Performance Dashboard - Quali
- Page 36 and 37: Board of DirectorsJune 2013Financia
- Page 38 and 39: Board of DirectorsJune 20138. Recom
- Page 40 and 41: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
- Page 42 and 43: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 44 and 45: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 46 and 47: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 50 and 51: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 52 and 53: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 54 and 55: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 56 and 57: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 58 and 59: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 60 and 61: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 62 and 63: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 64 and 65: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 66 and 67: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 68 and 69: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 70 and 71: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 72 and 73: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 74 and 75: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 76 and 77: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 78 and 79: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 80 and 81: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
- Page 82 and 83: EnforcementGuidance28 March 2013Mon
- Page 84 and 85: ForewordThe Health and Social Care
- Page 86 and 87: 1 IntroductionThe Health and Social
- Page 88 and 89: Table 1.1 Monitor’s enforcement p
- Page 90 and 91: Licence enforcementDiscretionary re
- Page 92 and 93: Competition lawMonitor has concurre
- Page 94 and 95: 2 PrioritisationThis chapter sets o
- Page 96 and 97: We also recognise that the actions
Board of Directors Part 114 June 2013Medicine for the Elderly on Ward 22 recorded all patients as saying they hadwaited 10-30 minutes for the bell to be answered. It may be that some patientshere were unable to estimate time accurately. This is a concern for this wardbut is not representative of the hospital overall.The patients who did not have call bells said they were unhappy or feltinsecure about it. These patients were in escalation beds. Some patients feltthat the fact they had not needed to use their bell reflected well on the level ofcare they were receiving.5.2.6 Have you been able to sleep well whilst in hospital?41% of patients reported that they had slept well whilst on the wards, with onepatient stating that he had slept better here than at home! Ward 24 didespecially well here, having had a focus on helping patients to have a goodnight's sleep. However, 59% had not slept well (some said they did not sleepwell at home either) and gave a range of reasons with the most common atthe top:Other patients being noisy – e.g. coughing and shouting – andwandering aboutNoise from staff – talking and laughing loudly, moving beds, newadmissionsNoisy equipment – bleeps and buzzers, nebulizers etc.Lights not being dimmed early enough or being too brightGeneral hospital and strange noisesPatient’s own medical symptoms or pain – doctors slow to tend to themEnvironment – cold ward, bad smells, uncomfortable bed clothingBeing away from home and generally unsettled and anxiousNot being tired5The Hospital at NightQuality/Performance