13.07.2015 Views

Politics, Public Issues and the Promotion of Urdu Literature: Avadh ...

Politics, Public Issues and the Promotion of Urdu Literature: Avadh ...

Politics, Public Issues and the Promotion of Urdu Literature: Avadh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ULRIKE STARK • 87October 1871 at <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Maharaja <strong>of</strong> Patiala. He died in 1876 at<strong>the</strong> early age <strong>of</strong> thirty. 55A new era dawned for AA when, in 1870, Maulvµ Ghul≥m Mu√ammadKh≥n (d. 1904) assumed <strong>the</strong> editorship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper. A native <strong>of</strong> Delhi, hehad spent part <strong>of</strong> his youth in <strong>the</strong> company <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nawab <strong>of</strong> Patauri <strong>and</strong>subsequently gained experience as a journalist <strong>and</strong> editor in Meerut <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r places. Ghul≥m Mu√ammad Kh≥n was a pupil <strong>of</strong> Mirz≥ Gh≥lib <strong>and</strong>composed poetry in Persian <strong>and</strong> <strong>Urdu</strong> under <strong>the</strong> pen name “Tapish.”During <strong>the</strong> eight years <strong>of</strong> his editorship AA thrived. 56 Relations betweenhim <strong>and</strong> Munshi Naval Kishore, which for <strong>the</strong> longest time had beenamiable, took a dramatic turn in 1876, when, after a supposedly seriousaltercation between <strong>the</strong> two men, Ghul≥m Mu√ammad Kh≥n was dismissed.What prompted <strong>the</strong> dispute is not known. It may have had to dowith Ghul≥m Mu√ammad Kh≥n’s editorial policy, notably his overt support<strong>of</strong> Sir Sayyid A√mad Kh≥n’s reformist paper Tahÿµbu ’l-Akhl≥q which,as noted earlier, caused Munshi Naval Kishore some embarrassment. Atall events, it was none o<strong>the</strong>r than Sir Sayyid who personally came to <strong>the</strong>editor’s rescue: in an article appearing in <strong>the</strong> Aligarh Institute Gazette <strong>of</strong>29 September 1876 he expressed his deep regret over Ghul≥mMu√ammad’s dismissal <strong>and</strong> pointed out that Naval Kishore had carelesslylet go <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most capable editors <strong>of</strong> his paper, to whom AA owedits entire success. 57The letter did not fail in its purpose: Ghul≥mMu√ammad was promptly reinstalled in his capacity as editor. Yet, he didnot remain with AA for much longer; several months later he decided toresign as editor <strong>and</strong> leave <strong>the</strong> paper for good. In May 1877 he informed<strong>the</strong> readers <strong>of</strong> AA that having devoted all his energy to <strong>the</strong> paper for <strong>the</strong>past eight years <strong>and</strong> having ruined his health <strong>and</strong> eyesight in <strong>the</strong> process,he was to quit AA <strong>and</strong> start his own paper Mushµr-e QaiΩar-e Hindinstead. 58There is a ra<strong>the</strong>r dubious claim, probably going back to Garcin deTassy, that, following Tapish, for a short period Maul≥n≥ Sayyid Amjad‘Alµ “Ashharµ” (b. 1851) took charge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper. 59 This claim is not sub-55 Garcin de Tassy, 1876, pp. 136–7.56 Apparently Munshµ Fid≥ ‘Alµ “‘Aish” was assistant editor at <strong>the</strong> time.N∑r≥nµ, p. 74.57 The article is reprinted in Khurshµd, p. 182.58 For Tapish, see ¿≥birµ, pp. 99–104.59 Ibid., pp. 104–6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!