The Scottish Celtic review

282 Oaelic Orthography— Common Mistakes.that, considering tlie history and affinities of this preposition, theexpressions witli an are the more accurate.(2.) But we frequently cannot substitute amn an for an. Thisapplies more especially to the archaic adverbial phrases consistingof a noun, and the preposition an or a{n) such as " a muigh," " amach," "an diu," which are constantly used in the living language.We cannot say " aun am muigh " for " a muigh " (out, foris)=" ammuigh = " Old Gael. " im-muigh " (the prep, im for in before afor" a mach " (out, foras) = " am mach " = Old Gael. " im-mach "labial, and muigh, dat. of magh, a plain), nor " ann am mach "(the same prep, im for in and inach, ace. of magh), nor " ann andiu " for " an diu " (to-day) = Old Gael. " in-diu " (the prep, inand the dat. or abl. of dia, day). These phrases show that annan is of modern origin.Our first reason, however, is alone sufficient to prove that theprep, an is not an abbreviation, but the full and regular modernform of the ancient prep, in (in), and that, therefore, the spellingwith an apostrophe is erroneous.IV. The nasal termination of the conjunction gu'n erroneouslyregarded as merely a euphonic letter.In recent editions of the Gaelic Scriptures, the conjunctiongun (that, quod) is printed with a hyphen between git and n,to indicate that n is not an organic part of the conjunction, butmerely a euphonic letter added, in certain positions, to gu, whichis thus regarded as the proper conjunction. In support of thisview the authority of Br. Stewart is often quoted (ct. Gramm., p.170). But it is overlooked that, in the Pentateuch edited by thatdistinguished scholar along with Dr. John Stuart of Luss, andpublished in 18:20 (eight years after the publication of the secondedition of the Gaelic Grammar), gu'n is printed with an aposti'opheto show that 'n is a contraction. Nor is it taken sufficientlyinto account that it was not until long after Dr. Stewart's timethat the study of ancient Gaelic began to throw new light uponthe construction and idioms of the modern language.This holdstrue especially in regard to the adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions,which are most unsatisfactorilj' dealt with in Stewart'swork.What has led to n of gun being regarded as a euphonic letteris the fact that, although invariably used before verbs beginningwith a vowel, as (Luke xxii. 30) "gu'n ith," "gu'n 61," it is fre-