13.07.2015 Views

The Scottish Celtic review

The Scottish Celtic review

The Scottish Celtic review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

——;Till', Lawif of Auslaut in Irish. 103mental of the i- stems in i; e.g., onati from mat is (see Grassmann'sWiJiterbuch). Tliis supposition is supported by the fact that, sofar as I know, tlie Irish dative without a preposition occursonly with the function of an instrumental. It is, however,possible that this i may have originated from a primitive i-iin which case, this Irish dative would be an original locative,like the Ionic -rroXl. But the locative form iroXei for iroXejtalso would have led in Irish to a similar contraction, sincefrom tcgesi, the locative of an as- stem, the Irish tig has beenformed (see Excursus ii. 6). Of an original i-ai, or even -aj-ai,which would be a genuine dative-formation, more would probablyhave survived than the mere penetrating of i into thepreceding syllable. Finally, we have to mention that the dat.sing, of the consonantal stems and of the fem. o-stems, is,likewise, chai'acterised by internal i, and that the force ofanalogy may have contributed its part to give, as far as possible,one form to this case.XIV. u stood originally in the last syllable. In the monosyllabicparticle su, so = Skr. su (Z. SG3), it is either preservedas lb or weakened into o. In polysyllabic words, the i(- morefrequently, but not always, penetrated into the preceding syllable.Cf the remarks on -us and -u'ln under B. III. and VII.Here come under consideration :1. <strong>The</strong> nom. and ace. sing, of the neut. stems in -it.E.g., siith (fetus), for prehistoric siht-u (related to Skr. siUiis,fem. pregnancy), cf Lat. corn-u ; dorus (door), for originaldvarast-u. Cf Ebel in Beitr. zur Vergl. Spr. vi. 223.2. <strong>The</strong> 3rd pers. sing, and plur. of the imperative.E.g., berad for prehistoric herat-u — Skr. hharatit ; berut (theyshall bear), for prehistoric bcrant-u = Skr. bharant-u. In anycase, this u would have been lost without a trace ; but, especially,the 3rd pers. sing, is hardly to be explained otherwise, sinceits d or th (for original t) could not have been the originalauslaut of this form, but must necessarily have had a vowelafter it. That the dropped m does not always influence the aof the preceding syllable, is proved by the short word cath (tight,combat), for prehistoric cat-us (cf Old Gaul. Catu-rix in Gluck'sKelt. Namen, p. 47), 0. H. G. hadu-, A. S. headho-.XV. tl stood originally in the last .syllable. Before it disappearedit was shortened to u. Here come under consideration:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!