13.07.2015 Views

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 L. Q<strong>in</strong> and T. Kunzsidered broken dur<strong>in</strong>g transmission, and performance will be affected. Table 1 showsthe comparison for DSR and AODV with ideal and shadow<strong>in</strong>g models for different βvalues, which correspond to different natural environments. All the simulations arerun <strong>in</strong> a 1500x300 m area with 50 mobile nodes, 20 sources, pause time 0 second,maximum speed is 20m/s. Simulation time is 500 seconds. Each scenario is run onlyonce to get an <strong>in</strong>itial idea about the performance degradation. As the β value determ<strong>in</strong>esaverage transmission range, compar<strong>in</strong>g the results has to be done with case, wewill expound on this issue later, where we will consider node density for fair comparison.Fig. 1. Signal Power Change over a Wireless L<strong>in</strong>k for (left) Shadow<strong>in</strong>g Model, (right) IdealModel. They do not use the same power scale.Table 1. Performance Comparisons of DSR and AODV with Different Propagation Models.DSRAODVDeliveryRatio %ControlMessagePacketDelay (s)DeliveryRatioControlMessagePacketDelay (s)Ideal 97.69 12386 0.036 98.36 31617 0.137Modelβ=2.0 98.60 18616 0.131 92.15 25597 0.807β=2.1 82.36 50725 1.498 83.89 61062 0.988β=2.2 24.62 114533 2.541 71.08 87871 1.202β=2.3 18.81 124180 2.779 58.41 127451 1.459β=2.4 9.98 150840 2.768 43.32 126284 1.752β=2.5 4.31 204613 3.587 32.95 128958 2.053β=2.6 4.08 242623 3.623 26.55 120622 2.314Delivery Ratio: total number of received packets/total number of sent packets.Control Message: total number of control messages sent.Packet Delay: average time a packet is <strong>in</strong> transit from source to the dest<strong>in</strong>ation.The impact of the shadow<strong>in</strong>g model on the performance of DSR and AODV is a significantlydecreased packet delivery ratio (PDR), <strong>in</strong>creased number of control messagesand <strong>in</strong>creased packet latency. The bigger the β value, which corresponds toshorter transmission range, the lower the PDR for both protocols. Also, the averagepacket latency with a shadow<strong>in</strong>g model can reach several seconds. Compar<strong>in</strong>g the twoprotocols, AODV has better PDR, and packet delay does not <strong>in</strong>crease as fast as DSRwith the β value. Furthermore, we observed the follow<strong>in</strong>g:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!