13.07.2015 Views

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

194 S.O. Krumke et al.The follow<strong>in</strong>g claim relates the weight w(x, y) to the power threshold valuep(x, y). We omit the proof of this claim.Claim. For each edge {x, y} ∈E T1 , w(x, y) ≥ p(x, y).⊓⊔As a simple consequence of the above claim, we haveW (E T1 ) ≤∑w(x, y) ≤ (1 − 1/n) OPT(I),{x,y}∈E T1and this completes the proof of Part (b) of the lemma.⊓⊔The next lemma, which follows from Lemma 2, uses the performance guaranteeprovided <strong>by</strong> the approximation algorithm A used <strong>in</strong> Step 2 of the heuristic.Lemma 3. Let T (V,E T ) denote the tree produced <strong>by</strong> A at the end of Step 2of Heuristic Gen-Diameter-Total-Power. LetW (E T ) = ∑ {x,y}∈E Tp(x, y)denote the total weight of the edges <strong>in</strong> T .Let(α, β) denote the performanceguarantee provided <strong>by</strong> A for the Mctdc problem. Then,(a) Dia(T ) ≤ 2 αD.(b) W (E T ) ≤ β (1 − 1/n) OPT(I).⊓⊔We are now ready to prove Theorem 2.Proof of Theorem 2: Consider the spann<strong>in</strong>g tree T (V,E T ) produced <strong>in</strong> Step 2of the heuristic. We will first show that every edge {x, y} ∈ E T is also <strong>in</strong>G f (V,E f ), the graph <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>by</strong> the power assignment constructed <strong>in</strong> Step 3of the heuristic. To see this, notice that f(x) is the largest weight of an edge<strong>in</strong>cident on x <strong>in</strong> T . Thus, f(x) ≥ p(x, y). Similarly, f(y) ≥ p(x, y). Thus, everyedge <strong>in</strong> E T is also <strong>in</strong> E f . S<strong>in</strong>ce Dia(T ) ≤ 2 αD, and addition of edges cannot<strong>in</strong>crease the diameter, it follows that Dia(G f ) ≤ 2 αD.To bound DTP(I), we note from Lemma 3 that W (E T ) ≤ β (1 −1/n) OPT(I). In the power assignment constructed <strong>in</strong> Step 3, the weight ofany edge can be assigned to at most two nodes (namely, the end po<strong>in</strong>ts of thatedge). Thus, the total power assigned to all the nodes is at most 2 W (E T ). Inother words, DTP(I) ≤ 2 β (1 − 1/n) OPT(I), and this completes the proof ofTheorem 2.⊓⊔Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Approximation Algorithms from Theorem 2. We now briefly<strong>in</strong>dicate how several bicriteria approximation algorithms for the 〈Undir, Diameter,TotalP〉 problem can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g Gen-Diameter-Total-Power <strong>in</strong> conjunction with known bicriteria approximation results for theMctdc problem.1. For any fixed ɛ>0,a(2⌈log 2 n⌉, (1+ɛ) ⌈log 2 n⌉)-approximation algorithm ispresented <strong>in</strong> [11] for the Mctdc problem. Us<strong>in</strong>g this algorithm and sett<strong>in</strong>gɛ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!