13.07.2015 Views

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

Page 2 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2865 Edited by G. Goos ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Topology Control Problems 1911. We show that if the diameter constra<strong>in</strong>t cannot be violated, the 〈Undir, Diameter,TotalP〉 problem cannot be approximated to with<strong>in</strong> an Ω(log n)factor unless P = NP. This result holds even when the diameter boundD = 2. (Note that the problem is trivial when D = 1.)2. We show that us<strong>in</strong>g any (α, β)-approximation algorithm for the Mctdcproblem, one can devise a (2α, 2(1− 1/n) β)-approximation algorithm for〈Undir, Diameter, TotalP〉 problem. This result is based on a generalframework presented <strong>in</strong> [10] for approximat<strong>in</strong>g the total power objective.Utiliz<strong>in</strong>g this general framework and known bicriteria approximations forthe Mctdc problem, we obta<strong>in</strong> several bicriteria approximation algorithmsfor the 〈Undir, Diameter, TotalP〉 problem. (See Section 4.2.)3. For every fixed <strong>in</strong>teger ∆ ≥ 2, we show that the 〈Undir, Deg LB, TotalP〉problem is NP-complete. Also, we present an approximation algorithm witha performance guarantee of 2(∆+1)(1−1/n) for the problem. This algorithmproduces a power assignment that <strong>in</strong>duces a connected graph <strong>in</strong> which eachnode has degree at least ∆. The performance guarantee is with respect to theoptimal total power value. (Details regard<strong>in</strong>g these results will be <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> a complete version of this paper.)4. While the above results are under the symmetric power threshold model, weconsider the 〈Undir, Connected, TotalP〉 problem under the asymmetricpower threshold model. We show that the problem cannot be approximatedto with<strong>in</strong> an Ω(log n) factor unless P = NP. We also presentan O(log n) approximation algorithm for the problem.3.2 Related WorkReference [10] provides a general approach that leads to an approximation frameworkfor m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g total power. Us<strong>in</strong>g that framework, two new approximationalgorithms for 〈Undir, 2-Node Connected, TotalP〉 and 〈Undir, 2-Edge Connected, TotalP〉 with an asymptotic approximation ratio of 8 arepresented <strong>in</strong> [10]. Both of the approximation ratios are improved to 4 <strong>in</strong> [6]. Reference[3] shows that the 〈Dir, Strongly Connected, TotalP〉 problem isNP-complete and presents a 2-approximation algorithm for the problem. Cal<strong>in</strong>escuet al. [4] improve the approximation ratio to (1+ln 2). The approximationratio is further improved to 5/3 <strong>in</strong> a journal submission based on [4].4 Results for Diameter Problems4.1 Lower Bound on ApproximationThe follow<strong>in</strong>g theorem can be proven us<strong>in</strong>g an approximation preserv<strong>in</strong>g reductionfrom the M<strong>in</strong>imum Set Cover (Msc) problem. The proof is omitted dueto space constra<strong>in</strong>t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!