13.07.2015 Views

Performance Monitoring Report for April 2008 to March 2009

Performance Monitoring Report for April 2008 to March 2009

Performance Monitoring Report for April 2008 to March 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DescriptionYear EndTarget31/03/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>31/03/09 (Q4)(Cumulative)<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Against YearEnd TargetTrend from31/12/08(Q3)Implement an actionplan by 31/03/09 <strong>to</strong>retain Inves<strong>to</strong>rs inPeopleaccreditationAction PlanAchievedGInstall 1,500 childsafety equipmentpackages by31/03/091,5001,969GReduce the averagevoids re-let time <strong>to</strong>50 days by 31/3/09.50 days34.8 daysGAverage number ofdays <strong>to</strong> completenon-urgent repairs10 days6.10 daysGReduce net rentarrears from£3,130,729 <strong>to</strong>£2,800,000 by31/03/09£2,800,000£2,473,741.99 G3.2 Analysis identifying the reasons <strong>for</strong> failure and corrective action beingtaken <strong>for</strong> each of the red balanced scorecard indica<strong>to</strong>rs is provided inappendix 2.4. The Service Improvement Programme4.1 The Service Improvement Programme has been carried <strong>for</strong>ward in<strong>to</strong><strong>2009</strong>/10, as many products are not due <strong>to</strong> be complete until <strong>March</strong>2010.4.2 A Programme Review Board was held in quarter four and manyproducts were signed off by review board. Any products outstandingfrom Programme Review Board have been externally scrutinized byour Programme Assurance Advisor and a report has been producedwhich highlights improvements that can be made.22


5 Project Updates5.1 The Project Boards met three times during quarter four <strong>to</strong> discussprogress made against Audit Commission recommendations andweaknesses and <strong>to</strong> review products due <strong>for</strong> completion. In quarter four101 products were due <strong>to</strong> be complete by 31 st <strong>March</strong> <strong>2009</strong>. At the endof quarter four, 52 out of these 101 have been reported as completewithin the agreed timescales. These outstanding products have beenre-profiled and are on track <strong>to</strong> be completed during <strong>2009</strong>/10.5.2 During quarter four some workstreams have been closed due <strong>to</strong>products being completed and signed off by Programme ReviewBoard. These workstreams include the ‘Work<strong>for</strong>ce’ workstream whichsits under the Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Service Project. The ‘New S<strong>to</strong>ck’ workstream,which was part of the Refurbishing and Building Homes Project and the‘Leasehold’ workstream which reported <strong>to</strong> the Three Star ExcellentServices Project Board.5.3 There has also been some additions <strong>to</strong> the Service ImprovementProgramme during quarter four. New workstreams have been added<strong>to</strong> encompass new areas of work within the organisation which requireadditional support from workstream members <strong>to</strong> address areas of work,taken <strong>for</strong>ward in the <strong>for</strong>m of products. These workstreams include‘Inves<strong>to</strong>rs In People’ and ‘Communication with Cus<strong>to</strong>mers’. Theseworkstreams are currently being set up and new products identified <strong>to</strong>be completed during <strong>2009</strong>/10.6 Recommendations6.1 Board is asked <strong>to</strong> review the per<strong>for</strong>mance moni<strong>to</strong>ring report andapprove the actions being taken <strong>to</strong> address poor per<strong>for</strong>mance.7 Next Steps7.1 <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> will continue <strong>to</strong> be moni<strong>to</strong>red and reported on a quarterlybasis <strong>to</strong> this board, until the creation of a per<strong>for</strong>mance committee.23


Your Homes NewcastleBalanced Scorecard<strong>2008</strong> -<strong>2009</strong>01/04/08 – 31/03/09Three star excellent services1. Achieve 81% satisfaction withthe overall housing service by31/3/09.2. Achieve 70% satisfaction withopportunities <strong>for</strong> participationin management and decisionmaking by 31/3/09.3. 95% of complaints <strong>to</strong> be givena full written response within10 working days during<strong>2008</strong>/09.4. 92% of Service Plan actions <strong>to</strong>be completed within targettimescales during <strong>2008</strong>/09.5. 92% of YHN Programmeactions <strong>to</strong> be completed during<strong>2008</strong>/09.6. Reduce net rent arrears <strong>to</strong>£2,800,000 by 31/3/09.7. Achieve 3% efficiency savingon 2007/08 baseline budget by31/3/09.8. Achieve Level 3 of the revisedlocal government equalitystandard by 31/12/<strong>2008</strong>.Refurbishing and building homes1. Reduce the average voids re-let time <strong>to</strong> 50 days by 31/3/09.2. Achieve a 28.55% change in the proportion of non-decenthomes by 31/3/09.3. 5,447 homes <strong>to</strong> be made decent in <strong>2008</strong>/09.4. Develop two scheme proposals <strong>for</strong> new build housing during<strong>2008</strong>/09.5. Achieve 90% satisfaction with the investment programme by31/03/09.6. 97% of Modern Homes Programme spend <strong>to</strong> come within budgetduring <strong>2008</strong>/09.7. Achieve 91% satisfaction with the adaptations service by31/03/09.8. Achieve 92% satisfaction with the repairs and maintenanceservice by 31/3/09.Your Homes Newcastle intends <strong>to</strong> be the best housingprovider in the North East. We will achieve this by investing inour four strategic objectives:o Support and care <strong>to</strong> communitieso Three star excellent serviceso A quality work<strong>for</strong>ceo Refurbishing and building homesSupport and care <strong>to</strong> communities1. Achieve 81% BME satisfaction with the overall housing serviceby 31/3/09.2. Make a difference’ involvement volunteers <strong>to</strong> be representativeof the tenant and leaseholder population in terms of age,gender, ethnicity and disability by 31/3/09.3. 55% satisfaction with the way anti-social behaviour complaintswere dealt with by HASBET during <strong>2008</strong>/09.4. Install 1,500 child safety equipment packages by 31/03/09.5. 90% of vulnerable young people who have support fromINLINE <strong>to</strong> maintain a successful tenancy <strong>for</strong> 12 months during<strong>2008</strong>/09.6. Complete a support plan <strong>for</strong> all sheltered housing clients during<strong>2008</strong>/09.7. Achieve targets <strong>for</strong> collecting24cus<strong>to</strong>mer demographic data <strong>for</strong>ethnicity (95%), and religion and faith (40%), during <strong>2008</strong>/09.A quality work<strong>for</strong>ce1. Reduce the number ofsickness days perFTE employee <strong>to</strong>10.20 days by31/3/09.2. 4% of <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staffwho have a disability.3. 4% of <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staffwho are from anethnic minority.4. 41% of <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staffwho are women.5. Implement an actionplan by 31/03/09 <strong>to</strong>retain Inves<strong>to</strong>rs inPeople accreditation.6. Gain externalaccreditation on threein house coursesduring <strong>2008</strong>/09.7. Achieve attendance attraining courses of97% during <strong>2008</strong>/09.


Reduce the number of sickness days per FTEGood per<strong>for</strong>mance is below the targetline of 10.20 days12.5012.2312.0011.5011.42 11.4511.0010.5010.0010.6811.04YHNAverageTarget9.509.002007/0830/06/0830/09/0831/12/0831/03/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target10.20 days31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainstbenchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainsttargetFrom 31/12/08<strong>to</strong> 31/03/09direction oftravelRR25


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. To reduce the number ofsickness days per FTE <strong>to</strong> 10.20 days by 31/03/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08During 2007/8 the target of 10.20 days was notachieved. The target remains the same <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09.Direction of travelQuarter four per<strong>for</strong>mance shows the number of sicknessdays per full time employee reaching 11.45 days. Thishas not achieved the target <strong>to</strong> reduce the number ofsickness days per FTE <strong>to</strong> 10.20 days by 31/03/09.The projected number of sickness days per FTE inquarter three had reached 11.42 days, this was anincrease from quarter two and was again, moving awayfrom the target of 10.20 days.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Absence management will be the <strong>to</strong>pic of the WiderManagement Team meeting on 13 May <strong>2009</strong>. Thebarriers <strong>to</strong> attendance will be explored and strategiesdeveloped <strong>to</strong> address these barriers. A series of agreedactions will be adopted in order <strong>to</strong> expand managemen<strong>to</strong>wnership and improve per<strong>for</strong>mance. AbsenceManagement Board is currently reviewing the absencepolicy and associated procedures.Financial ImplicationsThere are costs involved in paying overtime or employingtemporary staff <strong>to</strong> cover posts. This also makes it moredifficult <strong>to</strong> quantify cost of reduced quality of service.Responsible OfficerRoss Atkinson - Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Finance and Resources26


Top 5% of staff who are womenGood per<strong>for</strong>mance is above thetarget line of 41%44.0%42.0%40.0%38.0%TotalTarget36.0%34.0%32.0%2007/0830/06/0830/09/0831/12/0831/03/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainstbenchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom31/12/08 <strong>to</strong>31/03/09direction oftravelGNot Applicable, thisis a localper<strong>for</strong>manceindica<strong>to</strong>rR27


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. 41% of the <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staffwho are women.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08At the end of 2007/08, 41% of the <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staff werewomen. This acheived the target set of 34%.Direction of travelQuarter four has seen a reduction in the number ofwomen in the <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staff. 35.7%(15) has beenachieved which has fallen short of the 41% target.Quarter four figures are based on 42 employees in the<strong>to</strong>p 5%.The target has been achieved in previous quarters.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>The per<strong>for</strong>mance against target has fallen in quarter fouras a result of two women in the <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staff leavingYHN. <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> will rise again in quarter one of<strong>2009</strong>/10 when the Head of Finance takes up post. Wewill review our approach <strong>to</strong> encourage female applicantsas and when opportunities arise in the <strong>to</strong>p 5% of staff.Financial ImplicationsThere are no financial implications if this target is notachieved.Responsible OfficerRoss Atkinson - Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Finance and Resources28


Satisfaction with Investment ProgrammeGood per<strong>for</strong>mance isabove the target line 90% satisfied100%90%89%86% 85% 87%89%80%70%60%50%40%City AverageTarget30%20%10%0%2007/0830/06/<strong>2008</strong>30/09/<strong>2008</strong>31/12/<strong>2008</strong>31/03/<strong>2009</strong><strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainsttarget31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom 31/12/08 <strong>to</strong>31/03/09direction oftravelGThis is a local<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Indica<strong>to</strong>rR29


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>rs In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. 92% of Service Plan actions <strong>to</strong>be completed within target timescales during <strong>2008</strong>/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08During 2007/8 the target of 92% of Service Plan actions wasnot achieved, the target remains the same <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09.Direction of travel168 Service Plan actions were completed in quarter four ou<strong>to</strong>f 243, this amounts <strong>to</strong> 69%. However, from <strong>April</strong> <strong>2008</strong> <strong>to</strong><strong>March</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 467 actions out of 648 have been completed in<strong>to</strong>tal, bringing the cumulative <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09 <strong>to</strong> 72%.During quarter four the Chief Executive's division haveachieved 100% with 15 service plan actions completed in theperiod. Business Development achieved 85%, TenancyServices, 65% and the Finance & Resources divisioncompleting 28 actions out of 56, which <strong>to</strong>tals 50%. The targe<strong>to</strong>f 92% of Service Plan actions <strong>to</strong> be completed within targettimescales during <strong>2008</strong>/09 has not been achieved.In quarter three, there was a <strong>to</strong>tal of 33 targets due <strong>for</strong>completion. Out of this, 22 had been completed whichamounts <strong>to</strong> 67%. From <strong>April</strong> <strong>to</strong> December <strong>2008</strong>, we hadachieved in <strong>to</strong>tal 80 targets out of 131, which gives acumulative <strong>to</strong>tal of 61%. This had not achieved the set targe<strong>to</strong>f 92%Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong><strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> will continue <strong>to</strong> be reported <strong>to</strong> each SeniorManagement Team in <strong>2009</strong>/10 who are responsible <strong>for</strong>recovery actions.Identified Service Plan targets in <strong>2009</strong>/10 will also be reported<strong>to</strong> Wider Management Team <strong>for</strong> additional scrutiny.Financial ImplicationsThere are nearly 700 service plan targets, some of which havefinancial implications.Responsible OfficerSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofBusiness32


Collecting Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Demographic DataGood per<strong>for</strong>mance isabove the target lines 95% & 40%100%90%80%70%60%74% 75% 76%80%Ethnicity50%46%Religion & Faith40%30%20%10%38% 39% 39%Ethnicity TargetReligion & FaithTarget0%30/06/<strong>2008</strong>30/09/<strong>2008</strong>31/12/<strong>2008</strong>31/03/<strong>2009</strong><strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainsttarget31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom31/12/08 <strong>to</strong>31/03/09direction oftravelNew Target <strong>for</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09This is a local<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Indica<strong>to</strong>rR33


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. Achieve targets <strong>for</strong> collectingcus<strong>to</strong>mer demographic data <strong>for</strong> ethnicity (95%) and religionand faith (40%), during <strong>2008</strong>/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08This is a new target <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09.Direction of travelIn quarter four the target <strong>for</strong> collecting cus<strong>to</strong>mer demographicdata has been achieved with regards <strong>to</strong> religion and faithwhich exceeded the 40% target with data collected <strong>for</strong> 46% ofcus<strong>to</strong>mers. The data collected <strong>for</strong> ethnicity also increased <strong>to</strong>80%, although did not reach the target of 95% of cus<strong>to</strong>mersduring <strong>2008</strong>/09.Cus<strong>to</strong>mer demographic data collected had increased slightlyin quarter three, with 76% collected relating <strong>to</strong> ethnicity, thiswas still significantly below the 95% target. Data <strong>for</strong> Religionand Faith remained the same with 39%.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Data collection exercise has been carried out betweenDecember <strong>2008</strong> and <strong>March</strong> <strong>2009</strong>. Staff worked out of hours<strong>to</strong> contact cus<strong>to</strong>mers who have not responded <strong>to</strong> previousattempts <strong>to</strong> collect demographic data.At the end of quarter four, 6830 visits <strong>to</strong> tenants have beenmade. Data collected has been input in<strong>to</strong> the Northgatesystem. This will allow us <strong>to</strong> deliver appropriate services <strong>to</strong>meet the needs of the cus<strong>to</strong>mer.Briefing sessions <strong>to</strong> be carried out with Community HousingOffice staff regarding the 'getting <strong>to</strong> know our cus<strong>to</strong>mer'procedure <strong>to</strong> ensure accurate data is collected.Financial ImplicationsNot having this in<strong>for</strong>mation may result in resources not beingcorrectly targeted.Responsible OfficerSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofBusiness34


Making a Difference VolunteersGood per<strong>for</strong>mance isabove the target lines 40.95% &34.45%45.00%40.00%35.00%36.30% 36.10%37.05%30.00%25.00%20.00%19.60%21.37%20.92%Male25-4415.00%Male Target10.00%5.00%25-44 Target0.00%30/06/<strong>2008</strong>30/09/<strong>2008</strong>31/12/<strong>2008</strong>31/03/<strong>2009</strong><strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainsttarget31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom 31/12/08 <strong>to</strong>31/03/09direction oftravelNew Target <strong>for</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09This is a local<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Indica<strong>to</strong>rR35


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. Make a difference involvementvolunteers <strong>to</strong> be representative of the tenant and leaseholderpopulation in terms of age, gender, ethnicity and disability by31/03/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08This is a new target <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09.Direction of travelThe Male 'Making a Difference Volunteers' have increased <strong>to</strong>37.05 in quarter four, which has hit the <strong>to</strong>lerance and isthere<strong>for</strong>e representative of the tenant and leaseholderpopulation.The aged 25-44 group of volunteers has increased again sincequarter three and is currently at 20.92 % but has not achievedthe target of 34.45% which reflects the current tenant andleaseholder population.It is important <strong>to</strong> note that the target is constantly changing due<strong>to</strong> the natural fluctuation in population.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>This was a new target <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09 and there<strong>for</strong>e the first timethe 'Making a difference volunteers' have been moni<strong>to</strong>red inthis way. This target is being taken <strong>for</strong>ward as part of theservice plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>2009</strong>/10.The moni<strong>to</strong>ring of this target has identifed areas within the'Making a Difference volunteers' that had not yet beenidentified. The age 25-44 group has been identified as hard <strong>to</strong>hear. A promotional campaign will target tenants in this agegroup <strong>to</strong> raise awareness of involvement methods.Financial ImplicationsNot achieving this target would require a dedicated resource <strong>to</strong>carry out further work <strong>to</strong> ensure volunteers were representative.Responsible OfficerSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofBusiness36


Level 3 Local Government Equality StandardGood per<strong>for</strong>mance is above thetarget line of Level 33.503.002.752.952.502.50 2.502.001.501.000.500.002.00LevelTarget2007/0830/06/0830/09/0831/12/0831/03/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainstbenchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainsttargetFrom 31/12/08<strong>to</strong> 31/03/09direction oftravelNew Target <strong>for</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09This is a local<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Indica<strong>to</strong>rR37


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target. Achieve Level 3 of therevised local government equality standard by31/12/<strong>2008</strong>.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08This is a new target <strong>for</strong> <strong>2008</strong>/09.Direction of travelIn quarter four, again progress has been made <strong>to</strong>wardsachieveing Level 3 of the local government equalitystandard and a peer assessment has been undertaken.However, a <strong>for</strong>mal assessment has not been undertakenand the target <strong>to</strong> achieve Level 3 by 31/12/<strong>2008</strong> has notbeen met.In quarter three, some progress had been made <strong>to</strong>achieving the target, although it had not been achievedby the set deadline of 31/12/<strong>2008</strong>.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Peer Assessment has take place with GatesheadHousing Company. Review broadly supports ourapproach with some minor amendments in the areas ofprocurement, per<strong>for</strong>mance and involvement.Actions <strong>to</strong> address improvements identified byGateshead <strong>to</strong> be undertaken whilst working on an actionplan <strong>to</strong> migrate <strong>to</strong> the new Equality Standard <strong>for</strong> LocalGovernment.Financial ImplicationsExternal Assessment may incur financial costs. To bedetermined.Responsible OfficerSimone Doyle - Diversity Manager38


Tenant Satisfaction with opportunities <strong>for</strong> participation inmanagement and decision making72.00%Good per<strong>for</strong>mance is above the targetline of 70%70.00%68.00%67.08%66.00%64.00%62.00%63.00%63.80%City Average60.00%Target58.00%58.38%56.00%54.00%52.00%2005/062006/072007/08<strong>2008</strong>/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom 2007/08 <strong>to</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09direction oftravelRR39


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target - Achieve 70% satisfaction withopportunities <strong>for</strong> participation in management and decisionmaking by 31/03/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08During 2007/08 the target was not achieved with 63.80% oftenants satisfied with opportunities <strong>for</strong> participation inmanagement and decision making.Direction of travelThis indica<strong>to</strong>r is calculated from an annual tenant satisfactionsurvey using the STATUS methodology. In <strong>2008</strong>/09 58.38%of tenants were satisfied with opportunities <strong>for</strong> participation inmanagement and decision making. This is below the target of70% and has shown a reduction in satisfaction compared <strong>to</strong>2007/08. However, tenants who indicated levels ofdissatisfaction remain low at 6.26%.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Detailed analysis of the STATUS Survey has beenundertaken and a report produced <strong>for</strong> YHN ManagementTeam. The report highlighted the biggest decrease insatisfaction related <strong>to</strong> how good tenants felt that their landlordwas in keeping them in<strong>for</strong>med of things that might affect themas tenants.The area tenants were most dissatisfied with was withcommunications and involvement and their satisfaction withthe final outcome following contact being made with theirlandlord about an issue.In oder <strong>to</strong> address these issues, a workstream has beenin<strong>to</strong>roduced in<strong>to</strong> the Service Improvement Programme <strong>to</strong> lookat Comunications and Involvement <strong>for</strong> tenants andleaseholders and <strong>to</strong> fully investigate opportunities of how <strong>to</strong>improve outcomes <strong>for</strong> tenants following the reporting of aproblem or issue.Financial ImplicationsNot applicableResponsible OfficersSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r of40


Tenant Satisfaction with the overall housing service82.00%Good per<strong>for</strong>mance is above the targetline of 81%80.00%78.00%78.00%76.00%74.00%74.00%74.39%73.05%City AverageTarget72.00%70.00%68.00%2005/062006/072007/08<strong>2008</strong>/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom 2007/08 <strong>to</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09direction oftravelGR41


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationNational Indica<strong>to</strong>r NI160. Balanced Scorecard target. Achieve81% satisfaction with the overall housing service by 31/03/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08During 2007/08 the target was achieved as 78.0% of tenantswere satisfied with the overall housing service.Direction of travelThis indica<strong>to</strong>r is calculated from an annual tenant satisfactionsurvey using the STATUS methodology. In <strong>2008</strong>/09 73.05% oftenants were satisfied with the overall housing service. This isbelow the target of 81% and has shown a reduction insatisfaction compared <strong>to</strong> 2007/08.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Detailed analysis of the STATUS survey has been undertakenand a report produced <strong>for</strong> YHN Management Team. The reportshowed an overall decrease in satisfaction compared <strong>to</strong>2007/08.A workstream has been set up as part of the YHN ServiceImprovement Programme <strong>to</strong> specifically look at the overalldecline in satisfaction and in particular <strong>to</strong> look at STATUS andidentify a process <strong>to</strong> improve satisfaction in future years.Financial ImplicationsNot applicableResponsible OfficersSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofBusinessNeil Scott - Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Tenancy Services42


BME Satisfaction with the overall housing serviceGood per<strong>for</strong>mance is above the targetline of 81%90.00%80.00%78.40%70.00%64.05%71.05%67.84%60.00%50.00%City Average40.00%30.00%Target20.00%10.00%0.00%2005/062006/072007/08<strong>2008</strong>/09<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Comparisons2007/08per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst target31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst benchmark(ALMO's)31/03/09per<strong>for</strong>manceagainst targetFrom 2007/08 <strong>to</strong><strong>2008</strong>/09direction oftravelGR43


<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> Indica<strong>to</strong>r In<strong>for</strong>mationBalanced Scorecard Target - Achieve 81% BME satisfactionwith the overall housing service by 31/03/09.<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2007/08During 2007/08 the target was achieved as 78.4% of BMEtenants were satisfied with the overall housing service.Direction of travelThis indica<strong>to</strong>r is calculated from an annual tenant satisfactionsurvey using the STATUS methodology. In <strong>2008</strong>/09 67.84%of BME tenants were satisfied with the overall housing service.This is below the target of 81%.Corrective Action Taken <strong>to</strong> Improve <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong>Detailed analysis of the STATUS survey has been undertakenand a report produced <strong>for</strong> YHN Management Team. Thereport showed an overall decrease in satisfaction compared <strong>to</strong>2007/08.A workstream has been set up as part of the YHN ServiceImprovement Programme <strong>to</strong> specifically look at the overalldecline in satisfaction and in particular <strong>to</strong> look at STATUS andidentify a process <strong>to</strong> improve satisfaction in future years.Financial ImplicationsNot applicableResponsible OfficerSheila Breslin - Assistant Chief Executive and Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofBusinessNeil Scott - Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Tenancy Services44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!