13.07.2015 Views

Offering Hope in a Hopeless Situation (Peter Bjerkerot, BSN, OCN)

Offering Hope in a Hopeless Situation (Peter Bjerkerot, BSN, OCN)

Offering Hope in a Hopeless Situation (Peter Bjerkerot, BSN, OCN)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Offer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Hope</strong> <strong>in</strong> aHelpless <strong>Situation</strong>:Deliver<strong>in</strong>g Bad News<strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Bjerkerot</strong> RN, <strong>OCN</strong>1339 Normandy DriveAtlanta, GA 30306-2574404.754.5952WebPage http://boyrn.competer.bjerkerot@m<strong>in</strong>dspr<strong>in</strong>g.com


Full Disclosure Statement‣ Celgene‣ Nurse Advisory Boards (Breast)‣ Nurse Speaker’s Bureau‣ Pfizer Oncology‣ Nurse Advisory Boards (Colorectal & Breast)‣ Nurse Speaker’s Bureau‣ ProStrakan‣ Speaker’s Bureau


Francis (Francie) Jones“What happens <strong>in</strong> a hospital (or whensomeone is sick) will happen if you are thereor not.If you can make the experience just a littlebetter—that’s what it is all about.”--Personal conversation at lunch 1978


Imogene K<strong>in</strong>g‣ Human be<strong>in</strong>gs are open systems <strong>in</strong> constant<strong>in</strong>teraction with the environment‣ Personal System‣ Individual; perception, self, growth, development,time space, body image‣ Interpersonal‣ Socialization; <strong>in</strong>teraction, communication/transaction‣ Society‣ Family, religious groups, schools, work, peers


Imogene K<strong>in</strong>g‣ The nurse and patient mutuallycommunicate, establish goals and takeaction to atta<strong>in</strong> goals‣ Each <strong>in</strong>dividual br<strong>in</strong>gs a different set ofvalues, ideas, attitudes, perceptions toexchangeTaylor Carol ,Lillis Carol (2001)The Art and Science Of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Care 4th ed.Philadelphia, Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott


Imogene K<strong>in</strong>g‣ If role expectations and role performance asperceived by nurse-client are congruent, transactionwill occur‣ If role conflict is experienced by nurse or client orboth, stress <strong>in</strong> nurse-client <strong>in</strong>teraction will occur‣ If nurse with special knowledge skill communicateappropriate <strong>in</strong>formation to client, mutual goal sett<strong>in</strong>gand goal atta<strong>in</strong>ment will occur.Taylor Carol ,Lillis Carol (2001)The Art and Science Of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Care 4th ed.Philadelphia, Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott


Evelyn Phylaw Polk“You have been and RN for 5 years now—youMUST be a resource for your colleagues,patients and family at every opportunity”Personal conversation, 1989“It is your professional responsibility to be amentor and to share your experience, strength,knowledge and hope with all of yourcolleagues.”Personal conversation, 2001


HOPE<strong>Hope</strong> is a stateof heart…


What is HOPE?‣ …complex and multidimensional‣ …chang<strong>in</strong>g and redef<strong>in</strong>ed by patients overtime‣ …found to <strong>in</strong>fluence positive adjustment <strong>in</strong>patients with cancer‣ …cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be a focus of (ONS) research.‣ Although many nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventional studieshave been done, much more is needed


<strong>Hope</strong> vs. Helplessness‣ <strong>Hope</strong>: A pleasurable feel<strong>in</strong>g associated withyour belief that someth<strong>in</strong>g you want mighthappen‣ Prerequisite for hope is uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty‣ Helplessness: An unpleasant feel<strong>in</strong>g thatoutcomes are out of your control‣ Locus of control is completely external‣ Leads to decreased QOL and lower self esteem,anxiety and depression


Good News vs. Accurate News‣ Hop<strong>in</strong>g for “Good News”may lead to unachievableexpectations‣ Hop<strong>in</strong>g for “AccurateNews” may help expla<strong>in</strong>why he/she feels sick, orcorrectly reflect thepatient’s conditionHarpham, Wendy; Oncology Times 9/25/2011‣ Patients who hope foraccurate news may bemore apt to notice andreport changes and other<strong>in</strong>formation compared tothose who hope for goodnews.‣ Sets the stage for patientsto perceive “bad news”as “helpful news”.


Heal<strong>in</strong>g Power of <strong>Hope</strong>‣ We have aprofessional obligationto rema<strong>in</strong> objective‣ <strong>Hope</strong> for accuratenews prevents youremotions fromcloud<strong>in</strong>g yourjudgment‣ “Work<strong>in</strong>g together we canobta<strong>in</strong> the best <strong>in</strong>formationabout your condition. Thebest <strong>in</strong>formation helps usmake the best decisionsabout your care…hop<strong>in</strong>gfor accurate news now<strong>in</strong>creases our chance forgood news down the l<strong>in</strong>e”Harpham, Wendy; Oncology Times 9/25/2011


Osler’s Mandate“Relieve as often as possible andcomfort always”Osler, William; The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and practice of medic<strong>in</strong>e, 1892


BurnoutCommunication of Bad/DifficultNews is a Lead<strong>in</strong>g Source ofCl<strong>in</strong>ician BurnoutRamirez AJ, et al. Burnout and psychiatricdisorder among cancer cl<strong>in</strong>icians. Br JCancer June 1995;71:1263-1269Graham J, et al. Stress and burnout <strong>in</strong>doctors. Lancet 2002;360:1975-1976


Stress Associated withBad/Difficult News‣ In a large survey of oncologists, 20% reportedanxiety and strong emotions when they had to tella patient that his/her condition would lead todeath.‣ In a more detailed study of 73 physicians,31(42%) <strong>in</strong>dicated that, while the stress oftenpeaks dur<strong>in</strong>g the encounter, the stress from a badnews encounter can last for hours to 3 or moredays afterwards.Department of Medic<strong>in</strong>e and Department of Health Services University of Wash<strong>in</strong>gton School ofMedic<strong>in</strong>e Seattle, WA 98195


Stress experienced by physician andpatient <strong>in</strong> the discussion of bad newsNurse enters room


Patient Responses toBad/Difficult News‣ In a study of patients who were diagnosed ashav<strong>in</strong>g cancer, the most frequent responseswere:‣ shock (54%)‣ fright (46%)‣ acceptance (40%)‣ sadness (24%)‣ and “not worried” (15%)West J Med. 2002 May; 176(3): 177–180.


Manag<strong>in</strong>g Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty‣ Cannot actually manage uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, only the patient’sreaction to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty.‣ Shift locus of control to patient and away from the event(outcome)‣ Reasons for uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty:‣ Lack of complete <strong>in</strong>formation‣ Statistical probability (Problematic)‣ Compassion stems from understand<strong>in</strong>g how a patient’sreaction to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty impact their decisions and QOL.


Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty MatrixUncerta<strong>in</strong>tydue to Lack ofKnowledgeProblematicUncerta<strong>in</strong>ty(Statistical probability)DecisionMak<strong>in</strong>g andQuality OfLifeCourage to ActSerenity to Wait…Grant me the SERENITY to accept the th<strong>in</strong>g Icannot change,The COURAGE to change the th<strong>in</strong>gs I can,And the WISDOM to know the difference.--Niebuhr--


Putt<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to action:Courage to Act‣ Scans, Labs, Consults‣ Other Treatment Options‣ Available Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Trial‣ F<strong>in</strong>ancial Counsel<strong>in</strong>g‣ Monitored Websites“Let’s see what other steps wecan take to stack the cards <strong>in</strong>your favor”Serenity to Wait‣ HONEST reassurance that asa team (patient, family,healthcare team) we havemade the best decision‣ Help patient to channelnegative feel<strong>in</strong>gs (despair,anxiety, lonel<strong>in</strong>ess, anger,etc.) <strong>in</strong>to positive actions‣ Support groups, bibliotherapy,psychotherapy, DignityTherapy, end of life work


Communicat<strong>in</strong>g DifficultInformation‣ Not Much Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> This Area‣ Aspects most valued by patients and families:‣ Feel Guided‣ Build Trust‣ Support <strong>Hope</strong>‣ Physicians and Nurses Typically Miss theFull Range of Patient Concerns**NCI Grant # R25 92055


6-Step Approach for Deliver<strong>in</strong>gBad News‣ Prepare‣ Assess Patient Understand<strong>in</strong>g‣ Determ<strong>in</strong>e What the Patient Wants to Know‣ Share Information‣ Acknowledge Patient’s Reaction‣ Plan Follow-ThroughBuckman, R. How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press: 1992


6-Step Approach for Deliver<strong>in</strong>gBad News‣ Prepare‣ Face to Face better than over the phone‣ F<strong>in</strong>d a private place‣ Turn off Pagers and cell phones‣ Assess Patient Understand<strong>in</strong>g‣ Goal is to establish the accuracy of the patient’s currentunderstand<strong>in</strong>g and discover if there are emotional issuesthat need to be addressed‣ Determ<strong>in</strong>e What the Patient Wants to Know‣ Ask the question directlyBuckman, R. How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press: 1992


6-Step Approach for Deliver<strong>in</strong>gBad News‣ Share Information‣ Do not use medical jargon‣ Give <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> small, digestible pieces‣ Diagnosis, Treatment Plan, Prognosis, Support‣ Acknowledge Patient’s Reaction‣ Requires concentration and sensibility‣ Acceptance rarely occurs <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>terview‣ Plan Follow-Through‣ Blend <strong>in</strong>formation with issues raised <strong>in</strong> the first 5 stepsBuckman, R. How to break bad news: A guide for health care professionals. Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press: 1992


Th<strong>in</strong>gs to Avoid‣ Block<strong>in</strong>g‣ Failure to Respond or Redirect Issue Raised‣ Lectur<strong>in</strong>g‣ Deliver<strong>in</strong>g a Lot of Information Without Giv<strong>in</strong>g thePatient/Family an Opportunity to Ask Questions‣ Collusion‣ “Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell‣ Premature Reassurance‣ Respond to Patient Concerns with Reassurance WithoutExplor<strong>in</strong>g the Issues Beh<strong>in</strong>d the ConcernCA Cancer J Cl<strong>in</strong> 2005;55:164-177


Fundamental CommunicationSkills: Th<strong>in</strong>gs to Cultivate‣ 1. Ask-tell-ask‣ 2. Tell me more‣ 3. Respond to emotions with NURSEN = Nam<strong>in</strong>gU = Understand<strong>in</strong>gR = Respect<strong>in</strong>gS = Support<strong>in</strong>gE = Explor<strong>in</strong>gCA Cancer J Cl<strong>in</strong> 2005;55:164-177


Smith RC. Patient-centered <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g: an evidencedbasedmethod. Philadelphia: Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams&Wilk<strong>in</strong>s;2002.NURSE-”It’s all <strong>in</strong> the name”‣ N = Nam<strong>in</strong>g‣ Name the emotion‣ “It sounds like you are worried about children’s reaction to yourchemotherapy”‣ U = Understand<strong>in</strong>g‣ Sensitive Appreciation of Patient’s Predicament or Feel<strong>in</strong>gs‣ Avoid Pre-mature Reassurance (HUGE Temptation)‣ Make Sure You Understand (explor<strong>in</strong>g/active listen<strong>in</strong>g/silence)


NURSE-”It’s all <strong>in</strong> the name”‣ N = Nam<strong>in</strong>g‣ U = Understand<strong>in</strong>g‣ R = Respect<strong>in</strong>gSmith RC. Patient-centered <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g:an evidenced-based method. Philadelphia:Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams &Wilk<strong>in</strong>s;2002.‣ Can be Non-Verbal (SOLER Listen<strong>in</strong>g)/SIT Down‣ Acknowledge emotion (Try to match your acknowledgement with the<strong>in</strong>tensity of patient’s expression of emotion)‣ S = Support<strong>in</strong>g‣ Express Concern, State your Understand<strong>in</strong>g, Offer Help‣ Acknowledge Patient’s Efforts to Cope‣ E = Explor<strong>in</strong>g‣ Ask Additional Focused Questions or Express an Interest <strong>in</strong>Someth<strong>in</strong>g the Patient Said Earlier


SOLER Listen<strong>in</strong>g‣ S= Square shoulders‣ O= Open arms‣ L= Lean forward‣ E= Eye contact‣ R= Relaxed breath<strong>in</strong>g


S-I-T Down‣S=Select a seat at same level as patient‣I=Invite conversation‣T=Touch/Talk/Tone


OUR Issues with DifficultDiscussions‣ Professional norms‣ Time limitations for staff‣ Power differences between provider and patient‣ Staff members’ own culture, experience,personality‣ Patient anger directed at medical team‣ Staff members’ own emotions‣ Triangulation of patient-nurse-physicianSheldon, Barrett, Ell<strong>in</strong>gton, 2006


A Little DiversionTime for a pop-quiz!


OUR Humanism‣ You are human—car<strong>in</strong>g and compassionate‣ It is a hard message to give‣ You have cancer, you are dy<strong>in</strong>g, someth<strong>in</strong>g bad has happened‣ Your own “stuff”‣ Tired, busy, over-extended, home/life issues‣ Transference‣ What if this was me—my family member‣ Multiple Loss Syndrome


Experienced DifferentlyHealthcare Provider‣ Multiple “deliveries”‣ Professional boundaries‣ Medical expertise‣ Fluent <strong>in</strong> the language‣ One member of a team‣ Balanc<strong>in</strong>g a caseloadPatient‣ 1 st time “hear<strong>in</strong>g” the news‣ Emotional affirmations (+/-)‣ Layperson knowledge‣ Foreign language‣ Me, myself, I‣ “I trust you, I need you”Burnett, Laurel and Ca<strong>in</strong>, Victoria, 3 rd Annual SW Regional Oncology Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Symposium 8/13/2011


Morgan, RL. Calm<strong>in</strong>g upset Customers: Stay<strong>in</strong>g Calm Dur<strong>in</strong>g Unpleasant <strong>Situation</strong>s, MelanoPark CA: Crisp Publications; 1996: pp 10-61Reasons Patients Get Upset‣ News delivered is differentthan what they expected‣ Expectations not be<strong>in</strong>g met‣ Patient was already upset atsomeone or someth<strong>in</strong>g‣ Patient is tired, stressed, notfeel<strong>in</strong>g well‣ Someone <strong>in</strong> your <strong>in</strong>stitutionwas rude, <strong>in</strong>different,discourteous‣ Information given by theMD and RN is different‣ Long wait to be seen‣ Cost issues‣ Feel if he/she is loud, his/herneeds will be addressed‣ Patient’s <strong>in</strong>tegrity or honestyis questioned‣ Patient does not feel thatthey are be<strong>in</strong>g takenseriously


What the Upset Patient Wants‣ To be taken seriously‣ To be treated withrespect‣ To feel important‣ Immediate action‣ Some form ofrestitution‣ Someone to bereprimanded‣ To clear up theproblem so it will nothappen aga<strong>in</strong>‣ To be listened to‣ A truthful answerMorgan, RL. Calm<strong>in</strong>g upset Customers: Stay<strong>in</strong>g Calm Dur<strong>in</strong>g Unpleasant <strong>Situation</strong>s, MelanoPark CA: Crisp Publications; 1996: pp 10-61


Mov<strong>in</strong>g toward heal<strong>in</strong>g‣ ACCEPTANCE‣ Incorporate the event <strong>in</strong>to one's world image and move on‣ The goal of all grief work‣ Acceptance DOES NOT EQUAL Approval/Agreement‣ Rituals‣ Used to help move to a place of <strong>in</strong>tegration of loss‣ Can “fast track” process to acceptance‣ Focuses M<strong>in</strong>dful Awareness‣ Takes many forms‣ Need to f<strong>in</strong>d one that will work for you and/or yourcolleagues (There is not cookie cutter approach)


Use of Ritual <strong>in</strong> Multiple LossWork (3 Phases)‣ Separation – the <strong>in</strong>tentional leav<strong>in</strong>g of aconnection to mean<strong>in</strong>g‣ Transition – the old reality is no longerpresent; the new reality is not yet known‣ Incorporation – when enough of atransformation has occurred to lead to a newsense of self and a new reality


Dignity Therapy (DT)‣ Substantial Benefits over Palliative Care(PC) and Client Centered Care (CCC)‣ Concept:‣ 326 Term<strong>in</strong>ally Ill Patients‣ Canada, USA, Australia‣ Randomly Assigned to One of Three Arms‣ DT=108 – PC=111 – CCC=107Lancet Oncology 2011; 12:753-762


Dignity Therapy (DT)‣ Allow Patients Near<strong>in</strong>g Death to Discussand Document Th<strong>in</strong>gs They Want to beKnown or Remembered For‣ Edited and Transcribed and Given to Patient‣ Patient Can Share or Bequeath toIndividuals of Their ChoiceLancet Oncology 2011; 12:753-762


Dignity Therapy‣ Outcome= Significantly (Statistically) Improved‣ Quality of Life‣ Enhanced Sense of Dignity‣ Changed How Family Saw and Appreciated Patient‣ Provided Benefit to Relatives‣ Data Regard<strong>in</strong>g Mitigat<strong>in</strong>g Outright Distress NotYet Proven Includ<strong>in</strong>g:‣ Depression, Desire for Death, or SuicidalityLancet Oncology 2011; 12:753-762


What I’ve Heard Patients Say ToMe About My ColleaguesAll I know isthat shewas therewith me


Ulla <strong>Bjerkerot</strong>“It’s not what happens to a person thatis important……it is what a person does with whathappens that matters”Personal conversation—My entire life


<strong>Peter</strong> <strong>Bjerkerot</strong> RN, <strong>OCN</strong>1339 Normandy DriveAtlanta, GA 30306-2574404.754.5952WebPage http://boyrn.competer.bjerkerot@m<strong>in</strong>dspr<strong>in</strong>g.comThank youAny Questions???

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!