13.07.2015 Views

Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...

Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...

Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 The Estimated <strong>School</strong> EffectsOne motivation for the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the school fixed effects is to control, inter alia, forschooling quality in terms <strong>of</strong> its potential effect on education returns <strong>and</strong> on earningsmore generally. Their inclusion is also motivated by a sense that they might alsocapture labour market network effects. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> the school controls tends toreduce both the return to senior secondary schooling <strong>and</strong> to a university qualificationbut induces a sharper reduction in the former relative to the latter. 32 This is a relativelyintuitive result <strong>and</strong> highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> controlling for schooling quality incomputing rates <strong>of</strong> return to schooling qualifications. It is apparent that parentaleducational background is more important to the estimated university returns thansecondary schooling quality.The school effects can be interrogated more thoroughly by normalizing the tenestimated school effects as a deviation from an overall school weighted averageeffect. This transformation has intuitive appeal in that the estimated earningsdifferences are now relative to an overall average rather than an arbitrary base group<strong>and</strong> are thus more easily interpretable. This approach follows the approach adoptedby Krueger <strong>and</strong> Summers (1988) in the literature on inter-industry wage differentials.If we define the school effect from the interval regression model for the k th school asγ k the deviation is expressed as:10γ k – j=1π j γ j [8]where π j is the proportion <strong>of</strong> the sample in the j th school. The corresponding samplingvariances are computed as per Zanchi (1998). 33 Table 6 reports the estimateddeviations for the ten schools for both wage employees <strong>and</strong> the self-employed.[Table 6]32 In Table 4 the estimated coefficient for the senior secondary qualification reduced by one-quarterwith the inclusion <strong>of</strong> school fixed effects, while the comparable estimate for the university qualificationreduces by just under one-tenth.33 See also Haisken-DeNew <strong>and</strong> Schmidt (1997) for a more detailed discussion.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!