Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...
Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...
Education, Employment and Earnings of Secondary School-Leavers ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sample <strong>of</strong> 50 completers from each <strong>of</strong> the two years were r<strong>and</strong>omly selected fromeach school to comprise a total <strong>of</strong> 1000 junior secondary school completers.Once initial lists <strong>of</strong> sampled students were collated, research teams attempted to traceeach individual’s current location. Tracing selected individuals began at the schools,where staff members <strong>and</strong> school records provided some information. The researchteams then interviewed <strong>and</strong> completed questionnaires on all sampled respondentsliving in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the schools. In addition to interviewing these respondents theresearch teams asked about the current whereabouts <strong>of</strong> sampled classmates, where theschool was unable to provide sufficiently accurate information to locate them. Theresearch teams also interviewed parents <strong>and</strong> other household members <strong>of</strong> sampledstudents who were living elsewhere, to obtain information on their current location aswell as to collect basic information on the individual in question. Asking familymembers <strong>and</strong> classmates about the location <strong>of</strong> sampled students proved to be anextremely productive tracing technique. Once the research teams completed the workin the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the sampled schools, researchers were sent to interview respondentsin other cities <strong>and</strong> locations with high concentrations <strong>of</strong> traced completers. In caseswhere traced respondents lived in remote areas a questionnaire was sent to them forcompletion. 11Table 3 shows the tracer survey response rate to be extremely high, with 97 per cent<strong>of</strong> respondents being traced <strong>and</strong> their information collected. This compares favourablywith other tracer surveys conducted in developing countries (see for example, Bennell<strong>and</strong> Ncube (1993, 1994), Kaijage (2000), Narman (1992), Mayanja <strong>and</strong> Nakayiwa(1997)) <strong>and</strong> suggests that sample selection problems may be considerably reduced inour case. The main source <strong>of</strong> the information collected was the traced respondent, <strong>and</strong>in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases this was through ‘face-to-face’ interviews. In 50 cases basicinformation on the respondents was collected from the individual’s parents.A questionnaire was completed for each respondent <strong>and</strong> was designed to elicitinformation on personal background, further education, training <strong>and</strong> employment11 This was rarely done through the postal service but through intermediaries living near the sampledindividual.9