13.07.2015 Views

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Stat</strong>istical Significance TestingThe Insignificance of <strong>Stat</strong>isticalSignificance TestingWhat is <strong>Stat</strong>istical Hypothesis Testing?Four basic steps constitute statistical hypothesis testing. First, one develops a null hypothesis about somephenomenon or parameter. This null hypothesis is generally the opposite of the research hypothesis,which is what the investigator truly believes <strong>and</strong> wants to demonstrate. Research hypotheses may begenerated either inductively, from a study of observations already made, or deductively, deriving fromtheory. Next, data are collected that bear on the issue, typically by an experiment or by sampling. (Nullhypotheses often are developed after the data are in h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> have been rummaged through, but that'sanother topic.) A statistical test of the null hypothesis then is conducted, which generates a P-value.Finally, the question of what that value means relative to the null hypothesis is considered. Severalinterpretations of P often are made.Sometimes P is viewed as the probability that the results obtained were due to chance. Small values aretaken to indicate that the results were not just a happenstance. A large value of P, say for a test that µ = 0,would suggest that the mean actually recorded was due to chance, <strong>and</strong> µ could be assumed to be zero(Schmidt <strong>and</strong> Hunter 1997).Other times, 1-P is considered the reliability of the result, that is, the probability of getting the sameresult if the experiment were repeated. Significant differences are often termed "reliable" under thisinterpretation.Alternatively, P can be treated as the probability that the null hypothesis is true. This interpretation is themost direct one, as it addresses head-on the question that interests the investigator.These 3 interpretations are what Carver (1978) termed fantasies about statistical significance. None ofthem is true, although they are treated as if they were true in some statistical textbooks <strong>and</strong> applicationspapers. Small values of P are taken to represent strong evidence that the null hypothesis is false, butworkers demonstrated long ago (see references in Berger <strong>and</strong> Sellke 1987) that such is not the case. Infact, Berger <strong>and</strong> Sellke (1987) gave an example for which a P-value of 0.05 was attained with a sample65http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/1999/statsig/stathyp.htm (1 of 7) [12/6/2002 3:10:59 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!