13.07.2015 Views

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

Stat-403/Stat-650 : Intermediate Sampling and Experimental Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Stat</strong>istical Signigicance TestingThe Insignificance of <strong>Stat</strong>isticalSignificance TestingBy Douglas H. Johnson 1Abstract: Despite their wide use in scientific journals such as The Journal of Wildlife Management, statisticalhypothesis tests add very little value to the products of research. Indeed, they frequently confuse theinterpretation of data. This paper describes how statistical hypothesis tests are often viewed, <strong>and</strong> then contraststhat interpretation with the correct one. I discuss the arbitrariness of P-values, conclusions that the nullhypothesis is true, power analysis, <strong>and</strong> distinctions between statistical <strong>and</strong> biological significance. <strong>Stat</strong>isticalhypothesis testing, in which the null hypothesis about the properties of a population is almost always known apriori to be false, is contrasted with scientific hypothesis testing, which examines a credible null hypothesisabout phenomena in nature. More meaningful alternatives are briefly outlined, including estimation <strong>and</strong>confidence intervals for determining the importance of factors, decision theory for guiding actions in the faceof uncertainty, <strong>and</strong> Bayesian approaches to hypothesis testing <strong>and</strong> other statistical practices.Key words: Bayesian approaches, confidence interval, null hypothesis, P-value, power analysis, scientifichypothesis test, statistical hypothesis test.This resource is based on the following source (Northern Prairie Publication 1057):Johnson, Douglas H. 1999. The Insignificance of <strong>Stat</strong>istical SignificanceTesting. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(3):763-772.This resource should be cited as:Johnson, Douglas H. 1999. The Insignificance of <strong>Stat</strong>istical SignificanceTesting. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(3):763-772. Jamestown,ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page.http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/1999/statsig/statsig.htm(Version 16SEP99).Editor's Note: Doug Johnson received The Wildlife Society Award for Outst<strong>and</strong>ing Publication in Wildlife61http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/1999/statsig/statsig.htm (1 of 3) [12/6/2002 3:10:51 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!