Financial Stability Report No1 20 December 2010 - Banka Qendrore ...
Financial Stability Report No1 20 December 2010 - Banka Qendrore ... Financial Stability Report No1 20 December 2010 - Banka Qendrore ...
Number 1Financial Stability ReportFindings from BEEPS indicate thatfirms in Kosovo in 2009 did notperceive access to finance as animpediment to their businessoperation and growth. Adversely, theindicators that point to the level ofaccess to finance in Kosovo resultlower compared with other countriesin the region. Among the firmssurveyed in Kosovo, only 15 percenthave declared to have received loansfrom financial institutions, while theaverage for other countries in theregion for this indicator was 58.8percent (Figure 73). This indicatesFigure 73. The percentage of firms receivingloans from financial institutions80706050403020100Burimi: www.enterprisesurvey.orgthat firms in Kosovo rely more on internal funds, while bank financing remains at lowlevels in 2009 as well.The low level of funding from financial institutions in Kosovo was also reflected in the'Financial Access Survey' of the IMF.Figure 74. The number of borrowers fromAccording to this survey, the numbercommercial banks in 1000 adultsof borrowers in commercial banks in900.01000 adult residents in Kosovo was 800.0700.0only about 100 (Figure 74). In region,600.0500.0Serbia and Montenegro had the400.0highest number of borrowers in 1000adult inhabitants (about 171.6 and300.0200.0100.0217.8 borrowers per 10000.0inhabitants). Most of the countries inthe region had no available data forthis indicator. With about 132.22008 2009borrowers per 1000 adult residents,Kosovo has the lowest number ofSource: Financial access survey, IMFborrowers from commercial banks, leaving behind only Albania with 99.6.That firms in Kosovo face higher financing constrained relative to countries in the region isalso reflected through the low rate of private sector lending as a share to GDP indicator. In2009, private sector lending rate as a share to GDP in Kosovo was around 32.9 percent,while the regional average for this indicator in the same period was around 52.7 percent.Montenegro reported the highest private sector lending rate (77.7 percent of GDP) followedby Croatia (66.5 percent of GDP). Apart from Kosovo, Albania reported the lowest rate ofprivate sector lending (36.6 per cent of GDP).The literature on access to finance suggests that regardless of size or ownership, firms tendto turn to external funds only after the internal funds have been used completely. This isdue to a number of reasons, including monitoring and transaction costs for obtaining bankloans such as the applications costs, screening costs, bankruptcy costs, etc. (Hashi and Toçi,2010). However, using internal funds rather than bank financing has been considered toadversely affect business growth and development, regardless of firm size (Chavis et al.2010). This, to some extent, may be because when a firm is funded by a bank, the bank's94 |
Financial Stability ReportNumber 1role consists also in monitoring the spending of borrowed funds as well as monitoring themanagement and the overall performance of the firm, thereby contributing to the efficiencyof the firm.Small firms are considered to rely more on internal financing rather than bank financing,therefore are more financially constrained when accessing bank finance. Small firms areconsidered to carry higher credit risk level mainly due to lack of information about thecompany's previous activities and credit history, which increases the financial institutionsuncertainty to finance them. Consistent with the theory, BEEPS results suggest that smallfirms in Kosovo and the region countries resulted more financially constrained compared tolarge firms. Moreover, it should be noted that in Kosovo, about 70 percent of firms surveyedby BEEPS were small firms (an average of 43.8 percent of firms were declared as small inthe region countries). This may explain to some extent the rather low rate of bank financingin 2009 in Kosovo as well as in the region.Furthermore, of total firms surveyed, small firms in Kosovo declared of using less bankcredit and borrowings from financial institutions (12.0 per cent) compared to medium orlarge firms (25.6 and 30.1 per cent, respectively). In the region, an average of about 52.9 percent of firms classified as small firms declared of using bank financing in 2009, while theaverage use of bank financing for medium and large firms was higher (67.7 percent and71.9 percent, respectively). Largefirms have easier access to bankfinancing mainly due to the longercredit history because the presence ofinformation facilitates and enablesbetter selection of borrowers. Easieraccess to external financing enableslarge firms to further enhance theiractivity.Figure 75. The percentage of enterprises whichhave used bank financing for investments80706050403020100Small firms face more severefinancing constraints not only becauseof a limited credit supply and thebanks tendency to reject loans toBurimi: www.enterprisesurvey.orgthem, but also because of the firms’limited demand for bank financing. Small firms tend to apply less for bank loans comparedto medium or large firms because transaction costs for the application process can be veryhigh or the value of the collateral they possess is low and does not meet the requiredstandards. This indicates that small firms in most cases do not apply for bank loansbecause they assess that the cost for borrowing is higher than they will be to afford.| 95
- Page 46 and 47: Number 1Financial Stability Reportt
- Page 48 and 49: Number 1Financial Stability Reporta
- Page 50 and 51: Number 1Financial Stability Reportp
- Page 52 and 53: Number 1Financial Stability Reports
- Page 54 and 55: Number 1Financial Stability Reporta
- Page 56 and 57: Number 1Financial Stability Report5
- Page 58 and 59: Number 1Financial Stability Reporti
- Page 60 and 61: Number 1Financial Stability Report5
- Page 62 and 63: Number 1Financial Stability Reporte
- Page 64 and 65: Number 1Financial Stability ReportA
- Page 66 and 67: Number 1Financial Stability ReportG
- Page 68 and 69: Number 1Financial Stability ReportF
- Page 70 and 71: Number 1Financial Stability Report8
- Page 72 and 73: Number 1Financial Stability Report8
- Page 74 and 75: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 76 and 77: Number 1Financial Stability ReportS
- Page 78 and 79: Number 1Financial Stability Reportp
- Page 80 and 81: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 82 and 83: Number 1Financial Stability ReportI
- Page 84 and 85: Number 1Financial Stability Reportc
- Page 86 and 87: Number 1Financial Stability ReportD
- Page 88 and 89: Number 1Financial Stability Report2
- Page 90 and 91: Number 1Financial Stability Reporti
- Page 92 and 93: Number 1Financial Stability ReportA
- Page 94 and 95: Number 1Financial Stability Report1
- Page 98 and 99: Number 1Financial Stability ReportF
- Page 100 and 101: Number 1Financial Stability Report9
- Page 102 and 103: Number 1Financial Stability Report1
- Page 104 and 105: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 106 and 107: Number 1Financial Stability ReportB
- Page 108 and 109: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 110 and 111: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 112 and 113: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 114 and 115: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 116 and 117: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 118 and 119: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 120 and 121: Number 1Financial Stability ReportT
- Page 122 and 123: Number 1Financial Stability ReportF
- Page 124 and 125: CBK Working Paper no. 4Efficiency o
Number 1<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>Findings from BEEPS indicate thatfirms in Kosovo in <strong>20</strong>09 did notperceive access to finance as animpediment to their businessoperation and growth. Adversely, theindicators that point to the level ofaccess to finance in Kosovo resultlower compared with other countriesin the region. Among the firmssurveyed in Kosovo, only 15 percenthave declared to have received loansfrom financial institutions, while theaverage for other countries in theregion for this indicator was 58.8percent (Figure 73). This indicatesFigure 73. The percentage of firms receivingloans from financial institutions807060504030<strong>20</strong>100Burimi: www.enterprisesurvey.orgthat firms in Kosovo rely more on internal funds, while bank financing remains at lowlevels in <strong>20</strong>09 as well.The low level of funding from financial institutions in Kosovo was also reflected in the'<strong>Financial</strong> Access Survey' of the IMF.Figure 74. The number of borrowers fromAccording to this survey, the numbercommercial banks in 1000 adultsof borrowers in commercial banks in900.01000 adult residents in Kosovo was 800.0700.0only about 100 (Figure 74). In region,600.0500.0Serbia and Montenegro had the400.0highest number of borrowers in 1000adult inhabitants (about 171.6 and300.0<strong>20</strong>0.0100.0217.8 borrowers per 10000.0inhabitants). Most of the countries inthe region had no available data forthis indicator. With about 132.2<strong>20</strong>08 <strong>20</strong>09borrowers per 1000 adult residents,Kosovo has the lowest number ofSource: <strong>Financial</strong> access survey, IMFborrowers from commercial banks, leaving behind only Albania with 99.6.That firms in Kosovo face higher financing constrained relative to countries in the region isalso reflected through the low rate of private sector lending as a share to GDP indicator. In<strong>20</strong>09, private sector lending rate as a share to GDP in Kosovo was around 32.9 percent,while the regional average for this indicator in the same period was around 52.7 percent.Montenegro reported the highest private sector lending rate (77.7 percent of GDP) followedby Croatia (66.5 percent of GDP). Apart from Kosovo, Albania reported the lowest rate ofprivate sector lending (36.6 per cent of GDP).The literature on access to finance suggests that regardless of size or ownership, firms tendto turn to external funds only after the internal funds have been used completely. This isdue to a number of reasons, including monitoring and transaction costs for obtaining bankloans such as the applications costs, screening costs, bankruptcy costs, etc. (Hashi and Toçi,<strong>20</strong>10). However, using internal funds rather than bank financing has been considered toadversely affect business growth and development, regardless of firm size (Chavis et al.<strong>20</strong>10). This, to some extent, may be because when a firm is funded by a bank, the bank's94 |