Number 1<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>As mentioned before, the present research extends the EBRD survey to capture otherstages and elements prior to legal enforcement such as voluntary compliance, bargaining,self-help and the market for collateral. The survey results reveal that around 60 percent ofdefaulted loans never reach the court stage and are resolved by voluntary compliance, afterthe 'threat' is made. In these cases the recovery is around 50 percent of the amount. Fromthe threats used by banks, respondents considered 'the bank will confiscate the collateral'as the most effective, followed by 'the bank will involve the court'. In the third place werereputation considerations such as 'the bank will not extend credit in the future', 'the bankwill force the guarantor to pay the debt', etc. This may give an impression of the credibilityof institutions in the country or at least in the lender-borrower relationship. Theenforcement of creditor rights is largely dependent also on the extent to which creditorspursue their claims actively by demanding legal services. Better law enforcement occurswhen the legal staff work extensively on contractual matters and when enterprisepersonnel possess larger amounts of legal human capital (Hendley, et al. <strong>20</strong>01). For the caseof Kosova, KCBS (<strong>20</strong>05) points out that one bank aggressively enforces its legalrepossession and the right to sell the collateral with the help of its own legal staff who workclosely with judges, sometimes 'showing them how', and is quite successful.When 'threats' fail, the bargaining phase follows, though it is rarely practiced (less than <strong>20</strong>percent of cases). If bargaining takes place between the lenders and the defaultingborrower, they are not likely to give significant concessions. For example, they may extendthe period of repayment but not other terms. Again, recovery in these cases is high (around70 percent of the amount). This may show the better bargaining position of the banks and,again, the credibility of institutions. After the bargaining phase, there are two possibilities:self-help or court involvement. In terms of self-help, i.e. banks confiscating the collateral bycourt order but without the involvement of court officials and/or police, the results suggestthat on average 3 percent of cases are solved in this way, around <strong>20</strong> percent of the amountis recovered and within two months. When it comes to the existence of a market forcollateral, the picture is somewhat different. Banks’ responses suggest that, on average,banks achieve to sell only around 30 percent of the pledged assets and the recovery isaround 50 percent of the amount of loan and within a period of 3.5 months.10.6. ConclusionsKosovo started to build its institutions only after the war in 1999. Since then Kosovo hasmarked substantial progress in establishing and functionalizing the institutions needed forthe operation of a market economy, including the provision of conditions that ensure thefunctioning of the financial market and the protection of creditor rights. Based on the lawin books, Kosovo has made significant progress with regard to the protection of creditorrights – outperforming other transition economies and some developed countries. However,the picture is not very clear when considering the enforcement of creditor rights. Based onthe Contract Enforcement Days indicator, Kosovo stands better than other transitioneconomies and even some OECD countries. On the other hand, World Bank’s Rule of LawIndex presents less favourable picture for Kosovo, suggesting that it lags behind othercountries concerning law enforcement. However, these indicators have their drawbacksand, as such, may not fully capture the enforcement of creditor rights specifically withregard to the lender-borrower relationship.90 |
<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>Number 1Based on the EBRD methodology (NLIS <strong>20</strong>03), a survey with four banks operating inKosovo was conducted aiming at providing an up-to-date assessment on the enforcement ofcreditor rights in the lender-borrower relationship in Kosovo. The survey results suggestthat, compared to year <strong>20</strong>05, the overall picture for the enforcement of creditor rights inKosovo is broadly the same. Among the most important factors affecting the enforcementprocess, according to banks’ responses, are the inefficiency of courts, corruption and debtorobstruction. Regarding the inefficiency of courts, the main complaints of respondents werethat courts lack the expertise and resources to do their job. Therefore, the enforcementprocess would be facilitated if specific commercial courts or specialized judges were to dealwith commercial disputes. The inefficiency of courts is reported to cause delays in theprocess of contract enforcement and, to some extent, may have induced the culture of nonpaymentby borrowers, which can be expressed through the increasing debtor obstruction inthe enforcement process. However, the results indicate that Kosovo compares well withcountries in the region and other transition economies with respect to the enforcement ofcreditor rights. The survey was also extended to cover other stages prior to legalenforcement such as voluntary compliance, bargaining, self-help and the market forcollateral. Results show that a substantial part of default cases never reach the court fordispute resolution but is solved by voluntary compliance, thus emphasizing the role of thecredibility of institutions in the enforcement process.| 91