13.07.2015 Views

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

Vol 7 No 1 - Roger Williams University School of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cases where the manner <strong>of</strong> collection allows fairly preciseidentification, even without a name, such collection will not beallowed.An interesting question that arose in the DoubleClick caseand that is allied to the notion <strong>of</strong> database rights is whether thedata subject has a right to claim payment for the data that hasbeen collected and is being exploited. There, the court explained:Plaintiffs also contend that they have suffered economicdamages consisting <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong>: (1) the opportunity topresent plaintiffs with advertising; and (2) thedemographic information DoubleClick has collected.Essentially, they argue that because companies payDoubleClick for plaintiffs’ attention (to advertisements)and demographic information, the value <strong>of</strong> these servicesmust, in some part, have rightfully belonged to plaintiffs.They point to AOL in which the court appeared to holdthat damage to “reputation and goodwill” countedtowards the damage threshold and argue that, by thesame logic, the economic value <strong>of</strong> their attention anddemographic information should count as well.Even assuming that the economic value <strong>of</strong> plaintiffs’attention and demographic information could be countedtowards the monetary threshold—a dubiousassumption—it would still be insufficient. We do notcommonly believe that the economic value <strong>of</strong> ourattention is unjustly taken from us when we choose towatch a television show or read a newspaper withadvertisements and we are unaware <strong>of</strong> any statute orcaselaw that holds it is. We see no reason why Web siteadvertising should be treated any differently. A personwho chooses to visit a Web page and is confronted by atargeted advertisement is no more deprived <strong>of</strong> hisattention’s economic value than are his <strong>of</strong>f-line peers.Similarly, although demographic information is valuedhighly (as DoubleClick undoubtedly believed when it paidover one billion dollars for Abacus), the value <strong>of</strong> itscollection has never been considered a economic loss t<strong>of</strong>actors specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or socialidentity”).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!